Paper · 1983 · Agronomy Journal

Response of Several Genetic Sources of Corn to Acidic Soil1

Kishor Sherchan; Roscoe Ellis; David A. Whitney; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Plants differ in their ability to take up nutrients. Developing genotypes efficient in utilizing nutrients from acid or low nutrient soils would aid in growing crops successfully when mineral supplementation is not feasible. This study was conducted in the greenhouse using mine spoil soil of initial pH 3.9 with variables of genetic sources of corn ( Zea mays L.) and lime rates. Genetic source variability was more pronounced under stress conditions (low pH) than under nonstress conditions. The genetic sources PI270083, PI270080, and Va17 showed higher tolerance to acidic conditions than others. Inbred C105, highly susceptible to low pH, showed the most visual root damage as well as the lowest relative dry matter yield. Aluminum concentration in the plant tissue did not vary significantly with lime level; however, exchangeable Al in the soil decreased drastically as the level of lime application increased. Manganese in the plant tissue and in the soil (DTPA extractable) both decreased with increased lime rate. Dry matter yield decreased significantly at 16 500 kg ha −1 of lime compared with 8000 kg ha −1 . Phosphorus concentration decreased in the plant as well as in the soil (Bray P‐1 extractable) at 16 500 kg ha −1 lime, which could have been a factor in reduced yield. Genetic source by lime interaction was significant for Ca, Mg, Al, and Mn concentration indicating that selection under different pH levels would be productive.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn genetic source variability was more pronounced under low pH stress.

Outcome
Genetic source variabilitye0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
stress conditions (low pH)e0
Comparator
nonstress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic source variability was more pronounced under stress conditions (low pH) than under nonstress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI270083, PI270080, and Va17 showed higher acid tolerance than other genetic sources.

Material
PI270083, PI270080, and Va17e0
Outcome
tolerance to acidic conditionse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genetic sources PI270083, PI270080, and Va17 showed higher tolerance to acidic conditions than others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C105 showed the most visual root damage under low pH.

Material
C105e0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
visual root damagee0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inbred C105, highly susceptible to low pH, showed the most visual root damage as well as the lowest relative dry matter yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C105 had the lowest relative dry matter yield.

Material
C105e0
Outcome
relative dry matter yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inbred C105, highly susceptible to low pH, showed the most visual root damage as well as the lowest relative dry matter yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant tissue aluminum concentration did not vary significantly with lime level.

Treatment
lime levele0
Outcome
Aluminum concentration in the plant tissuee0
Direction
did not varye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum concentration in the plant tissue did not vary significantly with lime level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable soil aluminum decreased drastically with increased lime application.

Treatment
lime applicatione0
Outcome
exchangeable Al in the soile0
Direction
decreased drasticallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exchangeable Al in the soil decreased drastically as the level of lime application increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese in plant tissue decreased with increased lime rate.

Treatment
increased lime ratee0
Outcome
Manganese in the plant tissuee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manganese in the plant tissue and in the soil (DTPA extractable) both decreased with increased lime rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil extractable manganese decreased with increased lime rate.

Treatment
increased lime ratee0
Outcome
in the soil (DTPA extractable)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manganese in the plant tissue and in the soil (DTPA extractable) both decreased with increased lime rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield decreased significantly at 16 500 kg ha −1 lime versus 8000 kg ha −1.

Treatment
16 500 kg ha −1 of limee0
Outcome
Dry matter yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
8000 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter yield decreased significantly at 16 500 kg ha −1 of lime compared with 8000 kg ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant phosphorus concentration decreased at 16 500 kg ha −1 lime.

Treatment
16 500 kg ha −1 limee0
Outcome
Phosphorus concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
in the plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus concentration decreased in the plant as well as in the soil (Bray P‐1 extractable) at 16 500 kg ha −1 lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil extractable phosphorus decreased at 16 500 kg ha −1 lime.

Treatment
16 500 kg ha −1 limee0
Outcome
in the soil (Bray P‐1 extractable)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus concentration decreased in the plant as well as in the soil (Bray P‐1 extractable) at 16 500 kg ha −1 lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic source by lime interaction was significant for calcium, magnesium, aluminum and manganese concentrations.

Material
Genetic sourcee0
Treatment
limee0
Outcome
Ca, Mg, Al, and Mn concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic source by lime interaction was significant for Ca, Mg, Al, and Mn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer selection under different pH levels would be productive.

Outcome
selection under different pH levels would be productivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicating that selection under different pH levels would be productive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑

lime · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 71 positive, 24 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 185 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.