Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition

Effect of bioregulators on growth, yield, and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Pradeep Kumar Gurjar

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important cereal crops globally, serving as a staple food for millions of people. The productivity of wheat is often constrained by environmental stress, poor nutrient uptake, and limited photosynthetic efficiency. Bioregulators such as thiourea and kinetin have emerged as promising tools to modulate physiological and biochemical processes in plants, thereby improving growth, yield, and economic returns. The present investigation was carried out during the rabi season with nine treatments, including seed soaking and foliar application of bioregulators at tillering and flowering stages. Growth traits (plant height, dry matter accumulation, chlorophyll content), yield attributes (effective tillers, spike length, grains per spike, test weight), yields (grain, straw, biological yield, harvest index), and economics (net returns and benefit-cost ratio) were evaluated. The results revealed significant differences among treatments. Foliar application of thiourea (500 ppm) at tillering and flowering (T6) and combined seed soaking + foliar spray of thiourea (T8) showed maximum improvements in plant height (89.90 cm), dry matter accumulation (250.14 g/m row), chlorophyll content (2.29%), and yield attributes. These treatments also recorded the highest grain yield (4732 kg/ha), biological yield (11,442 kg/ha), and harvest index (41.36%). Net returns (Rs. 80,786/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.35) were also superior under thiourea foliar spray compared to control (Rs. 52,740/ha; 1.34 B:C). Kinetin application (T5, T7, T9) also improved growth and productivity but was slightly inferior to thiourea treatments. The study concluded that thiourea, particularly in foliar application or in combination with seed soaking, is a highly effective bioregulator in wheat for enhancing physiological traits, productivity, and profitability. These findings support the integration of plant bioregulators into wheat production strategies to optimize resource use efficiency and improve food security

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea foliar and combined treatments gave maximum plant height of 89.90 cm.

Treatment
Foliar application of thiourea (500 ppm) at tillering and flowering (T6) and combined seed soaking + foliar spray of thiourea (T8)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximum improvementse0
Value
89.90 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of thiourea (500 ppm) at tillering and flowering (T6) and combined seed soaking + foliar spray of thiourea (T8) showed maximum improvements in plant height (89.90 cm), dry matter accumulation (250.14 g/m row), chlorophyll content (2.29%), and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea treatments gave maximum dry matter accumulation of 250.14 g/m row.

Treatment
Foliar application of thiourea (500 ppm) at tillering and flowering (T6) and combined seed soaking + foliar spray of thiourea (T8)e0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
maximum improvementse0
Value
250.14 g/m rowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of thiourea (500 ppm) at tillering and flowering (T6) and combined seed soaking + foliar spray of thiourea (T8) showed maximum improvements in plant height (89.90 cm), dry matter accumulation (250.14 g/m row), chlorophyll content (2.29%), and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea treatments gave maximum chlorophyll content of 2.29%.

Treatment
Foliar application of thiourea (500 ppm) at tillering and flowering (T6) and combined seed soaking + foliar spray of thiourea (T8)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
maximum improvementse0
Value
2.29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of thiourea (500 ppm) at tillering and flowering (T6) and combined seed soaking + foliar spray of thiourea (T8) showed maximum improvements in plant height (89.90 cm), dry matter accumulation (250.14 g/m row), chlorophyll content (2.29%), and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea treatments improved yield attributes.

Treatment
Foliar application of thiourea (500 ppm) at tillering and flowering (T6) and combined seed soaking + foliar spray of thiourea (T8)e0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
maximum improvementse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of thiourea (500 ppm) at tillering and flowering (T6) and combined seed soaking + foliar spray of thiourea (T8) showed maximum improvements in plant height (89.90 cm), dry matter accumulation (250.14 g/m row), chlorophyll content (2.29%), and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea treatments gave highest grain yield of 4732 kg/ha.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4732 kg/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments also recorded the highest grain yield (4732 kg/ha), biological yield (11,442 kg/ha), and harvest index (41.36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea treatments gave highest biological yield of 11,442 kg/ha.

Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11,442 kg/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments also recorded the highest grain yield (4732 kg/ha), biological yield (11,442 kg/ha), and harvest index (41.36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea treatments gave highest harvest index of 41.36%.

Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.36%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments also recorded the highest grain yield (4732 kg/ha), biological yield (11,442 kg/ha), and harvest index (41.36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea foliar spray gave superior net returns of Rs. 80,786/ha versus control.

Treatment
thiourea foliar spraye0
Outcome
Net returnse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
Rs. 80,786/hae0
Qualifier
Rs. 52,740/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net returns (Rs. 80,786/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.35) were also superior under thiourea foliar spray compared to control (Rs. 52,740/ha; 1.34 B:C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea foliar spray gave a superior benefit-cost ratio of 2.35 versus control.

Treatment
thiourea foliar spraye0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
superiore0
Value
2.35e0
Qualifier
1.34 B:Ce0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net returns (Rs. 80,786/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.35) were also superior under thiourea foliar spray compared to control (Rs. 52,740/ha; 1.34 B:C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin improved growth and productivity but less than thiourea.

Treatment
Kinetin application (T5, T7, T9)e0
Outcome
growth and productivitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
thiourea treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetin application (T5, T7, T9) also improved growth and productivity but was slightly inferior to thiourea treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support use of bioregulators in wheat production.

Outcome
integration of plant bioregulators into wheat production strategiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These findings support the integration of plant bioregulators into wheat production strategies to optimize resource use efficiency and improve food security”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2045 · show in text ↑

thiourea · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

thiourea · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

kinetin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

thiourea · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

stage · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

stage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 24 positive, 13 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 42 positive, 2 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.