Paper · 2000 · Seibutsu kankyō chōsetsu/Seibutsu kankyou chousetsu

Effect of Water Stress on Flowering of 'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees.

Naoto IWASAKI; Kousei HAYASAKI; Shinichiro TANAKA

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effect of water stress on flowering of ‘Meiwa’ kumquat trees (Fortunella crassifolia Swingle) was examined to establish a cultivation system for the first-flush flowers. Water stress was established by withholding water until the soil water content reached 45% for moderate water stress treatment, and 35% for severe water stress treatment. Although three sequential flowerings were observed on the control trees, only one flowering was observed on the water-stressed trees. In the control plot, flowering of the first-flush flowers began on 28 June, and about 10 flowers opened per day. Flowering of the second-flush flowers began on 6 July and the number of flowers opened per day reached 300. In moderate water stress treatment, flowering began on 25 June, and lasted until late July without interruption. Therefore, it was difficult to distinguish between the first- to third-flush flowers. In severe water stress treatment, flowering of the first-flush flowers began on 28 June and the number of flowers opened per day reached more than 200. Water stress did not affect fruit growth or quality of fruit. These results indicate that the number of first-flush flowers increases under water stress after termination of new shoot growth and that the required duration of water stress is about 2 weeks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-stressed trees had one flowering versus three sequential flowerings in controls.

Taxon
'Meiwa' Kumquat Treest0
Treatment
water-stressede0
Outcome
floweringse0
Direction
only onee0
Value
onee0
Comparator
control treese0

Verbatim

t0

“'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Although three sequential flowerings were observed on the control trees, only one flowering was observed on the water-stressed trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–474 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control trees began first-flush flowering on 28 June with about 10 flowers opening daily.

Taxon
'Meiwa' Kumquat Treest0
Treatment
control plote0
Outcome
flowering of the first-flush flowerse0
Value
28 Junee0
Qualifier
about 10 flowers opened per daye0

Verbatim

t0

“'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the control plot, flowering of the first-flush flowers began on 28 June, and about 10 flowers opened per day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control trees began second-flush flowering on 6 July and reached 300 opened flowers daily.

Taxon
'Meiwa' Kumquat Treest0
Organ / stage
second-flush flowerse0
Outcome
number of flowers opened per daye0
Value
300e0
Qualifier
6 Julye0

Verbatim

t0

“'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flowering of the second-flush flowers began on 6 July and the number of flowers opened per day reached 300.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–695 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate water stress, flowering began on 25 June and continued until late July without interruption.

Taxon
'Meiwa' Kumquat Treest0
Treatment
moderate water stress treatmente0
Outcome
floweringe0
Qualifier
began on 25 June, and lasted until late July without interruptione0

Verbatim

t0

“'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“In moderate water stress treatment, flowering began on 25 June, and lasted until late July without interruption.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–808 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate stress, first- through third-flush flowers were difficult to distinguish.

Taxon
'Meiwa' Kumquat Treest0
Outcome
difficult to distinguish between the first- to third-flush flowerse0

Verbatim

t0

“'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Therefore, it was difficult to distinguish between the first- to third-flush flowers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–894 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe water stress, first-flush flowering began on 28 June and daily flower opening exceeded 200.

Taxon
'Meiwa' Kumquat Treest0
Treatment
severe water stress treatmente0
Outcome
number of flowers opened per daye0
Value
more than 200e0
Qualifier
began on 28 Junee0

Verbatim

t0

“'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“In severe water stress treatment, flowering of the first-flush flowers began on 28 June and the number of flowers opened per day reached more than 200.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress did not affect fruit growth or quality.

Taxon
'Meiwa' Kumquat Treest0
Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
fruit growth or quality of fruite0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water stress did not affect fruit growth or quality of fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that water stress after new shoot growth increases first-flush flower number.

Taxon
'Meiwa' Kumquat Treest0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
number of first-flush flowerse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
after termination of new shoot growthe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“the number of first-flush flowers increases under water stress after termination of new shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1237 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors estimated that water stress needs to last about two weeks.

Taxon
'Meiwa' Kumquat Treest0
Outcome
required duration of water stresse0
Value
about 2 weekse0

Verbatim

t0

“'Meiwa' Kumquat Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“the required duration of water stress is about 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1301 · show in text ↑

drought · phenology · Citrus japonica (meiwa kumquat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.