Paper · 1990 · Physiologia Plantarum

Maximal biomass production can occur in corn (Zea mays) in the absence of NO3 accumulation in either leaves or roots

Saadi Khamis; Thierry Lamaze

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to investigate effects of limited NO 3 availability in corn ( Zea mays L. cv. Brulouis) 17‐day‐old plants were grown for a further 25 days on sand in a growth chamber. The plants received frequent irrigation with a complete nutrient solution containing 0.2, 0.6, 1.5 or 3.0 mM NO 3 . With 0.2 mM NO; nitrate levels in both roots and leaves diminished rapidly and were almost zero after 10 days treatment. Concurrently, as signs of nitrogen deficiency appeared, shoot growth was restricted, whereas root growth was enhanced. In addition, the concentration of reduced nitrogen and malate in the leaves declined, and in vitro nitrate reductase activity (NRA. EC 1.6.6.1), soluble protein and chlorophyll levels of leaf tissue were depressed and starch concentration was enhanced. With 0.6 mM NO 3 in the nutrient solution, the decrease in NO 3 levels in the tissues and the increase in root development were similar to those observed with 0.2 mM NO 3 . However, shoot growth, reduced nitrogen concentration in leaves, and the above‐mentioned biochemical characteristics were almost identical to those obtained at 1.5 and 3.0 mM NO 3 . This indicates that when supplied with 0.6 mM NO 3 , corn plants were able to absorb sufficient NO3 to support maximal biomass production without appreciable NO 3 accumulation in roots or shoot. It is, thus, suggested that the plants responded to low NO 3 , availability in medium by enhancing root growth and by maximizing NO 3 reduction relative to NO 3 accumulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.2 mM nitrate, root and leaf nitrate nearly vanished after ten days.

Treatment
0.2 mM NOe0
Outcome
nitrate levels in both roots and leavese0
Direction
diminishede0
Value
almost zeroe0
Comparator
1.5e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 0.2 mM NO; nitrate levels in both roots and leaves diminished rapidly and were almost zero after 10 days treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“at 1.5 and 3.0 mM NO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrate restricted shoot growth.

Treatment
0.2 mM NOe1
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
restrictede0
Comparator
1.5e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot growth was restricted, whereas root growth was enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“With 0.2 mM NO; nitrate levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–323 · show in text ↑
e2

“at 1.5 and 3.0 mM NO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrate enhanced root growth.

Treatment
0.2 mM NOe1
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
1.5e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot growth was restricted, whereas root growth was enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“With 0.2 mM NO; nitrate levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–323 · show in text ↑
e2

“at 1.5 and 3.0 mM NO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf reduced nitrogen and malate concentrations declined under low nitrate.

Outcome
concentration of reduced nitrogen and malate in the leavese0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of reduced nitrogen and malate in the leaves declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrate reductase activity, protein and chlorophyll decreased under low nitrate.

Outcome
nitrate reductase activity (NRA. EC 1.6.6.1), soluble protein and chlorophyll levelse0
Direction
depressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in vitro nitrate reductase activity (NRA. EC 1.6.6.1), soluble protein and chlorophyll levels of leaf tissue were depressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf starch concentration rose under low nitrate.

Outcome
starch concentratione0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“starch concentration was enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.6 mM nitrate, tissue nitrate declined similarly to 0.2 mM.

Treatment
0.6 mM NO 3e0
Outcome
NO 3 levels in the tissuese0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
0.2 mM NO 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 0.6 mM NO 3 in the nutrient solution, the decrease in NO 3 levels in the tissues and the increase in root development were similar to those observed with 0.2 mM NO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.6 mM nitrate, root development increased similarly to 0.2 mM.

Treatment
0.6 mM NO 3e0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
0.2 mM NO 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 0.6 mM NO 3 in the nutrient solution, the decrease in NO 3 levels in the tissues and the increase in root development were similar to those observed with 0.2 mM NO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.6 mM nitrate, shoot growth and leaf biochemical traits matched higher nitrate treatments.

Outcome
shoot growth, reduced nitrogen concentration in leaves, and the above‐mentioned biochemical characteristicse0
Comparator
1.5 and 3.0 mM NO 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot growth, reduced nitrogen concentration in leaves, and the above‐mentioned biochemical characteristics were almost identical to those obtained at 1.5 and 3.0 mM NO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn achieved maximal biomass at 0.6 mM nitrate without appreciable nitrate accumulation.

Treatment
0.6 mM NO 3e0
Outcome
maximal biomass production without appreciable NO 3 accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when supplied with 0.6 mM NO 3 , corn plants were able to absorb sufficient NO3 to support maximal biomass production without appreciable NO 3 accumulation in roots or shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1334 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggested enhanced root growth and nitrate reduction as responses to low nitrate.

Outcome
maximizing NO 3 reduction relative to NO 3 accumulatione0
Qualifier
enhancing root growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants responded to low NO 3 , availability in medium by enhancing root growth and by maximizing NO 3 reduction relative to NO 3 accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑

nitric oxide · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitric oxide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.