Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Leaf Photosynthetic Metabolism and N2 Fixation at the Flowering Stage in Three Genotypes of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

Marciel Teixeira Oliveira; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; Ederson Akio Kido; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in cultivars of cowpea is not yet understood. The hypothesis proposed by this study is that lack of basic technology, including sufficient mineral nutrition, combined with periods of water shortage during the crop cycle leads to insufficient photosynthetic metabolism in the flowering stage in nodulated plants. Two experiments were conducted in northeastern Brazil, one under field conditions and another in a greenhouse at near optimal conditions. Two of the principal cultivars selected for northeastern (Mulato and Gurguéia) and one for northern Brazil (Milênio) were evaluated regarding physiological, biochemical and biometric variables between the late vegetative and early reproductive stages under mineral nutrition and BNF treatments. Gas exchanges, chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf contents of soluble sugars, amino acids, proteins and chlorophyll of inoculated plants were similar to plants fertilized with mineral nitrogen, in the three cultivars in both experiments, with emphasis on Gurguéia. Leaf nitrogen concentrations and the number and dry weight of nodules were higher in Mulato and Gurguéia compared to Milênio. Milênio and Gurguéia under BNF showed higher total dry weight compared to controls; however, the number of pods per plant was higher in inoculated plants compared to controls. In conclusion, based on these results under non-stressful conditions, cultivars selected for the northeastern region inoculated with an effective rhizobia strain and receiving a mild dose of mineral nitrogen can ensure development similar to that verified in plants fertilized only with correct nitrogen fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cowpea and mineral-nitrogen-fertilized cowpea had similar gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in all three cultivars and both experiments.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
Gas exchanges, chlorophyll fluorescencee0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
three cultivars in both experimentse0
Comparator
plants fertilized with mineral nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gas exchanges, chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf contents of soluble sugars, amino acids, proteins and chlorophyll of inoculated plants were similar to plants fertilized with mineral nitrogen, in the three cultivars in both experiments, with emphasis on Gurguéia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cowpea and mineral-nitrogen-fertilized cowpea had similar leaf soluble sugars, amino acids and proteins in all three cultivars and both experiments.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
leaf contents of soluble sugars, amino acids, proteinse0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
three cultivars in both experimentse0
Comparator
plants fertilized with mineral nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gas exchanges, chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf contents of soluble sugars, amino acids, proteins and chlorophyll of inoculated plants were similar to plants fertilized with mineral nitrogen, in the three cultivars in both experiments, with emphasis on Gurguéia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cowpea and mineral-nitrogen-fertilized cowpea had similar leaf chlorophyll content.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
plants fertilized with mineral nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gas exchanges, chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf contents of soluble sugars, amino acids, proteins and chlorophyll of inoculated plants were similar to plants fertilized with mineral nitrogen, in the three cultivars in both experiments, with emphasis on Gurguéia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulato had higher leaf nitrogen concentration than Milênio.

Material
Mulatoe0
Outcome
Leaf nitrogen concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Milênioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen concentrations and the number and dry weight of nodules were higher in Mulato and Gurguéia compared to Milênio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gurguéia had higher leaf nitrogen concentration than Milênio.

Material
Gurguéiae0
Outcome
Leaf nitrogen concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Milênioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen concentrations and the number and dry weight of nodules were higher in Mulato and Gurguéia compared to Milênio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulato had more nodules and greater nodule dry weight than Milênio.

Material
Mulatoe0
Outcome
number and dry weight of nodulese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Milênioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen concentrations and the number and dry weight of nodules were higher in Mulato and Gurguéia compared to Milênio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gurguéia had more nodules and greater nodule dry weight than Milênio.

Material
Gurguéiae0
Outcome
number and dry weight of nodulese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Milênioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen concentrations and the number and dry weight of nodules were higher in Mulato and Gurguéia compared to Milênio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milênio under biological nitrogen fixation had higher total dry weight than controls.

Material
Milênioe0
Treatment
BNFe0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Milênio and Gurguéia under BNF showed higher total dry weight compared to controls; however, the number of pods per plant was higher in inoculated plants compared to controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gurguéia under biological nitrogen fixation had higher total dry weight than controls.

Material
Gurguéiae0
Treatment
BNFe0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Milênio and Gurguéia under BNF showed higher total dry weight compared to controls; however, the number of pods per plant was higher in inoculated plants compared to controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants had more pods per plant than controls.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of pods per plant was higher in inoculated plants compared to controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that northeastern cultivars given effective rhizobia and mild mineral nitrogen can develop similarly to correctly nitrogen-fertilized plants under nonstressful conditions.

Treatment
inoculated with an effective rhizobia strain and receiving a mild dose of mineral nitrogene0
Outcome
development similar to that verified in plants fertilized only with correct nitrogen fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars selected for the northeastern region inoculated with an effective rhizobia strain and receiving a mild dose of mineral nitrogen can ensure development similar to that verified in plants fertilized only with correct nitrogen fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 39 positive, 6 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.