Paper · 2018 · Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences

EFFECT OF SOME NUTRIENTS ON GROWTH, YIELD AND FIBER QUALITY OF EGYPTIAN COTTON UNDER SALINE CONDITION

Amira Drwish; R. Abd Rabou; A. Zaky; et al.

12
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Two pot experiments were carried out at the greenhouse of the Cotton Research Institute, Agric. Res. Cent., Giza, Egypt during 2015 and 2016 seasons to study the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients to improve the performance of cotton plant under irrigation of saline water to increase growth, yield and yield components and fiber quality of Giza 90 cotton cultivar. The experimental design was a split plot design with four replications. Main plots included saline water solutions treatments (control, 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 ppm), sub plot included four nutrients application (Potassium Humate, Algex, Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) 6000 and Potassein compared with control). The obtained results could be summarized as follows: Irrigation with saline water over seasons significantly decreased plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of open bolls /plant, boll weight, seed index, seed cotton yield per plant, fiber length, uniformity index, fiber strength and micronaire value, while, lint % was significantly increased. Nutrients application had significant effect on growth parameters, yield and its components and fiber properties under study, All nutrients treatments gave the highest values of growth parameters, yield and its components and fiber properties as compared with the control in both seasons. In general, plants sprayed with PEG gave the highest averages of plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant. Potassium Humate gave the highest averages of yield and its components and fiber properties followed by plants sprayed with Algex, while the plants sprayed with PEG as came the last in these respect in both seasons. Interaction between irrigation with slain water and nutrients application by salinity tolerance inducers had a significant effect on plant height, number of fruiting branches per plant, boll weight, number of open bolls /plant, seed index, seed cotton yield /plant and fiber quality under study in both seasons. Plants treated with foliar nutrients under salinity condation scored the highest average of growth parameters, yield and its components and fiber properties. Potassium Humate, Algex, PEG and Potassein applications to plants under normal and salinity conditions had positive effects on improving the performance of cotton plants, which increased plant growth and yield especially under salinity conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation decreased plant height, fruiting branches per plant and open bolls per plant.

Treatment
Irrigation with saline watere1
Outcome
plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of open bolls /plante1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation with saline water over seasons significantly decreased plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of open bolls /plant, boll weight, seed index, seed cotton yield per plant, fiber length, uniformity index, fiber strength and micronaire value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“saline water solutions treatments (control, 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation decreased boll weight, seed index and seed cotton yield per plant.

Treatment
Irrigation with saline watere1
Outcome
boll weight, seed index, seed cotton yield per plante1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation with saline water over seasons significantly decreased plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of open bolls /plant, boll weight, seed index, seed cotton yield per plant, fiber length, uniformity index, fiber strength and micronaire value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“saline water solutions treatments (control, 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation decreased fiber length, uniformity index and fiber strength.

Treatment
Irrigation with saline watere1
Outcome
fiber length, uniformity index, fiber strengthe1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation with saline water over seasons significantly decreased plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of open bolls /plant, boll weight, seed index, seed cotton yield per plant, fiber length, uniformity index, fiber strength and micronaire value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“saline water solutions treatments (control, 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation decreased micronaire value.

Treatment
Irrigation with saline watere1
Outcome
micronaire valuee1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation with saline water over seasons significantly decreased plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of open bolls /plant, boll weight, seed index, seed cotton yield per plant, fiber length, uniformity index, fiber strength and micronaire value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“saline water solutions treatments (control, 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation significantly increased lint percentage.

Treatment
saline watere2
Outcome
lint %e3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e3

“while, lint % was significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1059 · show in text ↑
e2

“saline water solutions treatments (control, 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All nutrient treatments gave higher growth, yield and fiber values than the control.

Treatment
Nutrients applicatione4
Outcome
growth parameters, yield and its components and fiber propertiese5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nutrients application had significant effect on growth parameters, yield and its components and fiber properties under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1185 · show in text ↑
e5

“All nutrients treatments gave the highest values of growth parameters, yield and its components and fiber properties as compared with the control in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants sprayed with PEG gave the highest plant height and fruiting branches per plant.

Treatment
plants sprayed with PEGe6
Outcome
plant height, number of fruiting branches/plante6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e6

“In general, plants sprayed with PEG gave the highest averages of plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium Humate gave the highest yield, yield components and fiber properties.

Treatment
Potassium Humatee7
Outcome
yield and its components and fiber propertiese7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e7

“Potassium Humate gave the highest averages of yield and its components and fiber properties followed by plants sprayed with Algex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants sprayed with PEG came last for yield, yield components and fiber properties.

Treatment
plants sprayed with PEGe1
Outcome
yield and its components and fiber propertiese1
Direction
as came the laste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potassium Humate gave the highest averages of yield and its components and fiber properties followed by plants sprayed with Algex, while the plants sprayed with PEG as came the last in these respect in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1678 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of saline irrigation and nutrient application had a significant effect on plant height, boll weight and fiber quality.

Treatment
irrigation with slain watere2
Outcome
plant height, number of fruiting branches per plant, boll weighte2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e2

“Interaction between irrigation with slain water and nutrients application by salinity tolerance inducers had a significant effect on plant height, number of fruiting branches per plant, boll weight, number of open bolls /plant, seed index, seed cotton yield /plant and fiber quality under study in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrients under salinity gave the highest growth, yield and fiber values.

Treatment
foliar nutrientse3
Outcome
growth parameters, yield and its components and fiber propertiese3
Direction
higheste3
Qualifier
under salinity condatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plants treated with foliar nutrients under salinity condation scored the highest average of growth parameters, yield and its components and fiber properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1992–2148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium Humate, Algex, PEG and Potassein applications had positive effects that increased cotton growth and yield, especially under salinity.

Treatment
Potassium Humate, Algex, PEG and Potassein applicationse4
Outcome
plant growth and yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
especially under salinity conditionse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of cotton plant to application of some nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–219 · show in text ↑
e4

“Potassium Humate, Algex, PEG and Potassein applications to plants under normal and salinity conditions had positive effects on improving the performance of cotton plants, which increased plant growth and yield especially under salinity conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2150–2396 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene glycol) · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

potassium · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

57 papers: 44 positive, 13 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

salinity · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

58 papers: 9 positive, 49 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

salinity · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

salinity · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 16 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.