Paper · 2010 · Molecular Plant Pathology

The beneficial effect of Trichoderma spp. on tomato is modulated by the plant genotype

MARINA TUCCI; MICHELINA RUOCCO; LUIGI DE MASI; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
337
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rhizosphere-competent fungi of the genus Trichoderma are widely used as biofertilizers and biopesticides in commercial formulates because of the multiple beneficial effects on plant growth and disease resistance. In this work, we demonstrate that genetic variability among wild and cultivated tomato lines affects the outcome of the interaction with two 'elite' biocontrol strains of T. atroviride and T. harzianum. The beneficial response, which included enhanced growth and systemic resistance against Botrytis cinerea, was clearly evident for some, but not all, the tested lines. At least in one case (line M82), treatment with the biocontrol agents had no effect or was even detrimental. Expression studies on defence-related genes suggested that the fungus is able to trigger, in the responsive lines, a long-lasting up-regulation of the salicylic acid pathway in the absence of a pathogen, possibly activating a priming mechanism in the plant. Consequently, infection with B. cinerea on plants pretreated with Trichoderma is followed by enhanced activation of jasmonate-responsive genes, eventually boosting systemic resistance to the pathogen in a plant genotype-dependent manner. Our data indicate that, at least in tomato, the Trichoderma induced systemic resistance mechanism is much more complex than considered so far, and the ability of the plant to benefit from this symbiotic-like interaction can be genetically improved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic variability among wild and cultivated tomato lines affects the outcome of the interaction with the biocontrol strains T. atroviride and T. harzianum.

Material
wild and cultivated tomato linese0
Interactor
T. atrovirideTrichoderma atroviridee0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
outcome of the interactione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma atroviride
Trichoderma atroviride · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetic variability among wild and cultivated tomato lines affects the outcome of the interaction with two 'elite' biocontrol strains of T. atroviride and T. harzianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The beneficial response to the Trichoderma strains, including enhanced growth and systemic resistance against Botrytis cinerea, was clearly evident for some but not all tested tomato lines.

Treatment
biocontrol strains of T. atroviride and T. harzianume1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
T. atrovirideTrichoderma atroviridee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
enhanced growth and systemic resistance against Botrytis cinereae0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma atroviride
Trichoderma atroviride · Second interactorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The beneficial response, which included enhanced growth and systemic resistance against Botrytis cinerea, was clearly evident for some, but not all, the tested lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“genetic variability among wild and cultivated tomato lines affects the outcome of the interaction with two 'elite' biocontrol strains of T. atroviride and T. harzianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In tomato line M82, treatment with the biocontrol agents had no effect or was even detrimental.

Material
line M82e0
Treatment
treatment with the biocontrol agentse0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
no effect or was even detrimentale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Trichoderma spp. on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“At least in one case (line M82), treatment with the biocontrol agents had no effect or was even detrimental”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–690 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expression studies on defence-related genes suggested that the fungus triggers, in the responsive lines, a long-lasting up-regulation of the salicylic acid pathway in the absence of a pathogen, possibly activating a priming mechanism.

Gene
defence-related genese0
Outcome
up-regulation of the salicylic acid pathwaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Trichoderma spp. on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Expression studies on defence-related genes suggested that the fungus is able to trigger, in the responsive lines, a long-lasting up-regulation of the salicylic acid pathway in the absence of a pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection with B. cinerea on tomato plants pretreated with Trichoderma was followed by enhanced activation of jasmonate-responsive genes, boosting systemic resistance in a plant genotype-dependent manner.

Treatment
pretreated with Trichodermae0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activation of jasmonate-responsive genese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Trichoderma spp. on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“infection with B. cinerea on plants pretreated with Trichoderma is followed by enhanced activation of jasmonate-responsive genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1092 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.