Paper · 1995 · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Influence of Rain Shelter and Site Preparation on Seedling Emergence ofPinus sylvestrisL. after Direct Seedling

Hans Winsa

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of altered moisture conditions on seedling emergence and establishment after direct seeding of Pinus sylvestris L. were studied for two seed‐lots in a field experiment. Seedling emergence and establishment were expressed as a percentage of seeded germinable seeds. Moisture conditions were altered by using rain shelters in combination with different site preparation methods with and without microsite preparation. When removal of the organic mat was used as a site preparation method, seedling emergence was 42.3% without rain shelters and 34.1% with rain shelters. For the same site preparation method, seedling emergence was 55.3% with microsite preparation and 21.4% without. When the ground organic mat was left on the soil the average seedling emergence was 29.4%. Grinding of the organic mat resulted in seedling emergence as good as removal of the organic mat, only in the absence of rain shelters and with microsite preparation. Irrespective of rain shelter or microsite preparation treatment, the site preparation method with the organic mat inverted in the seedbed resulted in almost no seedling emergence. Germination of wintering seeds during the second growing season was evident mainly in spots with ground organic material. In conclusion it seems that seedling emergence is dependent on the availability of capillary soil water.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With removal of the organic mat and no rain shelters, Pinus sylvestris seedling emergence was 42.3%.

Taxon
Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
removal of the organic mate0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Value
42.3%e0
Qualifier
without rain shelterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When removal of the organic mat was used as a site preparation method, seedling emergence was 42.3% without rain shelters and 34.1% with rain shelters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus sylvestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With removal of the organic mat, rain shelters were associated with lower Pinus sylvestris seedling emergence (34.1%) than no rain shelters.

Taxon
Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
with rain shelterse0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
34.1%e0
Comparator
without rain shelterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When removal of the organic mat was used as a site preparation method, seedling emergence was 42.3% without rain shelters and 34.1% with rain shelters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus sylvestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With the same site preparation, microsite preparation gave higher seedling emergence (55.3%) than none.

Taxon
Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
with microsite preparatione0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
55.3%e0
Comparator
withoute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the same site preparation method, seedling emergence was 55.3% with microsite preparation and 21.4% without”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus sylvestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without microsite preparation, seedling emergence was 21.4%.

Taxon
Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrist0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Value
21.4%e0
Qualifier
withoute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the same site preparation method, seedling emergence was 55.3% with microsite preparation and 21.4% without”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus sylvestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When the ground organic mat was left on the soil, average seedling emergence was 29.4%.

Taxon
Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
ground organic mat was left on the soile0
Outcome
average seedling emergencee0
Value
29.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the ground organic mat was left on the soil the average seedling emergence was 29.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus sylvestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grinding of the organic mat gave seedling emergence as good as removal of the mat only in the absence of rain shelters and with microsite preparation.

Taxon
Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
Grinding of the organic mate0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
as good ase0
Qualifier
only in the absence of rain shelters and with microsite preparatione0
Comparator
removal of the organic mate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grinding of the organic mat resulted in seedling emergence as good as removal of the organic mat, only in the absence of rain shelters and with microsite preparation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus sylvestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Site preparation with the organic mat inverted in the seedbed resulted in almost no seedling emergence.

Taxon
Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
organic mat inverted in the seedbede0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
almost noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the site preparation method with the organic mat inverted in the seedbed resulted in almost no seedling emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus sylvestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination of wintering seeds during the second growing season was mainly in spots with ground organic material.

Taxon
Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrist0
Outcome
Germination of wintering seedse0
Setting
spots with ground organic materiale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of wintering seeds during the second growing season was evident mainly in spots with ground organic material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus sylvestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that seedling emergence depends on the availability of capillary soil water.

Taxon
Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrist0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Qualifier
availability of capillary soil watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedling emergence is dependent on the availability of capillary soil water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus sylvestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑

rainfall · growth · Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.