Paper · 2011 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

A Greenhouse Study On Growth, Yield And Anatomical Parameters Of Three Pea Cultivars: Under Different Irrigation Levels And Growth Regulators

Dohuky, M. M.; Abdel, C. G.; Khalid, N. S.

18
claims
33
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This experiment was carried out during the fall season 2009-2010 in the vegetable greenhouse, Horticulture Department, Dohuk University. Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected to three irrigation levels where plant irrigated whenever 25, 50 or 75% of pot available water capacity were depleted, besides plants were sprayed with either 100mgl-1 gibberellic acid (GA3), 100mgl-1 indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 2.5gl-1 micronutrient and distilled water as a check treatment. The objective was to evaluate the cultivar performance under adequate and inadequate irrigation during flowering, pod swelling and seed filling stages to find out which is the best, particularly under moderate and severe drought, besides that we intended to evaluate the possibility extent of boosting drought resistance of these cultivars by the aid of GA3, IBA and micronutrients. The obtained results exhibited that irrigating pea plants whenever 25% 0f pot available water capacity was depleted appeared to be the paramount irrigation treatment followed by that of 50% depletion and irrigation level of 75% are not advisable. 25% irrigation level manifested the highest leaf number per plant (26.33), plant height (141.15 cm), root dry weight (0.16g), flower number per plant (6.48), individual pod fresh weight (3.56g), seed number per pod (3.47), green pod yield per plant (14.53g), weight 100 seeds (23.02g), seed fresh weight per pod (1.44g), pericarp fresh weight (2.05g), aperture length of upper leaf stomata (4.38μm), stomata length of leaf lower surface (6.23 μm), stomata aperture length of leaf lower surface (4.75 μm), smallest vessel width (3.72 μm), protein content of dry seed (25.3%), GA3 (346.63 mgkg-1 dry seeds), and IAA (4109.72 mgkg-1 dry seeds). The best plant response was confined to these sprayed with micronutrient, then IBA and the lowest was GA3-treated pea. Pea sprayed by 2gl-1 micronutrients manifested the highest root dry weight (0.16g), leaf dry matter percentage (26.36%), stem dry matter percentage (35.77%), flower number per plant (6.43), pod number per plant (4.49), individual pod fresh weight (3.01g), seed number per pod (3.64), yield of fresh pods per plant (13.33g), total pod number per plant (4.11), weight of 100 seeds (23.51), fresh weight of pericarp (1.6g), stomata length at upper leaf surface (6.05μm), stomata length at lower leaf surface (6.6 μm), stomata width at lower leaf surface (3.78 μm), stomata aperture length at lower leaf surface (4.61 μm), stomata aperture width at lower leaf surface (2.38 μm), stomata population at lower and upper leaf surface (5971.88 and 3792.19 stomata mm-2, respectively), chlorophyll percentage out of gross pigments (40.05%), proline content (0.0062 μgg-1 dry seeds), ABA (713.31 mgkg-1 dry seeds) and IAA (3725.23 mgkg-1 dry seeds). Crinkle pea appeared to be the potent cultivar it gave the highest yield of green pod (14.6 gplant-1), plant height (119.8cm), leaf dry weight (0.27g), root dry weight (0.25g), leaf dry mater percentage (28.79%), stem dry matter percentage (36.39%), flower number (6.75), pod number per plant (4.62), individual pod dry weight (1.21g), pod fresh weight (2.72g), seed number per pod (2.95), pericap fresh weight (1.51g), dry pericarp (0.57g), upper leaf surface stomata width (3.7μm), upper leaf surface stomata length (6 μm), stomata aperture length of upper leaf surface (4.32 μm), stomata aperture width of upper leaf surface (2.2 μm), aperture length of lower leaf surface stomata (4.64 μm), aperture width of lower leaf surface stomata (2.32 μm), stomata length at lower leaf surface (6.4 μm), stomata width at lower leaf surface (3.96 μm), the widest and lowest vessels width (10.37 and 3.8μm, respectively), vessels number per bundle (12.46) and chlorophyll percentage related to gross pigments (34.74%). Local smooth comes next then the worst cultivar was Canadian. Therefore, crinkle was most drought resistant pea cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25% irrigation level gave the highest leaf number per plant, 26.33.

