Paper · 2012 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Differential growth response of rice genotypes based on quiescence mechanism under flash flooding stress

Salah El-Hendawy; Chiharu Sone; Osamu Ito; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The main strategies enabling rice plants to cope with flash flooding stress require growth regulation during submergence and subsequent rapid growth recovery after de-submergence. The objective of this study was to characterize the response of 56 diverse contrasting rice genotypes to submergence and their recovery following de-submergence. Among these genotypes, nine lines had been developed for anaerobic germination and submergence tolerance (AG + Sub1) by IRRI. Fourteen-day-old plants were submerged completely in water for 7 days. Subsequently, the plants were kept under normal rice-cultivation conditions as the control for a further period of 5 days. The tested genotypes were generally classified into three clusters based on shoot elongation rate of submerged to non-submerged treatments (ratio) during submergence period and chlorophyll contents during recovery period using Ward's method. The genotypes in clusters I include most of AG + Sub1 lines and tolerant genotype FR13A adapted to submergence stress, which get the benefits of quiescence mechanism during submergence coupled with maintenance of higher chlorophyll content during recovery period. In contrast, the cluster III spanned most of intolerant genotypes such as IR42 by enhancing shoot elongation through escape mechanism in response to submergence. This mechanism negatively affected the plant growth recovery due to a great reduction of chlorophyll contents during the recovery period. The genotypes placed in cluster II followed the similar trend as cluster I during the submergence and recovery periods in addition of increases in shoot fresh weight during submergence period. This finding suggests that other mechanisms along with quiescence might be associated with submergence stress in the genotypes placed in cluster II. In conclusion, the contrasting rice genotypes expressed differential growth responses in genotypes with lower shoot elongation ratio using different quiescence strategies during submergence period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice genotypes formed three clusters based on shoot elongation ratio and recovery chlorophyll.

Outcome
classified into three clusterse0
Value
three clusterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tested genotypes were generally classified into three clusters based on shoot elongation rate of submerged to non-submerged treatments (ratio) during submergence period and chlorophyll contents during recovery period using Ward's method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster I included most AG + Sub1 lines and FR13A adapted to submergence.

Material
AG + Sub1 linese0
Outcome
adapted to submergence stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotypes in clusters I include most of AG + Sub1 lines and tolerant genotype FR13A adapted to submergence stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster I maintained higher chlorophyll during recovery after submergence.

Material
AG + Sub1 linese1
Organ / stage
recovery periode0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quiescence mechanism during submergence coupled with maintenance of higher chlorophyll content during recovery period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“The genotypes in clusters I include most of AG + Sub1 lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster III intolerant genotypes such as IR42 increased shoot elongation under submergence.

Material
IR42e0
Treatment
submergencee0
Outcome
shoot elongatione0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cluster III spanned most of intolerant genotypes such as IR42 by enhancing shoot elongation through escape mechanism in response to submergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster III rice genotypes showed reduced chlorophyll during recovery.

Material
IR42e1
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This mechanism negatively affected the plant growth recovery due to a great reduction of chlorophyll contents during the recovery period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“cluster III spanned most of intolerant genotypes such as IR42”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster III rice genotypes had impaired plant growth recovery.

Material
IR42e1
Outcome
plant growth recoverye0
Direction
negatively affectede0
Qualifier
great reduction of chlorophyll contentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This mechanism negatively affected the plant growth recovery due to a great reduction of chlorophyll contents during the recovery period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“cluster III spanned most of intolerant genotypes such as IR42”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster II rice genotypes increased shoot fresh weight during submergence.

Material
cluster IIe0
Treatment
submergencee0
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotypes placed in cluster II followed the similar trend as cluster I during the submergence and recovery periods in addition of increases in shoot fresh weight during submergence period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster II rice genotypes may use mechanisms besides quiescence in submergence stress.

Material
cluster IIe0
Outcome
submergence stresse0
Qualifier
other mechanisms along with quiescencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other mechanisms along with quiescence might be associated with submergence stress in the genotypes placed in cluster II.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

138 papers: 64 positive, 74 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

134 papers more in this group

See all 138 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.