Paper · 2013 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Use of Nitrification Inhibitor DMPP to Improve Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency in Citrus Trees

Belén Martínez-Alcántara; Ana Quiñones; Carolina Polo; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In citrus orchards, nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUE) is between 40 to 60% where any excess of nitrate is subjected to leaching below the rooting zone. The compound, 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) inhibits the nitrification process in soil thus reducing/delaying nitrate leaching. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of DMPP added to ammonium sulphate (AS+DMPP), compared to ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN), in fertigation of bearing orange trees grown outdoors in drainage lysimeters. Fertilizers were 15N-labeled to trace N through soil-plant-drainage system. Soil was sampled monthly from April to December and trees were destructively harvested in December. In trees fertilized with AS+DMPP, increased biomass was observed with a more profuse development of root system and higher fruit yield. Fertilizer 15N uptake significantly increased with DMPP addition. In AS+DMPP amended soils, increased values of -15N and lower -N concentrations were recorded from April to June as evidence of the inhibitory effect of DMPP on the nitrification process during this period. In CPN and AS fertilized soils, 15N losses in drainage solutions represented 9-10% of the fertilizer supplied whereas less than 3% was leached when DMPP was added. At the end of the cycle, highest NUE was recorded in the AS+DMPP treatment (69%), while CPN and AS had lower values (61% and 54%, respectively). Therefore, the use of DMPP enables a more efficient utilization of the fertilizer-N in citrus trees, minimizing the risk of nitrate-N pollution in groundwater. However, DMPP supply should be considered during spring fertilization, since high temperatures of summer months significantly reduced its activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS+DMPP increased orange tree biomass.

Taxon
orange treese2
Treatment
AS+DMPPe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)e1

Verbatim

e0

“In trees fertilized with AS+DMPP, increased biomass was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–783 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“bearing orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS+DMPP produced a more profuse root system.

Taxon
orange treese2
Treatment
AS+DMPPe0
Outcome
development of root systeme0
Direction
more profusee0
Comparator
ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)e1

Verbatim

e0

“In trees fertilized with AS+DMPP, increased biomass was observed with a more profuse development of root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“bearing orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS+DMPP raised fruit yield.

Taxon
orange treese2
Treatment
AS+DMPPe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)e1

Verbatim

e0

“In trees fertilized with AS+DMPP, increased biomass was observed with a more profuse development of root system and higher fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“bearing orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP addition significantly increased fertilizer 15N uptake.

Taxon
orange treese2
Treatment
DMPP additione0
Outcome
Fertilizer 15N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)e1

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer 15N uptake significantly increased with DMPP addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“bearing orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS+DMPP soils had increased -15N values during April to June.

Taxon
orange treese2
Treatment
AS+DMPPe0
Outcome
values of -15Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
from April to Junee0
Comparator
ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)e1

Verbatim

e0

“In AS+DMPP amended soils, increased values of -15N and lower -N concentrations were recorded from April to June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“bearing orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS+DMPP soils had lower -N concentrations from April to June.

Taxon
orange treese2
Treatment
AS+DMPPe0
Outcome
-N concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
from April to Junee0
Comparator
ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)e1

Verbatim

e0

“In AS+DMPP amended soils, increased values of -15N and lower -N concentrations were recorded from April to June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“bearing orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP reduced fertilizer 15N loss in drainage to less than 3%, versus 9-10% with CPN or AS.

Taxon
orange treese1
Treatment
DMPP was addede0
Outcome
15N losses in drainage solutionse0
Direction
less thane0
Value
less than 3%e0
Qualifier
9-10% of the fertilizer suppliede0
Comparator
CPN and ASe0

Verbatim

e0

“In CPN and AS fertilized soils, 15N losses in drainage solutions represented 9-10% of the fertilizer supplied whereas less than 3% was leached when DMPP was added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“bearing orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS+DMPP gave the highest nitrogen uptake efficiency, 69%, versus 61% for CPN and 54% for AS.

Taxon
orange treese1
Treatment
AS+DMPPe0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
69%e0
Qualifier
61% and 54%, respectivelye0
Comparator
CPN and ASe0

Verbatim

e0

“highest NUE was recorded in the AS+DMPP treatment (69%), while CPN and AS had lower values (61% and 54%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1434 · show in text ↑
e1

“bearing orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High summer temperatures significantly reduced DMPP activity.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
high temperatures of summer monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high temperatures of summer months significantly reduced its activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1742 · show in text ↑
e1

“citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1535 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend DMPP supply during spring fertilization.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse1
Outcome
DMPP supply should be considered during spring fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMPP supply should be considered during spring fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1665 · show in text ↑
e1

“citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1535 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ammonium sulfate · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.