Paper · 1999 · Annals of Applied Biology

Microbial population dynamics on Golden Delicious apples from bud to harvest and effect of fungicide applications

N. TEIXIDÓ; J. USALL; N. MAGAN; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summary The microbial population dynamics on apples cv. Golden Delicious were analysed every 15 days between bud and harvest in a fully replicated experiment in northern Spain in 1994 and 1995. The total microbial populations varied with developmental stage, and with prevailing climatic conditions. The predominant mycroflora were the filamentous fungi Cladosporium and Alternaria spp. and white and pink yeasts. Other genera isolated included mainly species of Epicoccum, Fusarium and Acremonium. However, the most important post‐harvest pathogens Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea were seldom isolated from ripening apples. Maximum total filamentous fungal populations occurred after fruit set and during early ripening [2 × 10 4 cfu (colony‐forming units) g ‐1 approximately] while those of bacteria were maximum at bud stage (3.5 × 10 5 and 3.0 × 10 4 cfu g ‐1 in 1994 and 1995 respectively). White yeasts were more numerous than pink yeasts. Endophytic infection of apple buds by Alternaria spp., responsible for core rot, was found in almost all bud tissue. By contrast, Cladosporium spp. were initially isolated later from 12.5–50% of tissue samples during blooming and fruit set. The impact of a four‐spray fungicide regime during apple development significantly decreased the total filamentous fungal populations in both years, and that of Cladosporium spp. in 1994. However, bacterial populations were often higher on apples from fungicide‐treated plots. Fungicide sprays decreased populations of Cladosporium, Alternaria and white yeasts for a maximum of up to 15–30 days after application. Fungicide application had little effect on endophytic infection of apples by Alternaria spp. between bud and harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total microbial populations varied with developmental stage and climatic conditions.

Organ / stage
developmental stagee0
Outcome
total microbial populationse0
Setting
prevailing climatic conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total microbial populations varied with developmental stage, and with prevailing climatic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Golden Delicious apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cladosporium, Alternaria, and white and pink yeasts predominated in apple microflora.

Interactor
CladosporiumCladosporiume0other
Outcome
predominant mycroflorae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cladosporium
Cladosporium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAjay Kumar Chaurasiya · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The predominant mycroflora were the filamentous fungi Cladosporium and Alternaria spp. and white and pink yeasts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“Golden Delicious apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea were seldom isolated from ripening apples.

Organ / stage
ripening applese0
Interactor
Penicillium expansumPenicillium expansume0pathogen
Second interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
seldom isolatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · Second interactorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea were seldom isolated from ripening apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total filamentous fungal populations peaked after fruit set and during early ripening at about 2 × 10 4 cfu g ‐1.

Organ / stage
after fruit set and during early ripeninge0
Outcome
total filamentous fungal populationse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
2 × 10 4 cfu (colony‐forming units) g ‐1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum total filamentous fungal populations occurred after fruit set and during early ripening [2 × 10 4 cfu (colony‐forming units) g ‐1 approximately]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial populations peaked at bud stage, with 3.5 × 10 5 cfu g ‐1 in 1994 and 3.0 × 10 4 cfu g ‐1 in 1995.

Organ / stage
bud stagee0
Outcome
bacteriae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.5 × 10 5 and 3.0 × 10 4 cfu g ‐1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those of bacteria were maximum at bud stage (3.5 × 10 5 and 3.0 × 10 4 cfu g ‐1 in 1994 and 1995 respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White yeasts were more numerous than pink yeasts.

Outcome
White yeastse0
Direction
more numerouse0
Comparator
pink yeastse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“White yeasts were more numerous than pink yeasts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria infected almost all apple bud tissue endophytically.

Organ / stage
bud tissuee0
Interactor
Alternaria spp.Alternariae0pathogen
Outcome
Endophytic infectione0
Qualifier
almost alle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Endophytic infection of apple buds by Alternaria spp., responsible for core rot, was found in almost all bud tissue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1072 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cladosporium was isolated from 12.5–50% of tissue samples during blooming and fruit set.

Organ / stage
during blooming and fruit sete0
Interactor
Cladosporium spp.Cladosporiume0other
Outcome
Cladosporium spp. were initially isolatede0
Value
12.5–50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cladosporium
Cladosporium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAjay Kumar Chaurasiya · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cladosporium spp. were initially isolated later from 12.5–50% of tissue samples during blooming and fruit set.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four fungicide sprays significantly reduced total filamentous fungal populations in both years.

Treatment
four‐spray fungicide regimee0
Outcome
total filamentous fungal populationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a four‐spray fungicide regime during apple development significantly decreased the total filamentous fungal populations in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide sprays significantly reduced Cladosporium populations in 1994.

Treatment
fungicide applicationst0
Interactor
Cladosporium spp.Cladosporiume0other
Outcome
Cladosporium spp.e0
Qualifier
1994e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cladosporium
Cladosporium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAjay Kumar Chaurasiya · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and that of Cladosporium spp. in 1994.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Golden Delicious apples from bud to harvest and effect of fungicide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial populations were often higher on fungicide-treated apples.

Treatment
fungicide‐treated plotse0
Outcome
bacterial populationse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial populations were often higher on apples from fungicide‐treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide sprays reduced Cladosporium, Alternaria, and white yeast populations for up to 15–30 days.

Treatment
Fungicide sprayse0
Outcome
populations of Cladosporium, Alternaria and white yeastse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
up to 15–30 days after applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide sprays decreased populations of Cladosporium, Alternaria and white yeasts for a maximum of up to 15–30 days after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide had little effect on endophytic Alternaria infection from bud to harvest.

Treatment
Fungicide applicatione0
Interactor
Alternaria spp.Alternariae0pathogen
Outcome
endophytic infection of apples by Alternaria spp.e0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide application had little effect on endophytic infection of apples by Alternaria spp. between bud and harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1728 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Alternaria · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 30 positive, 11 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fungicide · soil: biology · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.