Treatment
25% irrigation levele1
Outcome
leaf number per plante1
Direction
higheste1
Value
26.33e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% irrigation level manifested the highest leaf number per plant (26.33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25% irrigation level gave the highest plant height, 141.15 cm.

Treatment
25% irrigation levele1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
141.15 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% irrigation level manifested the highest leaf number per plant (26.33), plant height (141.15 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25% irrigation level gave the highest green pod yield per plant, 14.53 g.

Treatment
25% irrigation levele1
Outcome
green pod yield per plante1
Direction
higheste1
Value
14.53ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% irrigation level manifested the highest leaf number per plant (26.33), plant height (141.15 cm), root dry weight (0.16g), flower number per plant (6.48), individual pod fresh weight (3.56g), seed number per pod (3.47), green pod yield per plant (14.53g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25% irrigation level gave the highest weight of 100 seeds, 23.02 g.

Treatment
25% irrigation levele1
Outcome
weight 100 seedse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
23.02ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% irrigation level manifested the highest leaf number per plant (26.33), plant height (141.15 cm), root dry weight (0.16g), flower number per plant (6.48), individual pod fresh weight (3.56g), seed number per pod (3.47), green pod yield per plant (14.53g), weight 100 seeds (23.02g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25% irrigation level gave the highest protein content of dry seed, 25.3%.

Treatment
25% irrigation levele1
Outcome
protein content of dry seede1
Direction
higheste1
Value
25.3%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% irrigation level manifested the highest leaf number per plant (26.33), plant height (141.15 cm), root dry weight (0.16g), flower number per plant (6.48), individual pod fresh weight (3.56g), seed number per pod (3.47), green pod yield per plant (14.53g), weight 100 seeds (23.02g), seed fresh weight per pod (1.44g), pericarp fresh weight (2.05g), aperture length of upper leaf stomata (4.38μm), stomata length of leaf lower surface (6.23 μm), stomata aperture length of leaf lower surface (4.75 μm), smallest vessel width (3.72 μm), protein content of dry seed (25.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25% irrigation level gave the highest GA3 content in dry seeds, 346.63 mg/kg.

Treatment
25% irrigation levele1
Outcome
GA3e1
Direction
higheste1
Value
346.63 mgkg-1 dry seedse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% irrigation level manifested the highest leaf number per plant (26.33), plant height (141.15 cm), root dry weight (0.16g), flower number per plant (6.48), individual pod fresh weight (3.56g), seed number per pod (3.47), green pod yield per plant (14.53g), weight 100 seeds (23.02g), seed fresh weight per pod (1.44g), pericarp fresh weight (2.05g), aperture length of upper leaf stomata (4.38μm), stomata length of leaf lower surface (6.23 μm), stomata aperture length of leaf lower surface (4.75 μm), smallest vessel width (3.72 μm), protein content of dry seed (25.3%), GA3 (346.63 mgkg-1 dry seeds)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25% irrigation level gave the highest IAA content in dry seeds, 4109.72 mg/kg.

Treatment
25% irrigation levele1
Outcome
IAAe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4109.72 mgkg-1 dry seedse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% irrigation level manifested the highest leaf number per plant (26.33), plant height (141.15 cm), root dry weight (0.16g), flower number per plant (6.48), individual pod fresh weight (3.56g), seed number per pod (3.47), green pod yield per plant (14.53g), weight 100 seeds (23.02g), seed fresh weight per pod (1.44g), pericarp fresh weight (2.05g), aperture length of upper leaf stomata (4.38μm), stomata length of leaf lower surface (6.23 μm), stomata aperture length of leaf lower surface (4.75 μm), smallest vessel width (3.72 μm), protein content of dry seed (25.3%), GA3 (346.63 mgkg-1 dry seeds), and IAA (4109.72 mgkg-1 dry seeds)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray gave the highest root dry weight, 0.16 g.

