Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation withholding decreased wheat total chlorophyll.

A claim from Effect of exogenous salicylic acid under irrigation withholding at different growth stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation withholding decreased wheat total chlorophyll.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation withholding conditions in different growth stagese0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–122
e0

“irrigation withholding conditions in different growth stages significantly decreased seed yield, RWC and total chlorophyll but by contrast increased membrane stability, proline content, SOD and CAT enzymes activity and also lipid and protein peroxidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1163

Title

Effect of exogenous salicylic acid under irrigation withholding at different growth stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

MA Dabzad; HRT Moghadam; H Zahedi International Journal of Natural Sciences 2016. doi:10.3329/ijns.v4i2.28601

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-8b2b8ea9786944e6cd0783481a35434c768ce3d15252c2746a2bc5462191ea3a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

stage · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
See all 8 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.