Paper · 2011 · Journal of Cereal Research

Agronomic bio-fortification of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through iron and zinc enriched organics

R. S. Yadav; A. M. Patel; I. N. Dodia; et al.

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The short-term agricultural tools like agronomic bio-fortification of available nutrient resources as a complementary approach was initiated by applying iron and zinc as such as well as enriched with organics (FYM & Vermicompost) with two levels of recommended dose of nitrogen and phosphorus (RDNP). The RDNP with organics without iron and zinc (i.e. T1) was treated as control. The soil under study was sandy loam having low organic carbon and medium in fertility with neutral soil reaction. A significant impact of iron & zinc enriched organics were found on soil properties as well as wheat quality and production. However, both the organic sources were found at par towards all the parameters under study. The application effect of Fe-Zn enriched organics with RDNP were increased both grain as well as biomass yield of the wheat by 2.3 to 6.6% as compared to direct and by 5.6 to 10.3% as compared to no application of the micronutrients. Similarly, an appreciable improvement in SOC (28%), available nitrogen (5%) and available phosphorus (22%) was observed which are equivalent or better than control. Although, the application effect of Fe-Zn enriched organics with RDNP didn’t show any effect on nitrogen and phosphorus uptake by wheat. Therefore, these differences seem to be due to application of organics and RDNP. In contrary, the availability of Fe (5.9 to 18.4 %) & Zn (24.3 to 48.5 %) as well as their uptake (12.9 to 24.1 % for Fe and 13.4 to 28.8 % for Zn) by wheat were appreciably increased by application of Fe-Zn enriched organic as compared to direct and no application of these micronutrients. Further, it is interesting that availability (10 to 37%) as well as uptake (17 to 32%) of these micronutrients was considerably higher under 50% RDNP as compared to 100% RDNP possibly due to antagonistic effect of phosphorus. Hence, this approach would be able to conquer the micronutrient deficiency in the food and human.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic sources performed similarly.

Outcome
all the parameters under studye0
Direction
at pare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the organic sources were found at par towards all the parameters under study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched organics increased wheat yield.

Treatment
Fe-Zn enriched organics with RDNPe0
Outcome
grain as well as biomass yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.3 to 6.6%e0
Comparator
directe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application effect of Fe-Zn enriched organics with RDNP were increased both grain as well as biomass yield of the wheat by 2.3 to 6.6% as compared to direct and by 5.6 to 10.3% as compared to no application of the micronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched organics increased wheat yield.

Treatment
Fe-Zn enriched organics with RDNPe0
Outcome
grain as well as biomass yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.6 to 10.3%e0
Comparator
no application of the micronutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application effect of Fe-Zn enriched organics with RDNP were increased both grain as well as biomass yield of the wheat by 2.3 to 6.6% as compared to direct and by 5.6 to 10.3% as compared to no application of the micronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–944 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOC improved.

Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
28%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an appreciable improvement in SOC (28%), available nitrogen (5%) and available phosphorus (22%) was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

available nitrogen improved.

Outcome
available nitrogene0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an appreciable improvement in SOC (28%), available nitrogen (5%) and available phosphorus (22%) was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

available phosphorus improved.

Outcome
available phosphoruse0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
22%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an appreciable improvement in SOC (28%), available nitrogen (5%) and available phosphorus (22%) was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched organics showed no effect on nitrogen and phosphorus uptake.

Treatment
Fe-Zn enriched organics with RDNPe0
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
didn’t show any effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application effect of Fe-Zn enriched organics with RDNP didn’t show any effect on nitrogen and phosphorus uptake by wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

availability of Fe increased with enriched organics.

Treatment
Fe-Zn enriched organice0
Outcome
availability of Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.9 to 18.4 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“availability of Fe (5.9 to 18.4 %) & Zn (24.3 to 48.5 %) as well as their uptake (12.9 to 24.1 % for Fe and 13.4 to 28.8 % for Zn) by wheat were appreciably increased by application of Fe-Zn enriched organic as compared to direct and no application of these micronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn increased with enriched organics.

Treatment
Fe-Zn enriched organice0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.3 to 48.5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“availability of Fe (5.9 to 18.4 %) & Zn (24.3 to 48.5 %) as well as their uptake (12.9 to 24.1 % for Fe and 13.4 to 28.8 % for Zn) by wheat were appreciably increased by application of Fe-Zn enriched organic as compared to direct and no application of these micronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

uptake increased with enriched organics.

Treatment
Fe-Zn enriched organice0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.9 to 24.1 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“availability of Fe (5.9 to 18.4 %) & Zn (24.3 to 48.5 %) as well as their uptake (12.9 to 24.1 % for Fe and 13.4 to 28.8 % for Zn) by wheat were appreciably increased by application of Fe-Zn enriched organic as compared to direct and no application of these micronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

uptake increased with enriched organics.

Treatment
Fe-Zn enriched organice0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.4 to 28.8 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“availability of Fe (5.9 to 18.4 %) & Zn (24.3 to 48.5 %) as well as their uptake (12.9 to 24.1 % for Fe and 13.4 to 28.8 % for Zn) by wheat were appreciably increased by application of Fe-Zn enriched organic as compared to direct and no application of these micronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

availability was higher under 50% RDNP.

Treatment
50% RDNPe0
Outcome
availabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
10 to 37%e0
Comparator
100% RDNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“availability (10 to 37%) as well as uptake (17 to 32%) of these micronutrients was considerably higher under 50% RDNP as compared to 100% RDNP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

uptake was higher under 50% RDNP.

Treatment
50% RDNPe0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
17 to 32%e0
Comparator
100% RDNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“availability (10 to 37%) as well as uptake (17 to 32%) of these micronutrients was considerably higher under 50% RDNP as compared to 100% RDNP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.