Paper · 2012 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Biological control of Meloidogyne incognita by Trichoderma harzianum and Serratia marcescens and their related enzymatic changes in tomato roots

M M Abd Elgawad Mahfouz; S A Kabeil Sanaa

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biological control against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita was proven to occur in tomato, Solanum lycopersicom, soil-drenched with different isolates ofTrichoderma harzianum and a commercial suspension of Serratia marcescens(Nemaless). The potential of such biocontrol agents to trigger plant defense response was discussed. Nematode reproduction in the presence of such possibly induced systemic resistance (ISR) elicitors was compared with that occurring on untreated plants and treated plants with the carbofuran nematicide. Dosages used were for carbofuran (1 mg ai/kg soil) and for S. marcescens (1 × 109 bacterium cells/ml water) 2 ml suspension/kg soil; three different T. harzianum isolates (f1, f3 and f8) were separately added at 50 × 108 CFU/kg soil. The possible ISR elicitors were tested on two tomato cultivars (Super Strain B and Alisa), which were inoculated with active juveniles (J2) of M. incognita, and plants were kept in a glasshouse. Indices of plant fitness (PFs) resulting from each treatment, which took into account various growth parameters were also determined. Carbofuran followed by S. marcescens and T. harzianum significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) nematode development and reproduction when compared with the untreated controls. PF of cv. Alisa was higher than that of Super Strain B, and M. incognita reproduced better on the latter cultivar in all treatments. Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and β-1,3-glucanase (GLUC) activities were detected in the roots of inoculated and uninoculated control tomato plants. Similar tests were carried out on inoculated plants treated with such ISR elicitors to search for possible enzyme activity changes as a result of resistance induction. Nematode infection did not cause any significant changes in GLUC activity, whilst PPO activity was enhanced in inoculated with respect to uninoculated roots. Treatments with ISR elicitors and carbofuran did not significantly change GLUC activity in both inoculated plants and uninoculated controls. While in the presence of the ISR elicitors, generally, PPO activity did not increase as a result of nematode infestation. Key words: Enzymatic induction, root-knot nematode, nematode management,Serratia marcescens, Trichoderma harzianum, biological control, carbofuran, nematicide, polyphenol oxidase, β-1,3-glucanase, Solanum lycopersicum

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran significantly decreased nematode development and reproduction versus untreated controls.

Treatment
Carbofurane0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Outcome
nematode development and reproductione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran followed by S. marcescens and T. harzianum significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) nematode development and reproduction when compared with the untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S. marcescens significantly decreased nematode development and reproduction versus untreated controls.

Treatment
S. marcescense0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Second interactor
S. marcescensSerratia marcescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode development and reproductione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia marcescens
Serratia marcescens · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran followed by S. marcescens and T. harzianum significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) nematode development and reproduction when compared with the untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum significantly decreased nematode development and reproduction versus untreated controls.

Treatment
T. harzianume0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode development and reproductione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran followed by S. marcescens and T. harzianum significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.05) nematode development and reproduction when compared with the untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alisa had higher plant fitness than Super Strain B.

Material
cv. Alisae0
Outcome
PFe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Super Strain Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PF of cv. Alisa was higher than that of Super Strain B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita reproduced better on Super Strain B than Alisa under all treatments.

Material
Super Strain Be0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
M. incognita reproducede0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
in all treatmentse0
Comparator
cv. Alisae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PF of cv. Alisa was higher than that of Super Strain B, and M. incognita reproduced better on the latter cultivar in all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPO and GLUC activities were detected in control tomato roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and β-1,3-glucanase (GLUC) activities were detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and β-1,3-glucanase (GLUC) activities were detected in the roots of inoculated and uninoculated control tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode infection did not significantly change GLUC activity.

Treatment
Nematode infectione0
Interactor
NematodeNematodae0pest
Outcome
GLUC activitye0
Direction
did not cause any significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode infection did not cause any significant changes in GLUC activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation enhanced PPO activity in tomato roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
PPO activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
uninoculated rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PPO activity was enhanced in inoculated with respect to uninoculated roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1876 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ISR elicitors did not significantly change GLUC activity in inoculated or uninoculated tomato.

Treatment
ISR elicitorse0
Outcome
GLUC activitye0
Direction
did not significantly changee0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with ISR elicitors and carbofuran did not significantly change GLUC activity in both inoculated plants and uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2018 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran did not significantly change GLUC activity in inoculated or uninoculated tomato.

Treatment
carbofurane0
Outcome
GLUC activitye0
Direction
did not significantly changee0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with ISR elicitors and carbofuran did not significantly change GLUC activity in both inoculated plants and uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2018 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With ISR elicitors, nematode infestation generally did not increase PPO activity.

Treatment
ISR elicitorse0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Outcome
PPO activitye0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the presence of the ISR elicitors, generally, PPO activity did not increase as a result of nematode infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2025–2140 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 · show in text ↑

Serratia marcescens · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carbofuran · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

infection · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

resistance inducer · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.