Paper · 1992 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Nitrogen Movement in an Arable Sandy Soil and Ways of Reducing Nitrogen Losses — Preliminary Results*

H. Herzog; R. Konrad

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In order to reduce nitrogen leaching during the autumn‐winter period and to test methods for quantifying leaching processes, a field trial was performed on a sandy soil at the experimental station in Berlin‐Dahlem. Treatments comprised different tillage managements (10 cm rotary hoe vs. 25 cm plough), fallow vs. growing winter rape as a catch crop, and different nitrogen applications (0, 50, 100 kg/ha N). Effects were appraised by simple nitrogen balance, determination of N min and nitrate concentrations in the soil water. First attempts were made to assess water flows in the soil monitoring matric water potentials. The catch crop took up about 55 kg/ha N and was by far most efficient in reducing N min and nitrate concentrations of the soil; moreover, the beginning of water movement in the soil was considerably delayed. The addition of 50 or 100 kg/ha N stimulated growth and N‐uptake by the catch crop, but revealed no obvious advantage in N‐conservation in the soil, besides a 3‐day‐retardation of leaching. N min in May as well as plant data of the following spring wheat indicated a poor efficiency of autumn‐applied nitrogen. Reduced tillage on the fallow decreased N min and nitrate concentrations, but such effect was hardly detectable in combination with the catch crop (due to its impact on growth and N‐uptake). Zusammenfassung Stickstoffverlagerung auf einem sandigen Ackerboden und Möglichkeiten zur Minderung von Verlusten — vorläufige Ergebnisse Mit dem Ziel N‐Verlagerung im Herbst— Winter zu verringern und Methoden der Quantifizierung des Verlagerungsprozesses zu testen, wurde ein erster Feldversuch auf einem Sandboden der Versuchsstation in Dahlem angelegt. Die Maßnahmen umfaßten Bodenbearbeitung (10 cm flaches Fräsen und 25 cm tiefes Pflügen), Brache und Zwischenfruchtanbau mit Winterraps sowie 0, 50 und 100 kg/ha N‐Düngung. Die Wirkungen wurden anhand einer vereinfachten N‐Bilanz, Bestimmungen von N min sowie Nitrat der Bodenlösung überprüft. Einen ersten Ansatz, den Wasserfluß im Boden zu erfassen, bildete die Ermittlung der matrikalen Wasserpotentiale. Die Zwischenfrucht nahm ca. 55 kg/ha N auf und minderte die N min ‐ und Nitratwerte im Boden am effektivsten, darüber hinaus verzögerte sie den Beginn der Wasserbewegung im Herbst erheblich. Eine Düngung mit 50 oder 100 kg/ha N förderte Wachstum und N‐Aufnahme der Zwischenfrucht, aber bedingte außer einer 3tägigen Verzögerung der Verlagerung keine Vorteile bei der N‐Konser‐vierung. N min im Mai und Pflanzendaten der Nachfrucht wiesen auf eine schlechte Effizienz dieser N‐Düngung. Reduzierte Bodenbearbeitung senkte die N min ‐ und Nitratkonzentration unter Brache leicht, nicht jedoch bei Zwischenfruchtanbau.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter rape catch crop took up about 55 kg/ha nitrogen.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
catch crop took upe0
Value
about 55 kg/ha Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The catch crop took up about 55 kg/ha N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The catch crop reduced soil mineral nitrogen and nitrate concentrations most effectively.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
catch crope0
Outcome
N min and nitrate concentrations of the soile0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The catch crop took up about 55 kg/ha N and was by far most efficient in reducing N min and nitrate concentrations of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The catch crop delayed onset of soil water movement.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
catch cropt1
Outcome
beginning of water movement in the soile0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the beginning of water movement in the soil was considerably delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–342 · show in text ↑
t1

“The catch crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added nitrogen stimulated catch crop growth.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
50 or 100 kg/ha Ne0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–342 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of 50 or 100 kg/ha N stimulated growth and N‐uptake by the catch crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added nitrogen stimulated catch crop nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
50 or 100 kg/ha Ne0
Outcome
N‐uptakee0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–342 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of 50 or 100 kg/ha N stimulated growth and N‐uptake by the catch crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added nitrogen gave no obvious soil nitrogen conservation advantage.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
50 or 100 kg/ha Nt1
Outcome
N‐conservation in the soile0
Direction
no obvious advantagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–342 · show in text ↑
e0

“revealed no obvious advantage in N‐conservation in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–988 · show in text ↑
t1

“50 or 100 kg/ha N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added nitrogen retarded leaching by three days.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
50 or 100 kg/ha Nt1
Outcome
leachinge0
Direction
retardatione0
Value
3‐daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–342 · show in text ↑
e0

“a 3‐day‐retardation of leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1029 · show in text ↑
t1

“50 or 100 kg/ha N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant data from following spring wheat indicated poor efficiency of autumn nitrogen.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
poor efficiency of autumn‐applied nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant data of the following spring wheat indicated a poor efficiency of autumn‐applied nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage on fallow decreased soil mineral nitrogen and nitrate.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
Reduced tillagee0
Outcome
N min and nitrate concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–342 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reduced tillage on the fallow decreased N min and nitrate concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage effect was hardly detectable with the catch crop.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
catch crope0
Outcome
such effect was hardly detectablee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–342 · show in text ↑
e0

“such effect was hardly detectable in combination with the catch crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1298 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 46 positive, 7 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 65 positive, 17 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.