Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Growth and yield of different varieties of chickpea (Cicer arietinuml.) as influenced by the phosphorus nutrition under rainfed conditions on vertisols

S. Neenu; K. Ramesh; S. Ramana; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out in Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal during the rabi season 2011–12 to study the effect of different doses of phosphorus on the growth and yield of different varieties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rainfed conditions in vertisols. The experiment was laid out in a Split plot design with three replications. There were four phosphorus levels viz., 0, 30, 60 and 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 and four varieties of chickpea viz., JG 16, JG 11, JG 315 and JG 218. Barring JG 11, application of phosphorus from 0 to 60 kg ha−1 resulted in a linear increase in yield and yield attributing characters in rest of the varieties. Although there was no significant difference in seed yield among the varieties, application of either 60 or 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 produced significantly higher seed yield over other doses of P. The application of phosphorus above 60 kg ha−1 has significantly increased the grain phosphorus content in all the four varieties but the interaction effect was not significant. A significant increase of grain phosphorus uptake with phosphorus nutrition was also observed in all the varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus from 0 to 60 kg ha−1 linearly increased yield and yield traits in varieties other than JG 11.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
phosphorus from 0 to 60 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
yield and yield attributing characterse0
Direction
linear increasee0
Qualifier
Barring JG 11e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barring JG 11, application of phosphorus from 0 to 60 kg ha−1 resulted in a linear increase in yield and yield attributing characters in rest of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield did not differ significantly among varieties.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in seed yield among the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 produced significantly higher seed yield than other doses.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
60e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other doses of Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of either 60 or 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 produced significantly higher seed yield over other doses of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 produced significantly higher seed yield than other doses.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
90 kg P2O5 ha−1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other doses of Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of either 60 or 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 produced significantly higher seed yield over other doses of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus above 60 kg ha−1 significantly increased grain phosphorus content in all four varieties.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
phosphorus above 60 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
grain phosphorus contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in all the four varietiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of phosphorus above 60 kg ha−1 has significantly increased the grain phosphorus content in all the four varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The variety by phosphorus interaction for grain phosphorus content was not significant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
interaction effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of phosphorus above 60 kg ha−1 has significantly increased the grain phosphorus content in all the four varieties but the interaction effect was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus nutrition significantly increased grain phosphorus uptake in all varieties.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
phosphorus nutritione0
Outcome
grain phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
in all the varietiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase of grain phosphorus uptake with phosphorus nutrition was also observed in all the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.