Paper · 2006 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Hybrid and N Fertilization Affect Corn Silage Yield and Quality

C. C. Sheaffer; J. L. Halgerson; H. G. Jung

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
51
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract We determined the effect of N fertilization on dry matter (DM) yield, predicted milk yield, and forage quality of fresh (green chopped) and ensiled forage of two brown midrib (BMR) hybrids, a leafy hybrid, and a conventional silage hybrid. Increasing N rates from 0 to 200 kg ha −1 increased corn grain, stover and whole plant DM yield and milk yield. The forage yield and quality response to N was similar for all hybrids. Nitrogen fertilization increased forage crude protein (CP) concentration but had little effect on other forage quality components. BMR hybrids, F377 and F657, had the lowest grain, stover and whole plant yield but had the highest digestibility and predicted milk yield Mg −1 of forage. Predicted milk yield ha −1 was similar for the BMR, leafy and conventional hybrids. Ensiling reduced starch concentration compared with green chopped forage, but effects on other forage quality variables were less consistent. Hybrid and N fertilization affects were similar for green chopped and ensiled corn forage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rates increased corn grain, stover and whole-plant dry matter yield.

Treatment
N ratese1
Outcome
corn grain, stover and whole plant DM yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased corn grain, stover and whole plant DM yield and milk yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rates increased predicted milk yield.

Treatment
N ratese1
Outcome
milk yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased corn grain, stover and whole plant DM yield and milk yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased forage crude protein concentration.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione2
Outcome
forage crude protein (CP) concentratione2
Direction
increasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Nitrogen fertilization increased forage crude protein (CP) concentration but had little effect on other forage quality components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization had little effect on other forage quality components.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione2
Outcome
other forage quality componentse2
Direction
little effecte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Nitrogen fertilization increased forage crude protein (CP) concentration but had little effect on other forage quality components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BMR hybrids F377 and F657 had the lowest grain, stover and whole-plant yield.

Material
F377 and F657e3
Outcome
grain, stover and whole plant yielde3
Direction
loweste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“BMR hybrids, F377 and F657, had the lowest grain, stover and whole plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BMR hybrids F377 and F657 had the highest forage digestibility.

Material
F377 and F657e4
Outcome
digestibilitye4
Direction
higheste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“BMR hybrids, F377 and F657, had the lowest grain, stover and whole plant yield but had the highest digestibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted milk yield per hectare was similar for the BMR, leafy and conventional hybrids.

Outcome
milk yielde0
Direction
was similare6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased corn grain, stover and whole plant DM yield and milk yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–359 · show in text ↑
e6

“was similar for the BMR, leafy and conventional hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ensiling reduced starch concentration compared with green chopped forage.

Treatment
Ensilinge7
Outcome
starch concentratione7
Direction
reducede7
Comparator
green chopped foragee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Ensiling reduced starch concentration compared with green chopped forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid and N fertilization effects were similar for green chopped and ensiled forage.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Hybrid and N fertilization affectse0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid and N fertilization affects were similar for green chopped and ensiled corn forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The forage yield and quality response to N was similar for all hybrids.

Outcome
forage yield and quality response to Ne0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The forage yield and quality response to N was similar for all hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ensiling had less consistent effects on other forage quality variables.

Outcome
effects on other forage quality variablese0
Direction
less consistente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects on other forage quality variables were less consistent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BMR hybrids had the highest predicted milk yield.

Outcome
predicted milk yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but had the highest digestibility and predicted milk yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Yield and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.