Paper · 2005 · Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science

The influence of Arbascular mycorrhizal on the reproduction of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)

OJ Oyetunji; O Osonubi

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Control experiment was conducted in the nursery of Botany and Microbiology Department, University of Ibadan to evaluate the influence of arbuscular-mycorrhizae (AM) fungi on the improvement of reproductive and productive potentials of bell pepper in sub-humid tropics. The experiment was a 2x4 factorial, arranged in complete randomized design with six replications. G. mosseae, G. etunicatum and dual inoculation of the two AM fungi were used to inoculate the pepper plants. Non-mycorrhizal inoculation served as control experiment. Glomus etunicatum significantly improved the biomass production in bell pepper and its fruiting potentials (66 and 100% respectively). G. etunicatum and dual inoculation also reduced the number of the abscised flowers and fruits. The plants inoculated with. G. etunicatum and dual inoculation maintained at least 75% of their fruits to maturity, while those inoculated with G. mosseae and control plants lost 100% of their fruits before maturity. The pepper was found to respond differently to the two Glomus spp. Dual inoculation of the plant with both AM fungi did not improve its fruiting potentials above the single inoculation with G. etunicatum (0.67 and 5.17 fruits respectively). Keywords: abortion, bell pepper, dual inoculation, flowering, fruiting, G. etunicatum, G. mosseae Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science Vol. 9 2005: 12-16

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus etunicatum significantly improved biomass production in bell pepper.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Glomus etunicatume1
Interactor
Glomus etunicatume1symbiont
Outcome
biomass productione1
Direction
improvede1
Value
66e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“reproduction of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glomus etunicatum significantly improved the biomass production in bell pepper and its fruiting potentials (66 and 100% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus etunicatum significantly improved the fruiting potentials of bell pepper.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Glomus etunicatume1
Interactor
Glomus etunicatume1symbiont
Outcome
fruiting potentialse1
Direction
improvede1
Value
100%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“reproduction of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glomus etunicatum significantly improved the biomass production in bell pepper and its fruiting potentials (66 and 100% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus etunicatum and dual inoculation reduced the number of abscised flowers and fruits of bell pepper.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
G. etunicatum and dual inoculatione2
Interactor
G. etunicatume2symbiont
Outcome
the number of the abscised flowers and fruitse2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“reproduction of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“G. etunicatum and dual inoculation also reduced the number of the abscised flowers and fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus etunicatum and dual inoculation maintained at least 75% of bell pepper fruits to maturity.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
G. etunicatum and dual inoculatione3
Interactor
G. etunicatume3symbiont
Outcome
their fruits to maturitye3
Direction
maintainede3
Value
75%e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“reproduction of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The plants inoculated with. G. etunicatum and dual inoculation maintained at least 75% of their fruits to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae inoculated plants lost 100% of their fruits before maturity.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
G. mosseaee4
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee4symbiont
Outcome
their fruits before maturitye4
Direction
loste4
Value
100%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“reproduction of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“those inoculated with G. mosseae and control plants lost 100% of their fruits before maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–979 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants lost 100% of their fruits before maturity.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Outcome
fruits before maturitye4
Value
100%e4
Qualifier
control plantse4

Verbatim

t0

“reproduction of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“those inoculated with G. mosseae and control plants lost 100% of their fruits before maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–979 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bell pepper responded differently to the two Glomus species.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
two Glomus spp.e6
Outcome
respond differentlye6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“reproduction of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–92 · show in text ↑
e6

“The pepper was found to respond differently to the two Glomus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation with both AM fungi did not improve fruiting potentials above single inoculation with G. etunicatum.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Dual inoculation of the plant with both AM fungie5
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae5symbiont
Outcome
fruiting potentialse5
Direction
did not improvee5
Value
0.67 and 5.17 fruitse5
Comparator
the single inoculation with G. etunicatume5

Verbatim

t0

“reproduction of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“Dual inoculation of the plant with both AM fungi did not improve its fruiting potentials above the single inoculation with G. etunicatum (0.67 and 5.17 fruits respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1220 · show in text ↑

Glomus · phenology · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · phenology · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.