Paper · 1997 · jpa

Sunflower Response to Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Wheat‐Fallow Cropping Systems

S. Geleta; D. D. Baltensperger; G. D. Binford; et al.

16
claims
30
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) is often grown as an alternative crop in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)‐fallow areas of the northern High Plains. Optimum management of fertilizers is important to maximize profit potential and avoid environmental concerns. The objectives of this research were to determine the environmental and soil conditions where seed yield, oil content, and chlorophyll responses to added N and P fertilizers should be expected for sunflower grown in the northern High Plains. Sunflower was grown over 40 site‐years in the Nebraska Panhandle during 1993 and 1994 on producers’ fields. Fertilizer treatments were four rates of N (0,35,70, and 105 lb N/acre) with or without 69 lb P 2 O 5 /acre. All fertilizers were broadcast and incorporated shortly after planting. Sunflower was grown in a wheat‐sunflower‐fallow cropping system. Fertilizer effect was evaluated for three sunflower seed yield goals: high (>1000 lb/acre), medium (500–1000 lb/acre), and low (<500 lb/acre). Application of P did not influence sunflower seed yield and oil content. Regardless of the initial soil nitrate level or yield goals, application of N beyond 35 lb/acre did not influence seed yield in 80% of the site‐years. However, the percentage seed oil content was reduced significantly by increasing levels of N for most site‐years. The relationship between the N levels and oil content had an 13 value of 0.96 for the high, 0.93 for the medium, and 0.94 for the low yield goals. Residual nitrate level did not significantly influence either the seed yield or the seed oil content. Chlorophyll meter readings increased with application of N fertilizers at six site‐years; however, at these sites N did not Significantly affect seed yield. The results indicate that fertilizer N and P application in the region is not producing economic returns. The yields were highly variable and not significantly affected by the growing season, total precipitation, or soil moisture content at time of planting. The lack of response to N or P fertilizers regardless of the soil N and P level, indicate that other growth factors such as precipitation and temperature at critical growth stages and types of sunflower cultivars are the possible sunflower yield‐controlling factors for the region. Research Question In the northern High Plains, sunflower is often used as an alternative crop in wheat‐fallow rotations to diversify cropping systems and to increase profit by growing more than one crop in 2 yr. Optimum management of fertilizer is important for maximum profit potential and for avoiding environmental concerns such as nitrate leaching and N and P runoff from surface application. The objective of this study was to determine the N and P requirement of sunflower grown in a wheat‐sunflower‐fallow cropping system. Literature Summary Soil N status is critical for optimal production of oilseed crops. Lack of N results in low yields, while excess N promotes reduced oil contents. However, the effect may vary depending on soils and environmental conditions. In the High Plains, lack of moisture is often the factor that limits yield in many years and responses to fertilizer are not usually observed in this situation. Current recommendations for N in the region are based primarily on data developed in other sunflower producing regions. No database is available concerning N fertilization of sunflower in the northern High Plains when used as an alternative crop in a wheat‐fallow rotation. Study Description Forty site‐year field experiments were conducted in four western Nebraska counties by the University of Nebraska Panhandle Research and Extension Center, located at Scottsbluff, during 1993 and 1994. Soils: Alliance, Keith, Kuma, Rosebud, Satanta, Tripp loam, Duroc and Keith silt loam, and Bayard fine sandy loam are the major soils on which the experiments were conducted. Experimental Design: Factorial in a randomized complete block with three replications at each site‐year. Treatments: Four N rates (0, 35, 70, and 105 lb N/acre) applied as ammonium nitrate in a factorial combination with two rates of P fertilization (0 and 69 lb P 2 O 5 /acre) applied as triple super phosphate Applied Questions What effect did applied N have on sunflower yield? Nitrogen fertilization did not routinely increase seed yields of sunflower used as an alternative crop in wheat‐fallow rotations in the northern High Plains. Regardless of the residual nitrate N status of the soils, yields were not affected by N additions in most site‐years. A wide range of seed yield was obtained on soils with comparable residual nitrate N, indicating factors other than N, such as precipitation and temperature at critical growth stages, are limiting response to N in the region. What effect did applied N have on sunflower seed oil content? Sunflower seed oil content was significantly reduced by increasing addition of N. The decline in oil content due to increased rate of N fertilizer application was comparable across all yield goals. Did application of P influence seed yield or oil content? The influence of P on both seed yield and seed oil content was not significant in this experiment. This lack of response to applied P may be explained by the level of soil P that was medium to high available P in more than 80% of the site‐years. Should growers stop applying N and P fertilizers to sunflower grown as an alternate crop in wheat‐fallow rotation? The results of this study show no yield benefit from application of N and P fertilizers for the yield range obtained at 37 site‐years in the region. More importantly, at the yield level of up to 1900 lb obtained in this study, profit will be affected negatively by the declining oil content of the seed without any improved yield from the applied N fertilizers. The great variability in sunflower seed yield and lack of response to N and P fertilizers, regardless of the soil N and P status, indicate that growing condition factors other than N or P fertilization influence the yield and seed quality of sunflower. These factors may include plant population, moisture, temperature, early frost conditions at critical stages during the growing season, and type of sunflower cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application did not influence sunflower seed yield.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P did not influence sunflower seed yield and oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application did not influence sunflower oil content.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P did not influence sunflower seed yield and oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N rates beyond 35 lb/acre did not influence seed yield in 80% of site-years.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