Treatment
2gl-1 micronutrientse1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.16ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea sprayed by 2gl-1 micronutrients manifested the highest root dry weight (0.16g), leaf dry matter percentage (26.36%), stem dry matter percentage (35.77%), flower number per plant (6.43), pod number per plant (4.49)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray gave the highest leaf dry matter percentage, 26.36%.

Treatment
2gl-1 micronutrientse1
Outcome
leaf dry matter percentagee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
26.36%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea sprayed by 2gl-1 micronutrients manifested the highest root dry weight (0.16g), leaf dry matter percentage (26.36%), stem dry matter percentage (35.77%), flower number per plant (6.43), pod number per plant (4.49)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray gave the highest stem dry matter percentage, 35.77%.

Treatment
2gl-1 micronutrientse1
Outcome
stem dry matter percentagee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
35.77%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea sprayed by 2gl-1 micronutrients manifested the highest root dry weight (0.16g), leaf dry matter percentage (26.36%), stem dry matter percentage (35.77%), flower number per plant (6.43), pod number per plant (4.49)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray gave the highest pod number per plant, 4.49.

Treatment
2gl-1 micronutrientse1
Outcome
pod number per plante1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.49e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea sprayed by 2gl-1 micronutrients manifested the highest root dry weight (0.16g), leaf dry matter percentage (26.36%), stem dry matter percentage (35.77%), flower number per plant (6.43), pod number per plant (4.49)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray gave the highest chlorophyll percentage out of gross pigments, 40.05%.

Treatment
2gl-1 micronutrientse1
Outcome
chlorophyll percentage out of gross pigmentse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
40.05%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea sprayed by 2gl-1 micronutrients manifested the highest root dry weight (0.16g), leaf dry matter percentage (26.36%), stem dry matter percentage (35.77%), flower number per plant (6.43), pod number per plant (4.49), individual pod fresh weight (3.01g), seed number per pod (3.64), yield of fresh pods per plant (13.33g), total pod number per plant (4.11), weight of 100 seeds (23.51), fresh weight of pericarp (1.6g), stomata length at upper leaf surface (6.05μm), stomata length at lower leaf surface (6.6 μm), stomata width at lower leaf surface (3.78 μm), stomata aperture length at lower leaf surface (4.61 μm), stomata aperture width at lower leaf surface (2.38 μm), stomata population at lower and upper leaf surface (5971.88 and 3792.19 stomata mm-2, respectively), chlorophyll percentage out of gross pigments (40.05%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2734 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crinkle pea gave the highest green pod yield, 14.6 g per plant.

Material
Local crinklee0
Outcome
yield of green pode1
Direction
higheste1
Value
14.6 gplant-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crinkle pea appeared to be the potent cultivar it gave the highest yield of green pod (14.6 gplant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2844–2945 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crinkle was the most drought resistant pea cultivar.

Material
crinklee1
Outcome
drought resistante1
Direction
moste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Therefore, crinkle was most drought resistant pea cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3917–3975 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A 75% irrigation level is not advisable for pea.

Outcome
irrigation level of 75%e1
Qualifier
not advisablee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation level of 75% are not advisable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canadian was the worst pea cultivar.

Material
Canadiane0
Outcome
worst cultivare1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Local smooth comes next then the worst cultivar was Canadian”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3855–3915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 treatment gave the lowest plant response in pea, below micronutrient spray.

Treatment
GA3e1
Outcome
plant responsee1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
micronutriente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The best plant response was confined to these sprayed with micronutrient, then IBA and the lowest was GA3-treated pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigating whenever 25% of available water was depleted gave the paramount irrigation treatment, ahead of 50% depletion.

Treatment
irrigating pea plants whenever 25% 0f pot available water capacity was depletede1
Outcome
paramount irrigation treatmente1
Direction
paramounte1
Comparator
that of 50% depletione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“irrigating pea plants whenever 25% 0f pot available water capacity was depleted appeared to be the paramount irrigation treatment followed by that of 50% depletion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1096 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

micronutrient · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

irrigation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

micronutrient · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.