Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation increased root length of winter wheat by 121.1 percent compared with flood irrigation.

A claim from Soil moisture influences wheat yield by affecting root growth and the composition of microbial communities under drip fertigation · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation increased root length of winter wheat by 121.1 percent compared with flood irrigation.

Treatment
SDIe1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
121.1 %e1
Comparator
FPe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat is northern China’s biggest agricultural crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–133
e1

“Compared with FP, SDI significantly increased root length, total projected area (TPA), and total surface area (TSA) by 121.1 %, 26.3 %, and 69.6 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1080

Title

Soil moisture influences wheat yield by affecting root growth and the composition of microbial communities under drip fertigation

Xin Zhang; Yang Liu; Ziye Zhang; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2024. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109102

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-258f185d17fe8966d65559ea324951402c36c7310a3616652b8a401c98a591e9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.