N beyond 35 lb/acree0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
site‐yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of N beyond 35 lb/acre did not influence seed yield in 80% of the site‐years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N significantly reduced percentage seed oil content.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
increasing levels of Ne0
Outcome
percentage seed oil contente0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
most site‐yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage seed oil content was reduced significantly by increasing levels of N for most site‐years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N–oil relationship statistic was 0.96 for high yield goals.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
N levelse0
Outcome
oil contente0
Value
0.96e0
Qualifier
highe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between the N levels and oil content had an 13 value of 0.96 for the high, 0.93 for the medium, and 0.94 for the low yield goals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N–oil relationship statistic was 0.93 for medium yield goals.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
N levelse0
Outcome
oil contente0
Value
0.93e0
Qualifier
mediume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between the N levels and oil content had an 13 value of 0.96 for the high, 0.93 for the medium, and 0.94 for the low yield goals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N–oil relationship statistic was 0.94 for low yield goals.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
N levelse0
Outcome
oil contente0
Value
0.94e0
Qualifier
lowe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between the N levels and oil content had an 13 value of 0.96 for the high, 0.93 for the medium, and 0.94 for the low yield goals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrate did not significantly influence seed yield.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Compound
nitratee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
did not significantly influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual nitrate level did not significantly influence either the seed yield or the seed oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrate did not significantly influence seed oil content.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Compound
nitratee0
Outcome
seed oil contente0
Direction
did not significantly influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual nitrate level did not significantly influence either the seed yield or the seed oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer increased chlorophyll meter readings at six site-years.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
N fertilizerse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll meter readingse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
six site‐yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll meter readings increased with application of N fertilizers at six site‐years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N did not significantly affect yield at sites with higher chlorophyll readings.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
did not Significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, at these sites N did not Significantly affect seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1738 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower yields varied greatly.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highly variablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields were highly variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing season did not significantly affect yield.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0
Setting
growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields were highly variable and not significantly affected by the growing season, total precipitation, or soil moisture content at time of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total precipitation did not significantly affect yield.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0
Setting
total precipitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields were highly variable and not significantly affected by the growing season, total precipitation, or soil moisture content at time of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture at planting did not significantly affect yield.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0
Setting
soil moisture content at time of plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields were highly variable and not significantly affected by the growing season, total precipitation, or soil moisture content at time of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N and P applications were judged not to produce economic returns in the region.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
fertilizer N and P applicatione0
Outcome
not producing economic returnse0
Setting
the regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer N and P application in the region is not producing economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

81 papers: 79 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

196 papers: 182 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 182 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

192 papers more in this group

See all 196 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.