Paper · 1991 · Crop Science

Stem Infusion of Liquid Culture Medium Prevents Reproductive Failure of Maize at Low Water Potential

Mark G. Boyle; John S. Boyer; Page W. Morgan

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
165
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Maize ( Zea mays L.) plants exposed to low water potentials (ψ w ) at anthesis frequently experience failure of reproduction despite high plant ψ w before and after anthesis. Since the supply of reserve carbohydrates in maize stems may be low at anthesis and low ψ w can inhibit photosynthesis, it is possible that a water deficit at anthesis causes a deficit of photosynthetic products or their derivatives, which could lead to premature cessation of reproductive development. To test this hypothesis, a high‐sucrose (150 g L −1 liquid tissue culture medium was supplied to the stems of dehydrating maize plants from an external reservoir using a new stem infusion technique. Plants were grown in controlled environment chambers in large pots containing soil. At midday, the rates of net photosynthesis of upper leaves of well‐watered plants were ≈20 μmol m −2 s −1 and the ψ w of these leaves was −0.6 MPa. Approximately 5 d after water was withheld from pots, upper leaf ψ w dropped to −1.6 to −1.8 MPa and photosynthetic rates of the same leaves were ≈20 μmol m −2 s −1 . Stem infusion of liquid tissue culture medium during 5‐ or 7.5‐d water‐deficit periods initiated 1 d after silking prevented reproductive failure without rehydrating the plant. Final grain yields of some of the medium‐infused plants approached control yields. Dehydrated plants which received infusion of a similar volume of water or which were not infused experienced nearly complete reproductive failure. Following rehydration, photosynthesis of all plants exposed to low ψ w during anthesis recovered, but only those infused with the medium during low ψ w continued kernel development to maturity. Additional experiments indicated that plant growth regulators were not required for an effective medium. These experiments identify assimilate supply and not low plant ψ w per se as a limiting factor in maize reproductive failure near anthesis and suggest that improvement in drought tolerance may be achieved by changes in the assimilate storage patterns and/or the phenology of maize plants. Additionally, this whole plant system provides an agriculturally relevant model system for studying the cellular and subcellular mechanisms associated with failure of reproductive growth at low ψ w .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Well-watered maize leaves had photosynthesis near 20 μmol m −2 s −1 and water potential of −0.6 MPa.

Outcome
rates of net photosynthesis of upper leavese0
Value
≈20 μmol m −2 s −1e0
Qualifier
well‐watered plantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“rates of net photosynthesis of upper leaves of well‐watered plants were ≈20 μmol m −2 s −1 and the ψ w of these leaves was −0.6 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After withholding water, upper leaf water potential fell to −1.6 to −1.8 MPa.

Treatment
water was withheld from potse0
Outcome
upper leaf ψ we0
Direction
droppede0
Value
−1.6 to −1.8 MPae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 5 d after water was withheld from pots, upper leaf ψ w dropped to −1.6 to −1.8 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1005 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After withholding water, upper leaf photosynthesis remained near 20 μmol m −2 s −1.

Outcome
photosynthetic rates of the same leavese0
Value
≈20 μmol m −2 s −1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic rates of the same leaves were ≈20 μmol m −2 s −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem infusion of culture medium prevented reproductive failure during water deficit.

Treatment
Stem infusion of liquid tissue culture mediume0
Outcome
reproductive failuree0
Direction
preventede0
Qualifier
during 5‐ or 7.5‐d water‐deficit periodse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stem infusion of liquid tissue culture medium during 5‐ or 7.5‐d water‐deficit periods initiated 1 d after silking prevented reproductive failure without rehydrating the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1251 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some medium-infused plants had grain yields approaching controls.

Outcome
Final grain yieldse0
Direction
approachede0
Qualifier
some of the medium‐infused plantse0
Comparator
control yieldse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Final grain yields of some of the medium‐infused plants approached control yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water infusion did not prevent nearly complete reproductive failure under dehydration.

Treatment
infusion of a similar volume of watere0
Outcome
nearly complete reproductive failuree0
Comparator
not infusede0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Dehydrated plants which received infusion of a similar volume of water or which were not infused experienced nearly complete reproductive failure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-infused dehydrated maize had nearly complete reproductive failure.

Outcome
nearly complete reproductive failuree0
Qualifier
not infusede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Dehydrated plants which received infusion of a similar volume of water or which were not infused experienced nearly complete reproductive failure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis recovered after rehydration in all plants exposed to low water potential.

Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
recoverede0
Qualifier
all plants exposed to low ψ w during anthesise0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Following rehydration, photosynthesis of all plants exposed to low ψ w during anthesis recovered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only medium-infused plants continued kernel development to maturity.

Treatment
infused with the mediume0
Outcome
kernel development to maturitye0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“only those infused with the medium during low ψ w continued kernel development to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1675 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulators were unnecessary for an effective medium.

Outcome
plant growth regulators were not required for an effective mediume0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“plant growth regulators were not required for an effective medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1780 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assimilate supply was identified as limiting maize reproduction near anthesis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
maize reproductive failure near anthesise0
Qualifier
assimilate supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“assimilate supply and not low plant ψ w per se as a limiting factor in maize reproductive failure near anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1920 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest changing assimilate storage or phenology to improve drought tolerance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
changes in the assimilate storage patterns and/or the phenology of maize plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improvement in drought tolerance may be achieved by changes in the assimilate storage patterns and/or the phenology of maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1938–2069 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The whole-plant system provides a model for studying reproductive failure at low water potential.

Outcome
model system for studying the cellular and subcellular mechanisms associated with failure of reproductive growth at low ψ we0
Value
whole plant systeme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“this whole plant system provides an agriculturally relevant model system for studying the cellular and subcellular mechanisms associated with failure of reproductive growth at low ψ w”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2085–2268 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 60 positive, 27 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.