Paper · 1970 · Bangladesh Journal of Microbiology

Influence of Rhizobium Inoculant and Mineral Nitrogen on Some Chickpea Varieties

ARM Solaiman; Delowar Hossain; M Golam Rabbani

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the research farm of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Gazipur, Bangladesh to study the response of five chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) varieties to Rhizobium inoculant and mineral nitrogen on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, dry matter production, nitrogen (N) uptake, yield and quality of the crop. Among the treatments, Rhizobium inoculant in combination with Barichola-5 in absence of nitrogen performed best in recording number and dry weight of nodules and nitrogenase activity of chickpea. Barichola-2 in presence of 100 kg N/ha performed best in recording dry weight of shoot and root, number of branches, chlorophyll a and b, nitrogen content in shoot, nitrogen uptake by shoot, protein content in seed, number of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant, 1000-seed weight and stover and seed yields. The performances of Barichola-5 and Barichola-3 in presence of Rhizobium inoculant and in the absence of mineral nitrogen were comparable to Barichola-2 in most of the parameters of the crop studied. Keywords: Rhizobium inoculant, Nitrogen, ChickpeaDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v24i2.1261 Bangladesh J Microbiol, Volume 24, Number 2, December 2007, pp 146-150 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v24i2.1260

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the treatments, Rhizobium inoculant with Barichola-5 and no nitrogen gave the best number and dry weight of nodules and nitrogenase activity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Barichola-5e1
Organ / stage
nodulese1
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculante1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
number and dry weight of nodulese1
Direction
performed beste1
Qualifier
nitrogenase activitye1
Comparator
the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of five chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) varieties to Rhizobium inoculant and mineral nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–257 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, Rhizobium inoculant in combination with Barichola-5 in absence of nitrogen performed best in recording number and dry weight of nodules and nitrogenase activity of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barichola-2 with 100 kg N/ha performed best for shoot and root dry weight and number of branches.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Barichola-2e2
Treatment
100 kg N/hae2
Outcome
dry weight of shoot and root, number of branchese2
Direction
performed beste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of five chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) varieties to Rhizobium inoculant and mineral nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–257 · show in text ↑
e2

“Barichola-2 in presence of 100 kg N/ha performed best in recording dry weight of shoot and root, number of branches, chlorophyll a and b, nitrogen content in shoot, nitrogen uptake by shoot, protein content in seed, number of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant, 1000-seed weight and stover and seed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barichola-2 with 100 kg N/ha performed best for chlorophyll a and b, shoot nitrogen content and shoot nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Barichola-2e2
Treatment
100 kg N/hae2
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b, nitrogen content in shoot, nitrogen uptake by shoote2
Direction
performed beste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of five chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) varieties to Rhizobium inoculant and mineral nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–257 · show in text ↑
e2

“Barichola-2 in presence of 100 kg N/ha performed best in recording dry weight of shoot and root, number of branches, chlorophyll a and b, nitrogen content in shoot, nitrogen uptake by shoot, protein content in seed, number of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant, 1000-seed weight and stover and seed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barichola-2 with 100 kg N/ha performed best for protein content in seed, seeds and pods per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Barichola-2e2
Treatment
100 kg N/hae2
Outcome
protein content in seed, number of seeds per plant, number of pods per plante2
Direction
performed beste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of five chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) varieties to Rhizobium inoculant and mineral nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–257 · show in text ↑
e2

“Barichola-2 in presence of 100 kg N/ha performed best in recording dry weight of shoot and root, number of branches, chlorophyll a and b, nitrogen content in shoot, nitrogen uptake by shoot, protein content in seed, number of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant, 1000-seed weight and stover and seed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barichola-2 with 100 kg N/ha performed best for 1000-seed weight, stover yield and seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Barichola-2e2
Treatment
100 kg N/hae2
Outcome
1000-seed weight and stover and seed yieldse2
Direction
performed beste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of five chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) varieties to Rhizobium inoculant and mineral nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–257 · show in text ↑
e2

“Barichola-2 in presence of 100 kg N/ha performed best in recording dry weight of shoot and root, number of branches, chlorophyll a and b, nitrogen content in shoot, nitrogen uptake by shoot, protein content in seed, number of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant, 1000-seed weight and stover and seed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barichola-5 and Barichola-3 with Rhizobium inoculant and no mineral nitrogen were comparable to Barichola-2 in most parameters.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Barichola-5 and Barichola-3e3
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculante3
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
most of the parameterse3
Direction
comparablee3
Comparator
Barichola-2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of five chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) varieties to Rhizobium inoculant and mineral nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–257 · show in text ↑
e3

“The performances of Barichola-5 and Barichola-3 in presence of Rhizobium inoculant and in the absence of mineral nitrogen were comparable to Barichola-2 in most of the parameters of the crop studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1075 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.