Paper · 2008 · Journal of Agriculture Forestry and the Social Sciences

Effect Of Bird Manure On Cotton Plants Grown On Soils Sampled From Faidherbia Albida Park Land In Burkina Faso Sudanian Zone

S N Antoine; R Ouola; C Pane; et al.

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The current study estimates the contribution of avifauna and cropping system to soil fertility improvement in Faidherbia albida parkland. Pot experiment was carried out in a greenhouse in the research center of Farako-Bâ. The soils used in the experiment were sampled in a Faidherbia albida parkland at Dossi, a village located in the cotton production zone of western Burkina Faso. Bird manure was collected under Faidherbia albida trees and its effects on cotton growth and development was determined using daily measurements in the pots. Chemical analysis showed that bird manure contained important quantities of organic matter (57.5%) and nitrogen (7.2%) but lower quantities of phosphorus (1.3%) and potassium (1%). Cotton plant had a better development and growth when bird manure was only applied to soil or combined with mineral fertilizer and when cotton was grown on a soil where the previous crops were cereals (maize or sorghum). Planting cotton on a soil where the previous crop grown was maize or sorghum had no significant effect on the increase of cotton generative branches. Growing cotton on soil sampled under tree crown or on soil previously cropped with sorghum or chemical fertilization all showed positive effect on the number of cotton plant flower buds. Keywords: Faidherbia albida; avifauna; bird manure; soil; fertility; cottonJOAFSS Vol. 4 (1) 2006: pp. 114-126

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bird manure contained 57.5% organic matter.

Outcome
organic mattere0
Value
57.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bird manure contained important quantities of organic matter (57.5%) and nitrogen (7.2%) but lower quantities of phosphorus (1.3%) and potassium (1%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bird manure contained 7.2% nitrogen.

Outcome
nitrogene0
Value
7.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bird manure contained important quantities of organic matter (57.5%) and nitrogen (7.2%) but lower quantities of phosphorus (1.3%) and potassium (1%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bird manure contained 1.3% phosphorus.

Outcome
phosphoruse0
Value
1.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bird manure contained important quantities of organic matter (57.5%) and nitrogen (7.2%) but lower quantities of phosphorus (1.3%) and potassium (1%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bird manure contained 1% potassium.

Outcome
potassiume0
Value
1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bird manure contained important quantities of organic matter (57.5%) and nitrogen (7.2%) but lower quantities of phosphorus (1.3%) and potassium (1%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bird manure alone improved cotton development and growth.

Treatment
bird manure was only applied to soile0
Outcome
development and growthe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plant had a better development and growth when bird manure was only applied to soil or combined with mineral fertilizer and when cotton was grown on a soil where the previous crops were cereals (maize or sorghum).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bird manure combined with mineral fertilizer improved cotton development and growth.

Treatment
combined with mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
development and growthe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plant had a better development and growth when bird manure was only applied to soil or combined with mineral fertilizer and when cotton was grown on a soil where the previous crops were cereals (maize or sorghum).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous cereal cropping improved cotton development and growth.

Treatment
previous crops were cereals (maize or sorghum)e0
Outcome
development and growthe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plant had a better development and growth when bird manure was only applied to soil or combined with mineral fertilizer and when cotton was grown on a soil where the previous crops were cereals (maize or sorghum).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous maize cropping did not significantly increase cotton generative branches.

Treatment
maizee0
Outcome
cotton generative branchese0
Direction
no significant effect on the increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting cotton on a soil where the previous crop grown was maize or sorghum had no significant effect on the increase of cotton generative branches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous sorghum cropping did not significantly increase cotton generative branches.

Treatment
sorghume0
Outcome
cotton generative branchese0
Direction
no significant effect on the increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting cotton on a soil where the previous crop grown was maize or sorghum had no significant effect on the increase of cotton generative branches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil sampled under the tree crown increased cotton flower bud number.

Treatment
soil sampled under tree crowne0
Outcome
number of cotton plant flower budse0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growing cotton on soil sampled under tree crown or on soil previously cropped with sorghum or chemical fertilization all showed positive effect on the number of cotton plant flower buds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior sorghum cropping increased cotton flower bud number.

Treatment
soil previously cropped with sorghume0
Outcome
number of cotton plant flower budse0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growing cotton on soil sampled under tree crown or on soil previously cropped with sorghum or chemical fertilization all showed positive effect on the number of cotton plant flower buds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilization increased cotton flower bud number.

Treatment
chemical fertilizatione0
Outcome
number of cotton plant flower budse0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growing cotton on soil sampled under tree crown or on soil previously cropped with sorghum or chemical fertilization all showed positive effect on the number of cotton plant flower buds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1279 · show in text ↑

Sorghum · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Zea mays · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

rotation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.