Paper · 2014 · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Short communication. Growth and nodulation of cowpea after 5 years of consecutive composted tannery sludge amendment

Ana R. L. Miranda; Luis A. P. L. Nunes; Mara L. J. Oliveira; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tannery industry releases high amounts of tannery sludge which are currently composted and used in agricultural soils. The consecutive amendment of such composted tannery sludge (CTS) may affect soil microrganisms, such as rhizobia. In this study, we evaluated the effects of 5-year repeated CTS amendment on growth, nodulation, and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha) to a sandy soil. Amendment of CTS increased soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), sodium and chromium content. Plant growth, nodulation, N accumulation, and cowpea yield increased up to 10 Mg/ha; however, above this rate, these variables decreased. After 5 years of CTS amendment, the increase in soil chemical properties, particularly EC and Na content, exerted negative effects on the growth, nodulation, and yield of cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Composted tannery sludge amendment increased soil pH and electrical conductivity in the sandy soil used for cowpea.

Treatment
Amendment of CTSe0
Outcome
soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
sandy soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendment of CTS increased soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), sodium and chromium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha) to a sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Composted tannery sludge amendment increased soil sodium and chromium content in the sandy soil used for cowpea.

Treatment
Amendment of CTSe0
Outcome
sodium and chromium contente0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
sandy soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendment of CTS increased soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), sodium and chromium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha) to a sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea plant growth, nodulation and N accumulation increased with CTS amendment up to 10 Mg/ha.

Treatment
CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha)e1
Outcome
Plant growth, nodulation, N accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
up to 10 Mg/hae0
Setting
sandy soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, nodulation, N accumulation, and cowpea yield increased up to 10 Mg/ha; however, above this rate, these variables decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha) to a sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield increased with CTS amendment up to 10 Mg/ha.

Treatment
CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha)e1
Outcome
cowpea yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
up to 10 Mg/hae0
Setting
sandy soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, nodulation, N accumulation, and cowpea yield increased up to 10 Mg/ha; however, above this rate, these variables decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha) to a sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 10 Mg/ha CTS, cowpea plant growth, nodulation and N accumulation decreased.

Treatment
CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha)e1
Outcome
Plant growth, nodulation, N accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
above this ratee0
Setting
sandy soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, nodulation, N accumulation, and cowpea yield increased up to 10 Mg/ha; however, above this rate, these variables decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha) to a sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 10 Mg/ha CTS, cowpea yield decreased.

Treatment
CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha)e1
Outcome
cowpea yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
above this ratee0
Setting
sandy soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, nodulation, N accumulation, and cowpea yield increased up to 10 Mg/ha; however, above this rate, these variables decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“CTS was applied in different amounts (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 Mg/ha) to a sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–453 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 5 years of CTS amendment, the increased soil EC and Na content exerted negative effects on cowpea growth, nodulation and yield.

Outcome
growth, nodulation, and yield of cowpeae0
Qualifier
the increase in soil chemical properties, particularly EC and Na contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase in soil chemical properties, particularly EC and Na content, exerted negative effects on the growth, nodulation, and yield of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–865 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

organic · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.