Paper · 1965 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Varietal Differences in the Kinetics of Iron Uptake by Excised Rice Roots

S. C. SHIM; P. B. VOSE

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Iron uptake by excised rice roots can be described in kinetic terms of active absorption and the formation of ion-carrier complexes. Conventional interpretation indicates two carriers, one of which is responsible for iron absorption at low concentrations, with the second primarily functioning at high iron levels. The maximum absorption of both carriers vanes greatly between varieties, the variety Pebifun having much greater absorptive capacity than either Siam-29 or Paldal. Varietal differences in uptake capacity primarily depend on total carrier concentration, 0.93,0.40, and 0.31 μ moles per g roots of Pebifun, Siam-29, and Paldal respectively. Although the kinetic treatment suggests two carriers, the chromatographic evidence indicates the presence of the iron primarily in one major initial complex, with suggestions of accumulation rather than turnover. An alternative to the carrier hypothesis is therefore put forward which regards the accumulation of iron as binding initially on to one or several closely related substances, followed by incorporation into secondary products when a critical level of the initial product is exceeded. Manganese was found to competitively inhibit iron uptake by rice roots. Inhibition was more severe in Siam-29 than in Paldal and can be explained on the basis of carrier concentration and competition for the same carrier site. Copper was found not to be competitive for the iron absorption sites. The effect of copper was not significant with the low levels of iron but only with the 5 × 10−4 M Fe level. The effect varied between varieties, in Pebifun both 5 × 10−5 and 5 × 10−6 M Cu inhibited iron uptake compared with the control. In the case of Siam-29 both copper levels accelerated iron uptake, 5 × 10−5 M Cu giving the greatest uptake. With 5 × 10−5 M Cu Pebifun took up much less iron than Siam-29. The mecharosm of copper inhibition/stimulation is highly speculative.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice root iron uptake was described by active absorption and ion-carrier complex formation.

Organ / stage
excised rice rootse0
Outcome
Iron uptakee0
Qualifier
active absorption and the formation of ion-carrier complexese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron uptake by excised rice roots can be described in kinetic terms of active absorption and the formation of ion-carrier complexes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetic interpretation indicated one carrier for low iron concentrations and another mainly for high levels.

Outcome
iron absorptione0
Qualifier
two carrierse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional interpretation indicates two carriers, one of which is responsible for iron absorption at low concentrations, with the second primarily functioning at high iron levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pebifun had greater maximum iron absorptive capacity than Siam-29 or Paldal.

Material
Pebifune0
Outcome
absorptive capacitye0
Direction
much greatere0
Comparator
Siam-29 or Paldale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variety Pebifun having much greater absorptive capacity than either Siam-29 or Paldal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pebifun total carrier concentration was 0.93 μ moles per g roots.

Material
Pebifune0
Outcome
total carrier concentratione0
Value
0.93e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total carrier concentration, 0.93,0.40, and 0.31 μ moles per g roots of Pebifun, Siam-29, and Paldal respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siam-29 total carrier concentration was 0.40 μ moles per g roots.

Material
Siam-29e0
Outcome
total carrier concentratione0
Value
0.40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total carrier concentration, 0.93,0.40, and 0.31 μ moles per g roots of Pebifun, Siam-29, and Paldal respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paldal total carrier concentration was 0.31 μ moles per g roots.

Material
Paldale0
Outcome
total carrier concentratione0
Value
0.31 μ moles per g rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total carrier concentration, 0.93,0.40, and 0.31 μ moles per g roots of Pebifun, Siam-29, and Paldal respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromatography indicated iron primarily in one major initial complex, suggesting accumulation rather than turnover.

Outcome
iron primarily in one major initial complexe0
Qualifier
suggestions of accumulation rather than turnovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chromatographic evidence indicates the presence of the iron primarily in one major initial complex, with suggestions of accumulation rather than turnover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed initial iron binding followed by incorporation into secondary products above a critical level.

Outcome
incorporation into secondary productse0
Qualifier
binding initially on to one or several closely related substancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“binding initially on to one or several closely related substances, followed by incorporation into secondary products when a critical level of the initial product is exceeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese competitively inhibited rice root iron uptake.

Treatment
Manganesee0
Outcome
iron uptakee0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manganese was found to competitively inhibit iron uptake by rice roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese inhibition was more severe in Siam-29 than Paldal.

Material
Siam-29e0
Treatment
Manganesee1
Outcome
Inhibitione0
Direction
more severee0
Comparator
Paldale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibition was more severe in Siam-29 than in Paldal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1274 · show in text ↑
e1

“Manganese was found to competitively inhibit iron uptake by rice roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1220 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper was not competitive for iron absorption sites.

Treatment
Coppere0
Outcome
not to be competitive for the iron absorption sitese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Copper was found not to be competitive for the iron absorption sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At low iron levels, the copper effect was not significant.

Treatment
coppere0
Outcome
effect of coppere0
Qualifier
low levels of irone0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of copper was not significant with the low levels of iron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5 × 10−4 M Fe, copper had an effect.

Treatment
coppere1
Outcome
effect of coppere1
Qualifier
5 × 10−4 M Fee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but only with the 5 × 10−4 M Fe level. The effect varied between varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1590 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of copper was not significant with the low levels of iron but only with the 5 × 10−4 M Fe level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Pebifun, both tested copper levels inhibited iron uptake versus control.

Material
Pebifune0
Treatment
5 × 10−5 and 5 × 10−6 M Cue0
Outcome
iron uptakee0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Pebifun both 5 × 10−5 and 5 × 10−6 M Cu inhibited iron uptake compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Siam-29, both tested copper levels accelerated iron uptake, with greatest uptake at 5 × 10−5 M Cu.

Material
Siam-29e0
Treatment
copper levelse0
Outcome
iron uptakee0
Direction
acceleratede0
Qualifier
5 × 10−5 M Cu giving the greatest uptakee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of Siam-29 both copper levels accelerated iron uptake, 5 × 10−5 M Cu giving the greatest uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5 × 10−5 M Cu, Pebifun took up less iron than Siam-29.

Material
Pebifune0
Treatment
5 × 10−5 M Cue0
Outcome
irone0
Direction
much lesse0
Comparator
Siam-29e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 5 × 10−5 M Cu Pebifun took up much less iron than Siam-29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

copper atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 23 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.