Paper · 2023 · Agricultural Water Management

Effects of differential irrigation and nitrogen reduction replacement on winter wheat yield and water productivity and nitrogen-use efficiency

Hongzheng Shen; Yunhe Gao; Kexin Sun; et al.

14
claims
24
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Rational irrigation and chemical nitrogen fertilizer increase crop yield, water productivity (WP), and nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE), but excessive amounts of water and nitrogen increase nitrogen loss and negatively affect the soil and environment. Controlled-release fertilizers and organic fertilizers can replace chemical fertilizers, but their mechanisms for crop growth, yield, and water and nitrogen use are still unclear. This study conducted a 2-year field experiment to quantify the effect of irrigation and nitrogen reduction replacement on winter wheat growth, yield, WP, and NUE. The results indicated that irrigation water of 90 mm per time decreased the WP and increased soil water storage and evapotranspiration (ET). Compared with the no-nitrogen treatment, irrigation and nitrogen reduction replacement increased the leaf area index and chlorophyll content by 26.5–47.0% and 17.7–31.5%, respectively. In addition, the average yield of winter wheat 2 years after treatment with 75% of the traditional nitrogen rate (75% U), the traditional nitrogen rate (U), polymer-coated urea (PCU), and urea combined with organic fertilizer (U+OM) increased by 68.2%, 85.1%, 81.9%, and 95.1%, respectively, and the average nitrogen uptake of grains increased by 90.0%, 117.5%, 111.9%, and 147.2%, respectively. Compared with the nitrate nitrogen after U treatment, the residual nitrate nitrogen in a 0–160-cm soil profile after 75% U, PCU, and U+OM treatments decreased by 42.0%, 25.4%, and 9.7%, respectively. The average NUE of winter wheat increased by 4.7–30.5% after 2 years. The yield of winter wheat was significantly correlated with physiological growth indices (except for ET and 1000-grain weight), WP, and NUE. Large amounts of irrigation water did not significantly increase winter wheat yield, WP, or NUE. Therefore, when the irrigation volume is 60 mm, winter wheat can be sustainably produced with high WP and NUE values by using PCU treatment or a combination of urea and organic fertilizer. The results of this study can also provide reference and basis for winter wheat production in similar eco-climate areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90 mm per time reduced water productivity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation water of 90 mm per timee0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation water of 90 mm per time decreased the WP and increased soil water storage and evapotranspiration (ET)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90 mm per time increased soil water storage and evapotranspiration.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation water of 90 mm per timee0
Outcome
soil water storage and evapotranspiration (ET)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation water of 90 mm per time decreased the WP and increased soil water storage and evapotranspiration (ET)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nitrogen replacement increased wheat leaf area index by 26.5–47.0% compared with no nitrogen.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation and nitrogen reduction replacemente0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.5–47.0%e0
Comparator
no-nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the no-nitrogen treatment, irrigation and nitrogen reduction replacement increased the leaf area index and chlorophyll content by 26.5–47.0% and 17.7–31.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nitrogen replacement increased chlorophyll content by 17.7–31.5% compared with no nitrogen.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation and nitrogen reduction replacemente0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.7–31.5%e0
Comparator
no-nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the no-nitrogen treatment, irrigation and nitrogen reduction replacement increased the leaf area index and chlorophyll content by 26.5–47.0% and 17.7–31.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% traditional nitrogen rate raised average wheat yield by 68.2%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
75% of the traditional nitrogen rate (75% U)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
68.2%e0

Not reportedComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75% of the traditional nitrogen rate (75% U), the traditional nitrogen rate (U), polymer-coated urea (PCU), and urea combined with organic fertilizer (U+OM) increased by 68.2%, 85.1%, 81.9%, and 95.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The traditional nitrogen rate raised average wheat yield by 85.1%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
the traditional nitrogen rate (U)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
85.1%e0

Not reportedComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the traditional nitrogen rate (U), polymer-coated urea (PCU), and urea combined with organic fertilizer (U+OM) increased by 68.2%, 85.1%, 81.9%, and 95.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer-coated urea raised average wheat yield by 81.9%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
polymer-coated urea (PCU)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
81.9%e0

Not reportedComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polymer-coated urea (PCU), and urea combined with organic fertilizer (U+OM) increased by 68.2%, 85.1%, 81.9%, and 95.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea plus organic fertilizer raised average wheat yield by 95.1%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
urea combined with organic fertilizer (U+OM)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
95.1%e0

Not reportedComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“urea combined with organic fertilizer (U+OM) increased by 68.2%, 85.1%, 81.9%, and 95.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average wheat grain nitrogen uptake rose by 90.0%, 117.5%, 111.9% and 147.2% under the four listed nitrogen treatments, respectively.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
nitrogen uptake of grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
90.0%, 117.5%, 111.9%, and 147.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the average nitrogen uptake of grains increased by 90.0%, 117.5%, 111.9%, and 147.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil nitrate decreased by 42.0%, 25.4% and 9.7% under 75% U, PCU and U+OM relative to U.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
residual nitrate nitrogene0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
42.0%, 25.4%, and 9.7%e0
Comparator
U treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the nitrate nitrogen after U treatment, the residual nitrate nitrogen in a 0–160-cm soil profile after 75% U, PCU, and U+OM treatments decreased by 42.0%, 25.4%, and 9.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average wheat nitrogen use efficiency increased by 4.7–30.5% after two years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.7–30.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average NUE of winter wheat increased by 4.7–30.5% after 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1582 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield correlated significantly with physiological growth indices other than evapotranspiration and thousand-grain weight, water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
except for ET and 1000-grain weighte0
Comparator
physiological growth indicese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of winter wheat was significantly correlated with physiological growth indices (except for ET and 1000-grain weight), WP, and NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Large irrigation amounts did not significantly increase wheat yield, water productivity or nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Large amounts of irrigation watere0
Outcome
winter wheat yield, WP, or NUEe0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large amounts of irrigation water did not significantly increase winter wheat yield, WP, or NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1725–1820 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60 mm irrigation with PCU or urea plus organic fertilizer for sustainable wheat production with high water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
irrigation volume is 60 mme0
Outcome
sustainably producede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the irrigation volume is 60 mm, winter wheat can be sustainably produced with high WP and NUE values by using PCU treatment or a combination of urea and organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–2009 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 92 positive, 9 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.