Paper · 2010 · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

Hydrogen sulfide promotes wheat seed germination under osmotic stress

H. Zhang; M. J. Wang; L. Y. Hu; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
95
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of NaHS, H2S donor, on germination and antioxidant metabolism in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds under osmotic stress were investigated. With the enhancement of osmotic stress, which was mimicked by PEG-6000, the seed germination dropped gradually. NaHS treatment could promote wheat seed germination against osmotic stress in a dose-dependent manner; while Na+ and other sulfur-containing components, such as S2−, SO 4 2− , SO 3 2− , HSO 4 − and HSO 3 − , were not able to improve seed germination as NaHS did, confirming H2S or HS− derived from NaHS contribute to the protective roles. Further experiments showed that NaHS treatment combined with PEG enhanced the activities of amylase and esterase in comparison to PEG treatment alone. Alternatively, NaHS treatment significantly reduced malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in seeds. Significant enhancement of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities and decrease in lipoxygenase activity were observed in NaHS treated seeds, while peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities were not affected as compared with the control. Furthermore, the H2S donor treatment could retain higher levels of endogenous H2S in wheat seeds under osmotic stress. These data indicated that H2S played a protective role in wheat seed against osmotic stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing osmotic stress (PEG-6000) gradually reduced wheat seed germination.

Treatment
osmotic stresse1
Outcome
seed germinatione1
Direction
droppede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“With the enhancement of osmotic stress, which was mimicked by PEG-6000, the seed germination dropped gradually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS treatment promoted wheat seed germination under osmotic stress in a dose-dependent manner.

Treatment
NaHSe2
Outcome
seed germinatione2
Direction
promotee2
Qualifier
against osmotic stress in a dose-dependent mannere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“NaHS treatment could promote wheat seed germination against osmotic stress in a dose-dependent manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na+ and other sulfur-containing components did not improve wheat seed germination as NaHS did.

Treatment
Na+ and other sulfur-containing componentse3
Outcome
seed germinatione3
Direction
not able to improvee3
Comparator
NaHSe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“Na+ and other sulfur-containing components, such as S2−, SO 4 2− , SO 3 2− , HSO 4 − and HSO 3 − , were not able to improve seed germination as NaHS did”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS combined with PEG enhanced amylase and esterase activities in wheat seeds relative to PEG alone.

Treatment
NaHSe4
Outcome
activities of amylase and esterasee4
Direction
enhancede4
Comparator
PEG treatment alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e4

“NaHS treatment combined with PEG enhanced the activities of amylase and esterase in comparison to PEG treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS significantly reduced malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in wheat seeds under osmotic stress.

Treatment
NaHSe5
Outcome
malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide accumulatione5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e5

“NaHS treatment significantly reduced malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS significantly enhanced catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities in wheat seeds.

Treatment
NaHSe6
Outcome
catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activitiese6
Direction
enhancemente6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e6

“Significant enhancement of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities and decrease in lipoxygenase activity were observed in NaHS treated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS decreased lipoxygenase activity in wheat seeds.

Treatment
NaHSe6
Outcome
lipoxygenase activitye6
Direction
decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e6

“Significant enhancement of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities and decrease in lipoxygenase activity were observed in NaHS treated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS did not affect peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities in wheat seeds compared with the control.

Treatment
NaHSe6
Outcome
peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activitiese7
Direction
not affectede7
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e6

“Significant enhancement of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities and decrease in lipoxygenase activity were observed in NaHS treated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1008 · show in text ↑
e7

“peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities were not affected as compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The H2S donor treatment retained higher levels of endogenous H2S in wheat seeds under osmotic stress.

Treatment
H2S donor treatmente5
Outcome
levels of endogenous H2Se5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
under osmotic stresse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the H2S donor treatment could retain higher levels of endogenous H2S in wheat seeds under osmotic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1228 · show in text ↑

donor · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

hydrogen sulfide · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.