Paper · 2008 · Plant Production Science

Rice Uptake and Recovery of Nitrogen with Different Methods of Applying 15N-Labeled Chicken Manure and Ammonium Sulfate

Jingrong Liu; Qiufa Xie; Qinghua shi; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of different methods of fertilization on rice uptake and recovery of nitrogen were studied using 15N-lablled chicken manure (CM) and ammonium sulfate (AS). The results showed that the application method of totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizers can increase the N uptake by rice from the fertilizers. The N uptake from CM was obviously higher than that from AS. The N partitioning to rice grain was also higher than other application methods. The effect on increasing yield was obviously higher than the method of application of chemical fertilizers only. This method had such benefits as increasing N use efficiency, increasing N residue in soil and reducing N loss. High rice yield can be obtained while the soil fertility can be maintained with this method. So it is an effective and practical method of fertilization technique thus can be recommended to rice growers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Totally basal organic and inorganic fertilizer dressing increased rice nitrogen uptake from fertilizers.

Treatment
totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application method of totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizers can increase the N uptake by rice from the fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake from chicken manure was higher than from ammonium sulfate.

Treatment
chicken manuree2
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ammonium sulfatee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N uptake from CM was obviously higher than that from AS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice uptake and recovery of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“chicken manure (CM) and ammonium sulfate (AS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal dressing increased nitrogen partitioning to rice grain relative to other application methods.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome
N partitioninge0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other application methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N partitioning to rice grain was also higher than other application methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–475 · show in text ↑
e1

“totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal dressing increased yield more than chemical fertilizer alone.

Treatment
totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
application of chemical fertilizers onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect on increasing yield was obviously higher than the method of application of chemical fertilizers only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–588 · show in text ↑
e1

“totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal dressing increased nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This method had such benefits as increasing N use efficiency, increasing N residue in soil and reducing N loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal dressing increased nitrogen residue in soil.

Treatment
totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome
N residue in soile0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This method had such benefits as increasing N use efficiency, increasing N residue in soil and reducing N loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal dressing reduced nitrogen loss.

Treatment
totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome
N losse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This method had such benefits as increasing N use efficiency, increasing N residue in soil and reducing N loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method can obtain high rice yield while maintaining soil fertility.

Treatment
totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
Highe0
Qualifier
soil fertility can be maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High rice yield can be obtained while the soil fertility can be maintained with this method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–277 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the fertilization method to rice growers.

Outcome
totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizerse1
Qualifier
recommended to rice growerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“So it is an effective and practical method of fertilization technique thus can be recommended to rice growers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“totally basal dressing of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–277 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.