Abstract
Net photosynthetic rate (P N) measured at the same CO2 concentration, the maximum in vivo carboxylation rate, and contents of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBPCO) and RuBPCO activase were significantly decreased, but the maximum in vivo electron transport rate and RuBP content had no significant change in CO2-enriched [EC, about 200 µmol mol-1 above the ambient CO2 concentration (AC)] wheat leaves compared with those in AC grown wheat leaves. Hence photosynthetic acclimation in wheat leaves to EC is largely due to RuBP carboxylation limitation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthetic rate decreased significantly under CO2 enrichment.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- CO2-enrichede0
- Outcome
- Net photosynthetic ratee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 200 µmol mol-1e0
- Comparator
- AC grown wheat leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Net photosynthetic rate (P N) measured at the same CO2 concentration, the maximum in vivo carboxylation rate, and contents of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBPCO) and RuBPCO activase were significantly decreased, but the maximum in vivo electron transport rate and RuBP content had no significant change in CO2-enriched [EC, about 200 µmol mol-1 above the ambient CO2 concentration (AC)] wheat leaves compared with those in AC grown wheat leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum in vivo carboxylation rate decreased significantly under CO2 enrichment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- CO2-enrichede0
- Outcome
- maximum in vivo carboxylation ratee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- AC grown wheat leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum in vivo carboxylation rate, and contents of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBPCO) and RuBPCO activase were significantly decreased, but the maximum in vivo electron transport rate and RuBP content had no significant change in CO2-enriched [EC, about 200 µmol mol-1 above the ambient CO2 concentration (AC)] wheat leaves compared with those in AC grown wheat leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
RuBPCO content decreased significantly under CO2 enrichment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- CO2-enrichede0
- Gene
- RuBPCOe0
- Outcome
- contents of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBPCO)e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- AC grown wheat leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“contents of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBPCO) and RuBPCO activase were significantly decreased, but the maximum in vivo electron transport rate and RuBP content had no significant change in CO2-enriched [EC, about 200 µmol mol-1 above the ambient CO2 concentration (AC)] wheat leaves compared with those in AC grown wheat leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
RuBPCO activase content decreased significantly under CO2 enrichment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- CO2-enrichede0
- Gene
- RuBPCO activasee0
- Outcome
- RuBPCO activasee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- AC grown wheat leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RuBPCO activase were significantly decreased, but the maximum in vivo electron transport rate and RuBP content had no significant change in CO2-enriched [EC, about 200 µmol mol-1 above the ambient CO2 concentration (AC)] wheat leaves compared with those in AC grown wheat leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum in vivo electron transport rate did not change significantly under CO2 enrichment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- CO2-enrichede0
- Outcome
- maximum in vivo electron transport ratee0
- Direction
- no significant changee0
- Comparator
- AC grown wheat leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum in vivo electron transport rate and RuBP content had no significant change in CO2-enriched [EC, about 200 µmol mol-1 above the ambient CO2 concentration (AC)] wheat leaves compared with those in AC grown wheat leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
RuBP content did not change significantly under CO2 enrichment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- CO2-enrichede0
- Outcome
- RuBP contente0
- Direction
- no significant changee0
- Comparator
- AC grown wheat leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RuBP content had no significant change in CO2-enriched [EC, about 200 µmol mol-1 above the ambient CO2 concentration (AC)] wheat leaves compared with those in AC grown wheat leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 was attributed largely to RuBP carboxylation limitation.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic acclimatione0
- Qualifier
- RuBP carboxylation limitatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“photosynthetic acclimation in wheat leaves to EC is largely due to RuBP carboxylation limitation”
The same questions in other papers
co2 · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
93 papers more in this group
See all 97 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.