Paper · 1986 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Residual values of zinc sulfate and acidifying (elemental) sulfur for rice on the alkaline Cununurra soils of the Ord Irrigation Area, Western Australia

AL Chapman; KM Cellier

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The residual values of zinc sulfate and acidifying (elemental) sulfur (S) for rice on Cununurra clay were investigated at Kimberley Research Station, near Kununurra in the Ord Irrigation Area, Western Australia. Successive crops were grown on 2 sites showing different degrees of zinc (Zn) deficiency according to visual symptoms. Despite the marked response to Zn fertiliser shown by the first crop of IR665-24-1 rice on the more deficient site (previously fallow for 12 months) there was no significant yield response to applied Zn in the third crop. On the less Zn deficient site (previously under weeds for several years), IR661-1-170-1-3 rice showed no response to Zn fertiliser although transient symptoms occurred in the first and second crops. Continuous cropping per se apparently reduced the severity of Zn deficiency on both sites, thus negating attempts to estimate the residual value of Zn fertiliser. The 2 sites were not distinguishable by the EDTAammonium carbonate soil test for Zn. Extractable Zn increased with increasing level of Zn fertiliser, but plant response was not related to extractable Zn. Application of elemental S (1-4 t ha-1) had no effect on extractable Zn levels before sowing of rice. Increased rice yields due to acidifying S were confirmed, but the residual effects did not extend beyond the fourth crop. In each of the 3 seasons following S application, the yield of IR661-1-170-1-3 increased by 0.3-0.6 t ha-1 but, at current prices, the use of S as a soil ameliorant for rice in the Ord Irrigation Area would be uneconomic.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first IR665-24-1 crop responded markedly to Zn fertilizer on the more deficient site.

Material
IR665-24-1e0
Treatment
Zn fertilisere0
Outcome
response to Zn fertilisere0
Qualifier
more deficient sitee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“marked response to Zn fertiliser shown by the first crop of IR665-24-1 rice on the more deficient site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The third rice crop on the more deficient site had no significant yield response to applied Zn.

Treatment
applied Zne0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Direction
no significante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant yield response to applied Zn in the third crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR661-1-170-1-3 rice showed no response to Zn fertilizer on the less deficient site.

Material
IR661-1-170-1-3e0
Treatment
Zn fertilisere0
Outcome
response to Zn fertilisere0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“IR661-1-170-1-3 rice showed no response to Zn fertiliser although transient symptoms occurred in the first and second crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–750 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient Zn deficiency symptoms occurred in the first and second crops.

Outcome
transient symptomse0
Qualifier
first and second cropse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“transient symptoms occurred in the first and second crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–750 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous cropping apparently reduced Zn deficiency severity on both sites.

Treatment
Continuous croppinge0
Outcome
severity of Zn deficiencye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
on both sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Continuous cropping per se apparently reduced the severity of Zn deficiency on both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–841 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil Zn test did not distinguish the two sites.

Outcome
not distinguishablee0
Comparator
2 sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The 2 sites were not distinguishable by the EDTAammonium carbonate soil test for Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable Zn increased with Zn fertilizer level.

Treatment
Zn fertilisere0
Outcome
Extractable Zne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Extractable Zn increased with increasing level of Zn fertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1063 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant response was not related to extractable Zn.

Compound
extractable Zne0
Outcome
plant responsee0
Direction
not relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant response was not related to extractable Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental S had no effect on extractable Zn before rice sowing.

Treatment
elemental S (1-4 t ha-1)e0
Outcome
extractable Zn levelse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of elemental S (1-4 t ha-1) had no effect on extractable Zn levels before sowing of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidifying S increased rice yield.

Treatment
acidifying Se0
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increased rice yields due to acidifying S were confirmed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual benefit of acidifying S ended by the fourth crop.

Outcome
residual effectse0
Direction
did not extende0
Qualifier
beyond the fourth crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“the residual effects did not extend beyond the fourth crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In each of three seasons after S application, IR661-1-170-1-3 yield increased by 0.3-0.6 t ha-1.

Material
IR661-1-170-1-3e0
Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.3-0.6 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“In each of the 3 seasons following S application, the yield of IR661-1-170-1-3 increased by 0.3-0.6 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1449 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At current prices, elemental S was considered uneconomic as a soil ameliorant for rice in the Ord Irrigation Area.

Outcome
use of S as a soil ameliorant for rice in the Ord Irrigation Area would be uneconomice0
Setting
Ord Irrigation Areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“at current prices, the use of S as a soil ameliorant for rice in the Ord Irrigation Area would be uneconomic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1563 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

51 papers: 47 positive, 4 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

276 papers: 254 positive, 22 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

272 papers more in this group

See all 276 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 389 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.