Paper · 2013 · Journal of Central European Agriculture

Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Some Physiological and Agronomical Traits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Irrigated Condition

Ali Namvar; Raouf SHARIFI; Teymur KHANDAN; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
32
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

The effects of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilization on some physiological and agronomical traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. ILC 482, investigated at the Experimental Farm of the Agriculture Faculty, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili. The trial was laid out in spilt plot design based on randomized complete block with four replications. Experimental factors were mineral nitrogen fertilizer at four levels (0, 50, 75 and 100 kg urea/ha) in the main plots, and two levels of inoculation with Rhizobium bacteria (with and without inoculation) as sub plots. N application and Rh. inoculation showed positive effects on physiological and agronomical traits of chickpea. The highest value of leaf RWC recorded in 50 kg urea/ha that was statistically in par with 75 kg urea/ha application while, usage of 75 kg urea/ha showed the maximum stem RWC. The maximum CMS obtained form application of 75 kg urea/ha. Chlorophyll content, leaf area index and grains protein content showed their maximum values in the highest level of nitrogen usage (100 kg urea/ha). Moreover, inoculated plants had the highest magnitudes of all physiological traits. In the case of agronomical traits, the highest values of plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, number of pods per plant, number of grains per plant, grain and biological yield were obtained from the highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (100 kg urea/ha) and Rh. inoculation. Application of 75 kg urea/ha was statistically in par with 100 kg urea/ha in all of these traits. The results pointed out that some N fertilization (i.e. between 50 and 75 kg urea/ha) as starter can be beneficial to improve growth, development, physiological traits and total yield of inoculated chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg urea/ha produced the highest leaf relative water content, statistically comparable to 75 kg urea/ha.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinume1
Treatment
50 kg urea/hae0
Outcome
leaf RWCe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
75 kg urea/ha applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value of leaf RWC recorded in 50 kg urea/ha that was statistically in par with 75 kg urea/ha application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg urea/ha gave maximum stem relative water content.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinume1
Treatment
75 kg urea/hae0
Outcome
stem RWCe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“usage of 75 kg urea/ha showed the maximum stem RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg urea/ha gave maximum CMS.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinume1
Treatment
application of 75 kg urea/hae0
Outcome
CMSe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum CMS obtained form application of 75 kg urea/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–917 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 kg urea/ha maximized chlorophyll content, leaf area index and grain protein content.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinume1
Treatment
100 kg urea/hae0
Outcome
Chlorophyll content, leaf area index and grains protein contente0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content, leaf area index and grains protein content showed their maximum values in the highest level of nitrogen usage (100 kg urea/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium-inoculated plants had the highest magnitudes of physiological traits.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinume2
Treatment
inoculation with Rhizobium bacteriae1
Interactor
Rhizobium bacteriae1symbiont
Outcome
all physiological traitse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
without inoculatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated plants had the highest magnitudes of all physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1150 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with Rhizobium bacteria (with and without inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 kg urea/ha with Rhizobium inoculation maximized plant height and branch numbers.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinume2
Treatment
100 kg urea/hae0
Interactor
Rhizobium bacteriae1symbiont
Outcome
plant height, number of primary and secondary branchese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values of plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, number of pods per plant, number of grains per plant, grain and biological yield were obtained from the highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (100 kg urea/ha) and Rh. inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1442 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with Rhizobium bacteria (with and without inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 kg urea/ha with Rhizobium inoculation maximized pod and grain numbers.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinume2
Treatment
100 kg urea/hae0
Interactor
Rhizobium bacteriae1symbiont
Outcome
number of pods per plant, number of grains per plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values of plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, number of pods per plant, number of grains per plant, grain and biological yield were obtained from the highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (100 kg urea/ha) and Rh. inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1442 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with Rhizobium bacteria (with and without inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 kg urea/ha with Rhizobium inoculation maximized grain and biological yield.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinume2
Treatment
100 kg urea/hae0
Interactor
Rhizobium bacteriae1symbiont
Outcome
grain and biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values of plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, number of pods per plant, number of grains per plant, grain and biological yield were obtained from the highest level of nitrogen fertilizer (100 kg urea/ha) and Rh. inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1442 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with Rhizobium bacteria (with and without inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg urea/ha was statistically comparable to 100 kg urea/ha on agronomic traits.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinume2
Treatment
75 kg urea/hae0
Outcome
agronomical traitse1
Direction
in pare0
Comparator
100 kg urea/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 75 kg urea/ha was statistically in par with 100 kg urea/ha in all of these traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1540 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the case of agronomical traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1185 · show in text ↑
e2

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–137 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 50–75 kg urea/ha starter N for inoculated chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
between 50 and 75 kg urea/hae0
Outcome
some N fertilization (i.e. between 50 and 75 kg urea/ha) as startere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some N fertilization (i.e. between 50 and 75 kg urea/ha) as starter can be beneficial to improve growth, development, physiological traits and total yield of inoculated chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1748 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.