Paper · 2012 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect of Different Fertilization Methods and Nitrogen Doses on the Weediness of Winter Wheat

É. Lehoczky; A. Kismányoky; T. Lencse; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The field study was conducted in April 2006 in a long-term fertilization experiment that was set up in 1983. The aims of this study are to compare the weediness in plots with nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium (NPK), NPK + farmyard manure (FYM), and NPK + stalk treatments and to study the effect of increasing N doses on the weeds and winter wheat plants. The bifactorial test was arranged in a split-plot design with three replications. The treatments were the following: 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg ha−1 N, 100 kg ha−1 phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5), and 100 kg ha−1 potassium oxide (K2O). Three weed species were dominant in the experiment: Veronica hederifolia, Consolida regalis, and Stellaria media. The NPK treatment resulted in the smallest average weed cover. The significantly greatest weed cover was found on the plots treated with NPK + FYM, but the greatest biomass production of winter wheat was measured also in the NPK + FYM treatment, which resulted in a good crop competition. The weed cover was increased proportionally by the rising N doses. The effect of increasing N rates was positive on the winter wheat biomass and on wheat competition to the weeds. Results of our study show that we can manage weeds better using favorable plant nutrition. Keywords: Biomass productionfertilizationN dosesweedswinter wheat Acknowledgment The authors express their sincere thanks for the financial support by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) K60314.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three weeds dominated the experimental plots.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Veronica hederifoliaVeronica hederifoliae0weed
Second interactor
Consolida regalisConsolida regalise0weed
Outcome
Three weed species were dominante0
Qualifier
Stellaria mediae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Veronica hederifolia
Veronica hederifolia · InteractorKaldari · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Consolida regalis
Consolida regalis · Second interactorPicture taken by BerndH · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Three weed species were dominant in the experiment: Veronica hederifolia, Consolida regalis, and Stellaria media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK had the smallest average weed cover.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
weed covere0
Direction
smalleste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The NPK treatment resulted in the smallest average weed cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus manure had the greatest weed cover.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NPK + FYMe0
Outcome
weed covere0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The significantly greatest weed cover was found on the plots treated with NPK + FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus manure gave the greatest wheat biomass.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
NPK + FYMe0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“the greatest biomass production of winter wheat was measured also in the NPK + FYM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen dose raised weed cover proportionally.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
rising N dosese0
Outcome
weed covere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The weed cover was increased proportionally by the rising N doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen increased wheat biomass.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
increasing N ratese0
Outcome
winter wheat biomasse0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect of increasing N rates was positive on the winter wheat biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen improved wheat competition against weeds.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing N ratese0
Outcome
wheat competition to the weedse0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect of increasing N rates was positive on the winter wheat biomass and on wheat competition to the weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1175 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend favorable plant nutrition to manage weeds.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
manage weeds better using favorable plant nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“we can manage weeds better using favorable plant nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1266 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

nitrogen · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.