Paper · 1969 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Plant Growth in Polyethylene Glycol Solutions in Relation to the Osmotic Potential of the Root Medium and the Leaf Water Balance

D. W. LAWLOR

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
31
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The changes in leaf extension, plant dryweight, leaf area, net assimilation rate (E), relative growth-rate (RW), and relative leaf growth-rate (RL), have been studied for four species grown for 2 weeks in solutions of polyethylene glycol 4000 of controlled osmotic potentials. All aspects of growth were decreased by decreasing the osmotic potential (πsol) of the root medium and the leaf water potential (π), and ceased when π/ was greater than — 10 bars in bean, cotton, maize. These plants were more susceptible than ryegrass to water stress. Growth of bean stopped at π equal to about —6 bars, but even at —10 bars ryegrass was capable of some growth. Slight decrease in π from the values in the control plants decreased growth during the first week but partial recovery was apparent during the second week's growth in solution culture, when leaf extension, E, RL and RW increased in plants subjected to stress. Examination of the water balance, water potential, osmotic potential and turgor of the leaf in relation to relative water content suggests that recovery was related to increased turgor and that the ability of the plants to grow at reduced values of the osmotic potential of the root medium and of the leaf water potential depend on the maintenance of turgor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All aspects of growth in bean, cotton and maize decreased as the osmotic potential of the root medium decreased.

Taxon
bean, cotton, maizee3
Treatment
polyethylene glycol 4000e1
Outcome
All aspects of growthe2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
decreasing the osmotic potentiale2

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Verbatim

e0

“studied for four species grown for 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“solutions of polyethylene glycol 4000 of controlled osmotic potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–275 · show in text ↑
e2

“All aspects of growth were decreased by decreasing the osmotic potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–349 · show in text ↑
e3

“ceased when π/ was greater than — 10 bars in bean, cotton, maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of bean, cotton and maize ceased when leaf water potential was above -10 bars.

Taxon
bean, cotton, maizee3
Treatment
polyethylene glycol 4000e1
Outcome
growthe2
Direction
ceasede3
Value
10 barse3

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Verbatim

e1

“solutions of polyethylene glycol 4000 of controlled osmotic potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–275 · show in text ↑
e2

“All aspects of growth were decreased by decreasing the osmotic potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–349 · show in text ↑
e3

“ceased when π/ was greater than — 10 bars in bean, cotton, maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of bean stopped at a leaf water potential of about -6 bars.

Taxon
beane4
Treatment
polyethylene glycol 4000e1
Outcome
Growthe4
Direction
stoppede4
Value
6 barse4

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Verbatim

e1

“solutions of polyethylene glycol 4000 of controlled osmotic potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–275 · show in text ↑
e4

“Growth of bean stopped at π equal to about —6 bars, but even at —10 bars ryegrass was capable of some growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–654 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ryegrass remained capable of some growth even at -10 bars.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume4
Outcome
some growthe4

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Growth of bean stopped at π equal to about —6 bars, but even at —10 bars ryegrass was capable of some growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–654 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean, cotton and maize were more susceptible to water stress than ryegrass.

Taxon
bean, cotton, maizee3
Outcome
to water stresse5
Direction
more susceptiblee5
Comparator
ryegrasse5

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e3

“ceased when π/ was greater than — 10 bars in bean, cotton, maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–478 · show in text ↑
e5

“These plants were more susceptible than ryegrass to water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A slight decrease in leaf water potential decreased growth during the first week.

Taxon
four speciese0
Treatment
Slight decreasee6
Outcome
growthe6
Direction
decreasede6
Qualifier
during the first weeke6
Comparator
control plantse6

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“studied for four species grown for 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–201 · show in text ↑
e6

“Slight decrease in π from the values in the control plants decreased growth during the first week but partial recovery was apparent during the second week's growth in solution culture, when leaf extension, E, RL and RW increased in plants subjected to stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extension, E and RL increased in stressed plants during the second week of solution culture.

Taxon
four speciese0
Treatment
Slight decreasee6
Outcome
leaf extension, E, RLe6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
second weeke6
Comparator
control plantse6

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“studied for four species grown for 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–201 · show in text ↑
e6

“Slight decrease in π from the values in the control plants decreased growth during the first week but partial recovery was apparent during the second week's growth in solution culture, when leaf extension, E, RL and RW increased in plants subjected to stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RW increased in stressed plants during the second week of solution culture.

Taxon
four speciese0
Treatment
Slight decreasee6
Outcome
RWe6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
second weeke6
Comparator
control plantse6

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“studied for four species grown for 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–201 · show in text ↑
e6

“Slight decrease in π from the values in the control plants decreased growth during the first week but partial recovery was apparent during the second week's growth in solution culture, when leaf extension, E, RL and RW increased in plants subjected to stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–914 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery of growth under water stress was related to increased turgor.

Taxon
four speciese0
Outcome
recoverye7
Qualifier
increased turgore7

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“studied for four species grown for 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–201 · show in text ↑
e7

“recovery was related to increased turgor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1100 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ability of plants to grow at reduced osmotic potential depends on maintenance of turgor.

Taxon
four speciese0
Outcome
the ability of the plants to growe7
Qualifier
maintenance of turgore7

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“studied for four species grown for 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–201 · show in text ↑
e7

“the ability of the plants to grow at reduced values of the osmotic potential of the root medium and of the leaf water potential depend on the maintenance of turgor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1273 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene glycol) · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

poly(ethylene glycol) · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

40 papers: 12 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

poly(ethylene glycol) · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.