Paper · 2010 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of high temperature after anthesis on starch granules in grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

P. LIU; W. GUO; Z. JIANG; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
119
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The effect of high temperatures (above 25°C) on starch concentration and the morphology of starch granules in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied. Wheat plants of cultivars Yangmai 9 (weak-gluten) and Yangmai 12 (medium-gluten) were treated with high temperatures for 3 days at different times after anthesis. The results showed that the starch concentration of grains given a heat-shock treatment above 30°C were lower than those developing at normal temperature in both cultivars. High temperature lowered starch concentration due to the decrease of amylopectin. Under the same temperature, the effect of heat shock from 6 to 8 days after anthesis (DAA) was the greatest, whereas from 36 to 38 DAA the effect was the least. The effects of high temperatures after anthesis on starch-pasting properties were similar to those on starch concentration, especially after 35-40°C treatments. The size, shape and structure of starch granules in wheat grains (determined by electron microscopy) after heat shock were visibly different from the control. When given heat shock during development, the starch granules in mature wheat grains were ellipsoid in shape and bound loosely with a protein sheath in Yangmai 9, while they were damaged and compressed with fissures in Yangmai 12, indicating the differences in resistance to high temperature between cultivars. Ratios of large (type-A) and small (type-B) starch granules significantly decreased under heat shock, which limited the potential sink size for dry matter deposition in the grain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat-shock treatment above 30°C lowered starch concentration in wheat grains compared with normal temperature in both cultivars.

Organ / stage
grainse1
Treatment
heat-shock treatment above 30°Ce1
Outcome
starch concentratione1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
normal temperaturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e1

“the starch concentration of grains given a heat-shock treatment above 30°C were lower than those developing at normal temperature in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–501 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature lowered starch concentration in wheat by decreasing amylopectin.

Compound
amylopectine2
Outcome
starch concentratione2
Direction
lowerede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e2

“High temperature lowered starch concentration due to the decrease of amylopectin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock from 6 to 8 days after anthesis had the greatest effect on starch concentration.

Organ / stage
after anthesise3
Treatment
heat shock from 6 to 8 days after anthesis (DAA)e3
Outcome
the effect of heat shocke3
Direction
greateste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the same temperature, the effect of heat shock from 6 to 8 days after anthesis (DAA) was the greatest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock from 36 to 38 DAA had the least effect on starch concentration.

Treatment
from 36 to 38 DAAe4
Outcome
the effecte4
Direction
leaste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas from 36 to 38 DAA the effect was the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperatures after anthesis changed starch-pasting properties in a way similar to starch concentration, especially after 35-40°C treatments.

Treatment
high temperatures after anthesise5
Outcome
starch-pasting propertiese5
Qualifier
similar to those on starch concentratione5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e5

“The effects of high temperatures after anthesis on starch-pasting properties were similar to those on starch concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–868 · show in text ↑
e6

“especially after 35-40°C treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock visibly changed the size, shape and structure of starch granules in wheat grains compared with the control.

Organ / stage
wheat grainse6
Treatment
heat shocke6
Outcome
size, shape and structure of starch granulese6
Direction
visibly differente6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e6

“The size, shape and structure of starch granules in wheat grains (determined by electron microscopy) after heat shock were visibly different from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Yangmai 9, starch granules in heat-shocked mature grains were ellipsoid and loosely bound to a protein sheath.

Material
Yangmai 9e7
Organ / stage
mature wheat grainse7
Treatment
heat shocke7
Outcome
starch granulese7
Qualifier
ellipsoid in shape and bound loosely with a protein sheathe7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e7

“When given heat shock during development, the starch granules in mature wheat grains were ellipsoid in shape and bound loosely with a protein sheath in Yangmai 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Yangmai 12, starch granules in heat-shocked mature grains were damaged and compressed with fissures.

Material
Yangmai 12e2
Organ / stage
mature wheat grainse7
Treatment
heat shocke7
Outcome
starch granulese7
Qualifier
damaged and compressed with fissurese2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e7

“When given heat shock during development, the starch granules in mature wheat grains were ellipsoid in shape and bound loosely with a protein sheath in Yangmai 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1227 · show in text ↑
e2

“while they were damaged and compressed with fissures in Yangmai 12, indicating the differences in resistance to high temperature between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1375 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yangmai 9 and Yangmai 12 differ in resistance to high temperature.

Outcome
the differences in resistance to high temperature between cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e1

“while they were damaged and compressed with fissures in Yangmai 12, indicating the differences in resistance to high temperature between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock significantly decreased the ratios of large and small starch granules in wheat grains.

Treatment
heat shocke1
Outcome
Ratios of large (type-A) and small (type-B) starch granulese1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ratios of large (type-A) and small (type-B) starch granules significantly decreased under heat shock, which limited the potential sink size for dry matter deposition in the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1555 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decreased starch granule ratios limited the potential sink size for dry matter deposition in wheat grains.

Outcome
potential sink size for dry matter depositione1
Qualifier
Ratios of large (type-A) and small (type-B) starch granulese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–165 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ratios of large (type-A) and small (type-B) starch granules significantly decreased under heat shock, which limited the potential sink size for dry matter deposition in the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1555 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

42 papers: 7 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.