Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

The Symbiotic Performance and Plant Nutrient Uptake of Certain Nationally Registered Chickpea (Cicer ArietinumL.) Cultivars of Turkey

Erdal Elkoca; Tulin Kocli; Adem Gunes; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars (‘Çakır’, ‘Işık-05’, ‘Canıtez-87’, ‘Hisar’, ‘Yaşa-05’, ‘Azkan’, ‘Küsmen-99’, ‘Gökçe’, ‘Damla-89’, ‘Diyar-95’, ‘Aziziye-94’, and ‘İzmir-92’) in Turkey. Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%, nodule weight by 257%, plant height by 6%, shoot dry weight by 12%, root dry weight by 21%, chlorophyll content by 4.2%, nitogen (N)% by 7.9%, and total N by 22.7%. Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%. The macro- and micronutrient uptake of cultivars significantly correlated with their nitrogen content and the magnitude of response to inoculation in relation to nodulation, plant growth, nitrogen fixation, and nutrient uptake significantly varied among cultivars. Based on the amount of fixed N and plant nutrient uptake, ‘Azkan’, ‘Aziziye-94’, ‘Küsmen-99’, ‘Diyar-95’, and ‘Hisar’ were the genotypes with the most positive response to inoculation. Our data showed that nodulation, nitrogen fixation, plant dry matter production, and macro- and micronutrient uptake of the inoculated chickpea can be improved by selecting the best compatible cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with Mesorhizobium cicerie1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie1symbiont
Outcome
average nodule numbere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
687%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%, nodule weight by 257%, plant height by 6%, shoot dry weight by 12%, root dry weight by 21%, chlorophyll content by 4.2%, nitogen (N)% by 7.9%, and total N by 22.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased nodule weight by 257%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with Mesorhizobium cicerie1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie1symbiont
Outcome
nodule weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
257%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%, nodule weight by 257%, plant height by 6%, shoot dry weight by 12%, root dry weight by 21%, chlorophyll content by 4.2%, nitogen (N)% by 7.9%, and total N by 22.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased plant height by 6%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with Mesorhizobium cicerie1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie1symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%, nodule weight by 257%, plant height by 6%, shoot dry weight by 12%, root dry weight by 21%, chlorophyll content by 4.2%, nitogen (N)% by 7.9%, and total N by 22.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased shoot dry weight by 12%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with Mesorhizobium cicerie1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie1symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
12%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%, nodule weight by 257%, plant height by 6%, shoot dry weight by 12%, root dry weight by 21%, chlorophyll content by 4.2%, nitogen (N)% by 7.9%, and total N by 22.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased root dry weight by 21%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with Mesorhizobium cicerie1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie1symbiont
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%, nodule weight by 257%, plant height by 6%, shoot dry weight by 12%, root dry weight by 21%, chlorophyll content by 4.2%, nitogen (N)% by 7.9%, and total N by 22.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased chlorophyll content by 4.2%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with Mesorhizobium cicerie1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie1symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4.2%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%, nodule weight by 257%, plant height by 6%, shoot dry weight by 12%, root dry weight by 21%, chlorophyll content by 4.2%, nitogen (N)% by 7.9%, and total N by 22.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased nitrogen (N)% by 7.9%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with Mesorhizobium cicerie1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie1symbiont
Outcome
nitogen (N)%e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
7.9%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%, nodule weight by 257%, plant height by 6%, shoot dry weight by 12%, root dry weight by 21%, chlorophyll content by 4.2%, nitogen (N)% by 7.9%, and total N by 22.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased total N by 22.7%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with Mesorhizobium cicerie1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie1symbiont
Outcome
total Ne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
22.7%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri increased the average nodule number by 687%, nodule weight by 257%, plant height by 6%, shoot dry weight by 12%, root dry weight by 21%, chlorophyll content by 4.2%, nitogen (N)% by 7.9%, and total N by 22.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased sulfur (S) uptake by 14.4% averaged across cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
sulfur (S)e2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Value
14.4%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased phosphorus (P) uptake by 1.9% averaged across cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
phosphorus (P)e2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Value
1.9%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased magnesium (Mg) uptake by 13.8% averaged across cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
magnesium (Mg)e2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Value
13.8%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased potassium (K) uptake by 6.2% averaged across cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
potassium (K)e2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Value
6.2%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased calcium (Ca) uptake by 17.4% averaged across cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
calcium (Ca)e2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Value
17.4%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased copper (Cu) uptake by 4.5% averaged across cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
copper (Cu)e2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Value
4.5%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased iron (Fe) uptake by 16.5% averaged across cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
iron (Fe)e2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Value
16.5%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased manganese (Mn) uptake by 10.9% averaged across cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
manganese (Mn)e2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Value
10.9%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4% averaged across cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
zinc (Zn) uptakee2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Value
9.4%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across chickpea cultivars, inoculation also significantly increased sulfur (S) by 14.4%, phosphorus (P) by 1.9%, magnesium (Mg) by 13.8%, potassium (K) by 6.2%, calcium (Ca) by 17.4%, copper (Cu) by 4.5%, iron (Fe) by 16.5%, manganese (Mn) by 10.9% and zinc (Zn) uptake by 9.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–856 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Macro- and micronutrient uptake of cultivars significantly correlated with their nitrogen content.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
cultivarse3
Outcome
macro- and micronutrient uptakee3
Direction
significantly correlatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e3

“The macro- and micronutrient uptake of cultivars significantly correlated with their nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–959 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best-responding cultivars Azkan, Aziziye-94, Kusmen-99, Diyar-95 and Hisar were the genotypes with the most positive response to inoculation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
‘Azkan’, ‘Aziziye-94’, ‘Küsmen-99’, ‘Diyar-95’, and ‘Hisar’e4
Outcome
response to inoculatione4
Qualifier
Based on the amount of fixed N and plant nutrient uptakee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e4

“Based on the amount of fixed N and plant nutrient uptake, ‘Azkan’, ‘Aziziye-94’, ‘Küsmen-99’, ‘Diyar-95’, and ‘Hisar’ were the genotypes with the most positive response to inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1306 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nodulation, nitrogen fixation and nutrient uptake of inoculated chickpea can be improved by selecting the best compatible cultivar.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
selecting the best compatible cultivare5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions to test the symbiotic performance and plant nutrient uptake of the twelve nationally registered chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
e5

“can be improved by selecting the best compatible cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1509 · show in text ↑

Mesorhizobium ciceri · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Mesorhizobium ciceri · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Mesorhizobium ciceri · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.