Paper · 1987 · EPPO Bulletin

Concepts and methods in biological control of diseases in apple orchards1

E. BOSSHARD; H. SCHÜEPP; W. SIEGFRIED

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The project ‘Promotion of Biological Methods in Apple Growing’ which started in Switzerland in 1985 concentrates on the control of Venturia inaequalis (scab) and Podosphaera leucotricha (powdery mildew). The project considers the selection of suitable cultivars resistant or only slightly susceptible to fungal diseases and the assessment of tolerable economic loss. It also includes curative treatments with sterol‐synthesis‐inhibiting fungicides, according to scab infection periods, as well as applications of plant extracts (proposed by the Institute of Biological Husbandry) and suspensions of antagonists or their culture filtrates as plant‐protecting agents. Screening experiments on apple seedlings showed that root extracts of Rumex obtusifolium significantly reduced powdery mildew infections under greenhouse conditions. In field experiments treatments with R. obtusifolium extracts at intervals of 7–10 days were less effective. Saponin‐containing extracts of different plants gave satisfying control of scab on seedlings in the growth chamber but were not very effective in the field. Applications of spore suspensions and culture filtrates of the phyllosphere fungi Chaetomium spp. reduced scab and mildew infections on apple seedlings to some extent. It was found that in the last 2 years even primary infections of P. leucotricha were severely parasitized by Ampelomyces quisqualis . Preliminary studies showed that the lack of efficacy of this biocontrol system is due to the delayed spread of the hyperparasite.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rumex obtusifolium root extracts significantly reduced powdery mildew infection on apple seedlings in greenhouse screening.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
root extracts of Rumex obtusifoliume0
Interactor
Rumex obtusifoliume0other
Outcome
powdery mildew infectionse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Screening experiments on apple seedlings showed that root extracts of Rumex obtusifolium significantly reduced powdery mildew infections under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rumex obtusifolium extract treatments every 7–10 days were less effective in field apple trials.

Treatment
R. obtusifolium extracts at intervals of 7–10 dayse0
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“In field experiments treatments with R. obtusifolium extracts at intervals of 7–10 days were less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saponin-containing plant extracts gave satisfactory scab control on apple seedlings in a growth chamber.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
Saponin‐containing extracts of different plantse0
Outcome
control of scabe0
Direction
satisfyinge0
Setting
growth chambere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Saponin‐containing extracts of different plants gave satisfying control of scab on seedlings in the growth chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saponin-containing plant extracts were not very effective against apple scab in the field.

Treatment
Saponin‐containing extracts of different plantse0
Outcome
control of scabe0
Direction
not very effectivee0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Saponin‐containing extracts of different plants gave satisfying control of scab on seedlings in the growth chamber but were not very effective in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chaetomium spore suspensions and culture filtrates reduced scab infection on apple seedlings to some extent.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
spore suspensions and culture filtrates of the phyllosphere fungi Chaetomium spp.e0
Interactor
Chaetomium spp.Chaetomiume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
scab and mildew infectionse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chaetomium
Chaetomium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNo machine-readable author provided. Keisotyo assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applications of spore suspensions and culture filtrates of the phyllosphere fungi Chaetomium spp. reduced scab and mildew infections on apple seedlings to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1264 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ampelomyces quisqualis severely parasitized primary Podosphaera leucotricha infections in the last two years.

Taxon
P. leucotrichaPodosphaera leucotrichae0
Interactor
Ampelomyces quisqualisAmpelomyces quisqualise0parasite
Outcome
primary infections of P. leucotricha were severely parasitizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Podosphaera leucotricha
Podosphaera leucotricha · TaxonJonathan Billinger · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ampelomyces quisqualis
Ampelomyces quisqualis · InteractorBjörn S... · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“in the last 2 years even primary infections of P. leucotricha were severely parasitized by Ampelomyces quisqualis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1397 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute poor efficacy of the hyperparasite control system to its delayed spread.

Outcome
lack of efficacy of this biocontrol systeme0
Qualifier
delayed spread of the hyperparasitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lack of efficacy of this biocontrol system is due to the delayed spread of the hyperparasite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1528 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.