Paper · 2007 · International Agrophysics

Corn-stalk lodging and borer damage as influenced by varying corn densities and planting geometry with soybean (Glycine max. L. Merrill)

B. C. Echezona

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cultural practices which increase the amount of insect pressure can also increase the amount of lodging that occurs in the corn crop. Studies were therefore carried out, in the late crop- ping seasons of 2002 and 2003, on the effect of corn planting densi- ties and geometry with soybean on corn lodging and infestations by stem borers. Treatments comprised three corn population densities of 40 000, 60 000 and 80 000 plants ha -1 and three geometrical arrangements of corn-soybean mixtures of 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3, in all possible combinations. There were also three sole crop populations of corn and one of soybean. This resulted in 13 treatments which were laid out in field plots in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Results of the studies showed that increasing corn population significantly (P<0.05) increased corn-stalk lodging and plant height, but significantly reduced the stalk diameter, shoot dry weight and infestations and damage by borers on corn, as well as the grain yields of corn and soybean. This is such that plants at 80 000 stands ha -1 recorded the highest amount of lodged stalks and the tallest plants, but the least stalk girth, shoot dry weight, infestation and damage by corn borers. The lowest grain yield was also obtained at this density. Differences in geometrical arrangements of corn-soybean and its interaction effects with planting density among these parameters did not attain any level of statistical significance. Similarly, the effect of intercropping corn with soybean did not produce any significant result on corn with respect to these parameters. These results are discussed in the light of corn planting densities and geometric arrangements with soybean, on corn production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing corn density significantly increased lodging and plant height.

Treatment
increasing corn populatione0
Outcome
corn-stalk lodging and plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing corn population significantly (P<0.05) increased corn-stalk lodging and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing corn density significantly reduced stalk diameter and shoot dry weight.

Treatment
increasing corn populatione0
Outcome
stalk diameter, shoot dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing corn population significantly (P<0.05) increased corn-stalk lodging and plant height, but significantly reduced the stalk diameter, shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing corn density significantly reduced borer infestation and damage.

Treatment
increasing corn populatione0
Interactor
borerse0pest
Outcome
infestations and damage by borers on corne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing corn population significantly (P<0.05) increased corn-stalk lodging and plant height, but significantly reduced the stalk diameter, shoot dry weight and infestations and damage by borers on corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing corn density significantly reduced corn and soybean grain yields.

Treatment
increasing corn populatione0
Outcome
grain yields of corn and soybeane0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing corn population significantly (P<0.05) increased corn-stalk lodging and plant height, but significantly reduced the stalk diameter, shoot dry weight and infestations and damage by borers on corn, as well as the grain yields of corn and soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting geometry and its interaction with density had no significant effects on the measured parameters.

Taxon
corn-soybeane0
Treatment
geometrical arrangements of corn-soybeane0
Outcome
these parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in geometrical arrangements of corn-soybean and its interaction effects with planting density among these parameters did not attain any level of statistical significance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn-soybean intercropping had no significant effect on the measured corn parameters.

Treatment
intercropping corn with soybeane0
Outcome
these parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of intercropping corn with soybean did not produce any significant result on corn with respect to these parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1621 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

70 papers: 48 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 31 positive, 22 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 60 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.