Paper · 2005

Fungitoxic and Phytotoxic Effect of Vernonia amygdalina (L), Bryophyllum pinnantus Kurz Ocimum gratissimum (Closium) L. and Eucalyptna globules (Caliptos) Labill Water Extracts on Cowpea and Cowpea Seedling Pathogens in Ago-Iwoye, South Western Nigeria

D. A. Alabi; I. A. Oyero; N. A. Amusa

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study to evaluate the fungitoxic and phytotoxic effects of extracts of V. amaygdalina, B. pinnatus, O. gratissimum and E. globules on the fungal pathogens inducing wilting on cowpea grown in Ago-Iwoye, South Western Nigeria. The extracts of all the botanicals used reduced Disease Infection Rate (DIR) in treated plants. Sclerotium rolfsii sacc induced wilting of between 4 and 12% on cowpea seedlings treated with plant extract under field conditions while about 39.6% incidence of cowpea seedlings wilting was observed under control experiment on the same experimental plot. The extracts increased significantly the plant height, shelf life, relative water content and chlorophyll contents of the cowpea seedlings during both the wet and dry season. On the other hand, the extracts significantly (p = 0.05) reduced transpiration rate and stomata aperture of treated plant in both seasons. Furthermore, application of these extracts on the cowpea plants significantly enhanced the Leaf Area Index (LAI) number of branches and ponds per plant, total dry matter per plant, weight per pod, 100 grains weight and grain yield in both season when compared with the values obtained from control plants. The extracts also inhibited the release of current photosynthethates from treated plants thus maintaining the water status of plant and also making photosynthethates which can be oxidized to release energy needed for growth available to treated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botanical extracts reduced disease infection rate in cowpea.

Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
Disease Infection Rate (DIR)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extracts of all the botanicals used reduced Disease Infection Rate (DIR) in treated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–322 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract-treated cowpea seedlings had 4–12% Sclerotium-induced wilt versus about 39.6% in controls.

Treatment
plant extracte0
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsii saccAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Outcome
Sclerotium rolfsii sacc induced wiltinge0
Direction
betweene0
Value
between 4 and 12%e0
Qualifier
about 39.6%e0
Comparator
control experimente0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sclerotium rolfsii sacc induced wilting of between 4 and 12% on cowpea seedlings treated with plant extract under field conditions while about 39.6% incidence of cowpea seedlings wilting was observed under control experiment on the same experimental plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts significantly increased cowpea seedling height and shelf life in both seasons.

Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
plant height, shelf lifee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both the wet and dry seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extracts increased significantly the plant height, shelf life, relative water content and chlorophyll contents of the cowpea seedlings during both the wet and dry season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts significantly increased relative water and chlorophyll contents.

Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
relative water content and chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both the wet and dry seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extracts increased significantly the plant height, shelf life, relative water content and chlorophyll contents of the cowpea seedlings during both the wet and dry season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts significantly reduced transpiration and stomatal aperture in both seasons.

Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
transpiration rate and stomata aperturee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the extracts significantly (p = 0.05) reduced transpiration rate and stomata aperture of treated plant in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts significantly enhanced leaf area index and branches per plant versus controls.

Treatment
these extractse0
Outcome
Leaf Area Index (LAI) number of branches and ponds per plante0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of these extracts on the cowpea plants significantly enhanced the Leaf Area Index (LAI) number of branches and ponds per plant, total dry matter per plant, weight per pod, 100 grains weight and grain yield in both season when compared with the values obtained from control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts significantly enhanced total dry matter, pod weight and 100-grain weight versus controls.

Treatment
these extractse0
Outcome
total dry matter per plant, weight per pod, 100 grains weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of these extracts on the cowpea plants significantly enhanced the Leaf Area Index (LAI) number of branches and ponds per plant, total dry matter per plant, weight per pod, 100 grains weight and grain yield in both season when compared with the values obtained from control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts significantly enhanced grain yield versus controls.

Treatment
these extractse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of these extracts on the cowpea plants significantly enhanced the Leaf Area Index (LAI) number of branches and ponds per plant, total dry matter per plant, weight per pod, 100 grains weight and grain yield in both season when compared with the values obtained from control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts inhibited release of current photosynthates from treated plants.

Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
release of current photosynthethatese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extracts also inhibited the release of current photosynthethates from treated plants thus maintaining the water status of plant and also making photosynthethates which can be oxidized to release energy needed for growth available to treated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–186 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts maintained plant water status and photosynthate availability.

Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
water status of plante0
Qualifier
making photosynthethates which can be oxidized to release energy needed for growth available to treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extracts also inhibited the release of current photosynthethates from treated plants thus maintaining the water status of plant and also making photosynthethates which can be oxidized to release energy needed for growth available to treated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–186 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

botanical · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

botanical · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 78 positive, 2 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

botanical · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 60 positive, 45 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

botanical · Agroathelia rolfsii · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · physiology: gas exchange · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.