Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Roll of Organic Manures and Different Doses of N, P, K on Growth, Establishment and Percentage of Survival of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) Grafted Plants

Jayram Verma; Sevan Das Khunte; Sandeep Lakra; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted the Crop Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Allahabad School of Agriculture, SHIATS, Allahabad (U.P.) The present investigation entitled Roll of organic manures and different doses of N,P,K on growth, establishment and percentage of survival of Sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) grafted plants. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with 03 replications and 13 treatments separately. The material used in the experiment was organic manures and inorganic fertilizers (NPK). Studies showed that significant effect on maximum plant height (62.55 cm), number of Branches (9.22), number of Leaves(49.10), petiole length (1.90 cm), Plant Girth (8.53 cm), Plant Survival percentage (100%), and minimum Dead plant percentage (0.0%) was recorded in treatment with T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potash under Allahabad agro-climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 (8 kg farm yard manure plus 120 g N, 45 g P and 30 g K per plant) gave the maximum plant height of 62.55 cm in grafted sweet orange.

Taxon
Citrus sinensis OsbeckCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potashe1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
maximume2
Value
62.55 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Citrus sinensis Osbeck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–922 · show in text ↑
e2

“maximum plant height (62.55 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 gave 9.22 branches per grafted sweet orange plant, the best value.

Taxon
Citrus sinensis OsbeckCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potashe1
Outcome
number of Branchese2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
9.22e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Citrus sinensis Osbeck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–922 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of Branches (9.22)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 gave 49.10 leaves per grafted sweet orange plant, the best value.

Taxon
Citrus sinensis OsbeckCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potashe1
Outcome
number of Leavese2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
49.10e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Citrus sinensis Osbeck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–922 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of Leaves(49.10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 gave a petiole length of 1.90 cm in grafted sweet orange.

Taxon
Citrus sinensis OsbeckCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potashe1
Outcome
petiole lengthe2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
1.90 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Citrus sinensis Osbeck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–922 · show in text ↑
e2

“petiole length (1.90 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 gave a plant girth of 8.53 cm in grafted sweet orange.

Taxon
Citrus sinensis OsbeckCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potashe1
Outcome
Plant Girthe2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
8.53 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Citrus sinensis Osbeck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–922 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant Girth (8.53 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 gave 100% plant survival in grafted sweet orange.

Taxon
Citrus sinensis OsbeckCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potashe1
Outcome
Plant Survival percentagee2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
100%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Citrus sinensis Osbeck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–922 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant Survival percentage (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 gave the minimum dead plant percentage of 0.0% in grafted sweet orange.

Taxon
Citrus sinensis OsbeckCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potashe1
Outcome
Dead plant percentagee2
Direction
minimume2
Value
0.0%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Citrus sinensis Osbeck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 8 kg / plant Farm Yard Manure + 120 g / plant Nitrogen, 45 g / plant Phosphorus and 30 g/plant Potash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–922 · show in text ↑
e2

“minimum Dead plant percentage (0.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–785 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
    AS+DMPP raised fruit yield.

    Use of Nitrification Inhibitor DMPP to Improve Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency in Citrus Trees · 2013 · compared with ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)

    Same direction

  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
    AS+DMPP increased orange tree biomass.

    Use of Nitrification Inhibitor DMPP to Improve Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency in Citrus Trees · 2013 · compared with ammonium sulphate (AS) and calcium-potassium nitrate (CPN)

    Same direction

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

potassium · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Fertilizer without potassium gave intermediate fruit set, fruit number and yield.

    Effect of Balanced Fertilization and Fertilizer Levels on Navel Orange Yield and Fruit Quality · 2012 · compared with farmer treatment

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 54 positive, 2 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

nitrogen · survival · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.