Paper · 2014 · Grass and Forage Science

The potential of nitric oxide for reducing oxidative damage induced by drought stress in two turfgrass species, creeping bentgrass and tall fescue

A. Hatamzadeh; A. Molaahmad Nalousi; M. Ghasemnezhad; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Drought stress is a major factor‐limiting grass growth. The production of reactive oxygen species ( ROS ) increases under stress conditions and causes cell oxidative damage. This study investigated the effect of sodium nitroprusside [a nitric oxide ( NO ) donor] treatment on drought stress in two turfgrass species, creeping bentgrass and tall fescue. Physiological characteristics such as relative water content ( RWC ), ion leakage, chlorophyll and proline content, and activity of superoxide dismutase ( SOD ), ascorbate peroxidase ( APX ) and catalase ( CAT ) were evaluated after 40 d drought stress and in the recovery stage. Results showed that nitric oxide ( NO ) treatment, especially 150 μ m , could maintain significantly higher RWC and reduce ion leakage under drought stress conditions in both species. Furthermore, both turfgrass species showed higher chlorophyll and proline content after drought stress period when sprayed with NO , while chlorophyll and proline content of control plants declined. Drought stress significantly reduced SOD and APX activity, while NO treatment induced higher SOD and APX activity under drought conditions. After recovery, leaf RWC returned to the control level; however, NO ‐sprayed plants showed higher RWC compared to controls. Both turfgrass species exhibited lower chlorophyll content at the recovery stage when exposed to severe drought stress, and NO application increased chlorophyll content compared to controls. No significant differences were found between NO treatment and control plants for proline and SOD activity, but APX activity of NO ‐sprayed plants was higher than in the control plants. These results suggest that foliar application of NO may alleviate drought stress in turfgrass by maintaining membrane stability and inducing antioxidant enzyme activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitric oxide maintained higher relative water content during drought.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
nitric oxide ( NO ) treatment, especially 150 μ me0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitric oxide ( NO ) treatment, especially 150 μ m , could maintain significantly higher RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitric oxide reduced ion leakage under drought.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
nitric oxidet0
Outcome
ion leakagee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduce ion leakage under drought stress conditions in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitric oxide for reducing oxidative damage induced by drought stress in two turfgrass species, creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO spray increased chlorophyll and proline content after drought relative to controls.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
sprayed with NOe0
Outcome
chlorophyll and proline contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both turfgrass species showed higher chlorophyll and proline content after drought stress period when sprayed with NO , while chlorophyll and proline content of control plants declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced SOD and APX activity.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
SOD and APX activitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced SOD and APX activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO increased SOD and APX activity during drought.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
NO treatmente0
Outcome
SOD and APX activitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO treatment induced higher SOD and APX activity under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf relative water content returned to control level after recovery.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Outcome
leaf RWCe0
Direction
returned to the control levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After recovery, leaf RWC returned to the control level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO-sprayed plants had higher relative water content after recovery than controls.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
NO ‐sprayede0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO ‐sprayed plants showed higher RWC compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe drought lowered chlorophyll at recovery.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
severe drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both turfgrass species exhibited lower chlorophyll content at the recovery stage when exposed to severe drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO increased chlorophyll during recovery relative to controls.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
NO applicatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO application increased chlorophyll content compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NO and control plants did not differ significantly in proline or SOD activity at recovery.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
NO treatmente0
Outcome
proline and SOD activitye0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were found between NO treatment and control plants for proline and SOD activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO-sprayed plants had higher APX activity after recovery.

Taxon
creeping bentgrass and tall fescueLolium arundinaceumAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
NO ‐sprayede0
Outcome
APX activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“APX activity of NO ‐sprayed plants was higher than in the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“creeping bentgrass and tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑

nitric oxide · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.