Abstract
Zn increased shoot dry matter yield of 62-day-old corn grown in the greenhouse on Almasippi loamy fine sand (Gleyed Carbonated Rego Black) containing 0.77 ppm DTPA-extractable Zn whereas corn in the field on the same soil had not responded to Zn. Soil mass or dimensions had little influence upon degree of response to Zn. When no Zn was applied, Zn uptake was not influenced by soil mass, suggesting that the amount of plant-available soil Zn did not increase with increasing soil mass. Results from this study provided little evidence that restricted soil mass, limiting the amount of available soil Zn, was the primary cause of greater response to Zn fertilization in pot as compared to field experiments. Key words: Corn, soil-mass, zinc
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc increased shoot dry matter yield of greenhouse corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Organ / stage
- shoote0
- Treatment
- Zne0
- Outcome
- shoot dry matter yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 62-day-olde0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Zn increased shoot dry matter yield of 62-day-old corn grown in the greenhouse on Almasippi loamy fine sand (Gleyed Carbonated Rego Black) containing 0.77 ppm DTPA-extractable Zn”
Claim · model-written summary
Field-grown corn on the same soil did not respond to zinc.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Zne0
- Outcome
- responded to Zne0
- Direction
- not respondede0
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corn in the field on the same soil had not responded to Zn.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil mass or dimensions had little effect on corn zinc response.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Soil mass or dimensionse0
- Outcome
- degree of response to Zne0
- Direction
- little influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil mass or dimensions had little influence upon degree of response to Zn.”
t0“CORN (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Without added zinc, corn zinc uptake did not vary with soil mass.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- soil masse0
- Outcome
- Zn uptakee0
- Direction
- not influencede0
- Qualifier
- When no Zn was appliede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When no Zn was applied, Zn uptake was not influenced by soil mass”
t0“CORN (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Restricted soil mass was poorly supported as the cause of the stronger pot response to zinc fertilization.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- greater response to Zn fertilizatione0
- Qualifier
- restricted soil mass, limiting the amount of available soil Zne0
- Comparator
- field experimentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results from this study provided little evidence that restricted soil mass, limiting the amount of available soil Zn, was the primary cause of greater response to Zn fertilization in pot as compared to field experiments.”
t0“CORN (Zea mays)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 199 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
231 papers more in this group
See all 235 papers →zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
437 papers more in this group
See all 441 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.