Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Impact of Microbial Inoculants on the Performance of Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Varieties under Foot Hills of Eastern Himalayan Region

Ranjit Chatterjee; Sagar Koner; Suchand Datta

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was undertaken to study the influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties at UBKV, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. Treatments consisted of four bell pepper varieties viz, Mekong (V1), California Wonder (V2), J K Peeyali (V3) and Asha (V4), allotted in main plot whereas microbial inoculants treatments (with and without inoculation) were taken as sub plot. The pooled results indicated that seedling root dipping in microbial inoculants had enhanced the performance of bell pepper varieties. Days to 50% flowering and fruit maturity were advanced whereas fruit weight and yield were found superior in presence of microbial inoculants. The varietal performance showed that Mekong emerged as best in respect to number of fruits/plant and fruit yield whereas, Asha found best for individual fruit weight (84.82 g). The variety California wonder resulted excellent quality fruit in terms of highest beta carotene content and vitamin C content. The variety Asha in presence of microbial inoculants produced earliest flowering (83.71 days), fruit maturity (101.19 days) and highest fruit weight (92.16 g),where as the variety Mekong treated with microbial inoculants gave the maximum number of fruits/plant(10.02) and highest fruit yield (701.16 g/plant and 17.98 t/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling root dipping in microbial inoculants enhanced the performance of bell pepper varieties.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Treatment
seedling root dipping in microbial inoculantse1
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
performancee1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pooled results indicated that seedling root dipping in microbial inoculants had enhanced the performance of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculants advanced 50% flowering and fruit maturity in bell pepper.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Treatment
microbial inoculantse2
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
Days to 50% flowering and fruit maturitye2
Direction
advancede2
Comparator
without inoculatione3

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Days to 50% flowering and fruit maturity were advanced whereas fruit weight and yield were found superior in presence of microbial inoculants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–830 · show in text ↑
e3

“microbial inoculants treatments (with and without inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculants made fruit weight and yield superior in bell pepper.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Treatment
microbial inoculantse2
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
fruit weight and yielde2
Direction
superiore2
Comparator
without inoculatione3

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Days to 50% flowering and fruit maturity were advanced whereas fruit weight and yield were found superior in presence of microbial inoculants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–830 · show in text ↑
e3

“microbial inoculants treatments (with and without inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–529 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mekong was best for number of fruits per plant and fruit yield among the varieties.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Material
Mekonge4
Outcome
number of fruits/plant and fruit yielde4
Direction
beste4

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e4

“The varietal performance showed that Mekong emerged as best in respect to number of fruits/plant and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–944 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Asha was best for individual fruit weight, at 84.82 g.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Material
Ashae5
Outcome
individual fruit weighte5
Direction
beste5
Value
84.82 ge5

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e5

“Asha found best for individual fruit weight (84.82 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1007 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

California Wonder had the highest beta carotene and vitamin C content in its fruit.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Material
California wondere6
Outcome
beta carotene content and vitamin C contente6
Direction
higheste6

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e6

“The variety California wonder resulted excellent quality fruit in terms of highest beta carotene content and vitamin C content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Asha with microbial inoculants flowered earliest, at 83.71 days.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Material
Ashae7
Treatment
microbial inoculantse7
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
floweringe7
Direction
earlieste7
Value
83.71 dayse7

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e7

“The variety Asha in presence of microbial inoculants produced earliest flowering (83.71 days), fruit maturity (101.19 days) and highest fruit weight (92.16 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1295 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Asha with microbial inoculants reached fruit maturity at 101.19 days.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Material
Ashae7
Treatment
microbial inoculantse7
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
fruit maturitye7
Value
101.19 dayse7

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e7

“The variety Asha in presence of microbial inoculants produced earliest flowering (83.71 days), fruit maturity (101.19 days) and highest fruit weight (92.16 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1295 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Asha with microbial inoculants had the highest fruit weight, at 92.16 g.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Material
Ashae7
Treatment
microbial inoculantse7
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
fruit weighte7
Direction
higheste7
Value
92.16 ge7

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e7

“The variety Asha in presence of microbial inoculants produced earliest flowering (83.71 days), fruit maturity (101.19 days) and highest fruit weight (92.16 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1295 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mekong with microbial inoculants gave the maximum number of fruits per plant, 10.02.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Material
Mekonge7
Treatment
microbial inoculantse7
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
number of fruits/plante7
Direction
maximume7
Value
10.02e7

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e7

“The variety Asha in presence of microbial inoculants produced earliest flowering (83.71 days), fruit maturity (101.19 days) and highest fruit weight (92.16 g),where as the variety Mekong treated with microbial inoculants gave the maximum number of fruits/plant(10.02) and highest fruit yield (701.16 g/plant and 17.98 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1460 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mekong with microbial inoculants gave the highest fruit yield, 701.16 g/plant and 17.98 t/ha.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Material
Mekonge7
Treatment
microbial inoculantse7
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
fruit yielde7
Direction
higheste7
Value
701.16 g/plant and 17.98 t/hae7

Verbatim

e0

“influence of Azotobactor and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria containing microbial inoculants on the growth yield and quality of bell pepper varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–191 · show in text ↑
e7

“The variety Asha in presence of microbial inoculants produced earliest flowering (83.71 days), fruit maturity (101.19 days) and highest fruit weight (92.16 g),where as the variety Mekong treated with microbial inoculants gave the maximum number of fruits/plant(10.02) and highest fruit yield (701.16 g/plant and 17.98 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1460 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

inoculation · phenology · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.