Paper · 2015 · Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Agriculture

Effect of some micronutrients on growth and yield of wheat and its leaves and grain content of iron and boron

Hamzeh Mohmmad Rawashdeh; Florin Sala

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Field studies were carried out during the growing season 2012-13 and 2013-14 at Banat's university of agricultural sciences and veterinary medicine, Timisoara, Romania to study the effect of foliar Fe, B and Fe+B fertilizer at two growth stages on growth, yield and nutrient concentration in flag leaves and grains of wheat. The treatments were laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Two years average results show that treatment receiving 333g Fe ha -1 +167g B ha -1 at both growth stages ZGS21+ZGS41 produced the highest plant height (86.0 cm), flag leaf area (28.66 cm 2 ), chlorophyll content (58.0 SPAD value) and grain yield (518 gm m -2 ). All micronutrients (Fe, B and Fe+B) sprayed at both stages (ZGS21+ZGS41) significantly improved micronutrients concentration in wheat flag leaf and grains over control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined Fe and B treatment at both stages gave maximum wheat height of 86.0 cm.

Treatment
333g Fe ha -1 +167g B ha -1 at both growth stages ZGS21+ZGS41e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
86.0 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment receiving 333g Fe ha -1 +167g B ha -1 at both growth stages ZGS21+ZGS41 produced the highest plant height (86.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That combined treatment gave maximum flag leaf area of 28.66 cm 2.

Treatment
333g Fe ha -1 +167g B ha -1 at both growth stages ZGS21+ZGS41e0
Outcome
flag leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
28.66 cm 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment receiving 333g Fe ha -1 +167g B ha -1 at both growth stages ZGS21+ZGS41 produced the highest plant height (86.0 cm), flag leaf area (28.66 cm 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That combined treatment gave maximum chlorophyll content of 58.0 SPAD.

Treatment
333g Fe ha -1 +167g B ha -1 at both growth stages ZGS21+ZGS41e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
58.0 SPAD valuee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment receiving 333g Fe ha -1 +167g B ha -1 at both growth stages ZGS21+ZGS41 produced the highest plant height (86.0 cm), flag leaf area (28.66 cm 2 ), chlorophyll content (58.0 SPAD value)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That combined treatment gave maximum grain yield of 518 gm m -2.

Treatment
333g Fe ha -1 +167g B ha -1 at both growth stages ZGS21+ZGS41e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
518 gm m -2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment receiving 333g Fe ha -1 +167g B ha -1 at both growth stages ZGS21+ZGS41 produced the highest plant height (86.0 cm), flag leaf area (28.66 cm 2 ), chlorophyll content (58.0 SPAD value) and grain yield (518 gm m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe spray at both stages significantly improved micronutrient concentration in wheat flag leaf and grains over control.

Treatment
Fee0
Outcome
micronutrients concentration in wheat flag leaf and grainse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All micronutrients (Fe, B and Fe+B) sprayed at both stages (ZGS21+ZGS41) significantly improved micronutrients concentration in wheat flag leaf and grains over control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B spray at both stages significantly improved micronutrient concentration in wheat flag leaf and grains over control.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
micronutrients concentration in wheat flag leaf and grainse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All micronutrients (Fe, B and Fe+B) sprayed at both stages (ZGS21+ZGS41) significantly improved micronutrients concentration in wheat flag leaf and grains over control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Fe and B spray at both stages significantly improved micronutrient concentration in wheat flag leaf and grains over control.

Treatment
Fe+Be0
Outcome
micronutrients concentration in wheat flag leaf and grainse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All micronutrients (Fe, B and Fe+B) sprayed at both stages (ZGS21+ZGS41) significantly improved micronutrients concentration in wheat flag leaf and grains over control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–863 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

iron atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

54 papers: 41 positive, 13 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

boron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

stage · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

stage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 24 positive, 13 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.