Paper · 2004 · Landbauforschung Völkenrode : FAL agricultural research

Influence of nitrate and sodium chloride on concentration and internal distribution of mineral elements in broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Gal Tavori; Shahal Abbo; U. Kafkafi; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of the research was to evaluate the effect of nitrate and salt as limiting factors for the recycling of nutrient solutions in a hydroponic system. A broad bean (V. faba) and two chickpea( C. arietinum) cultivars (desi early) and kabuli (late flowering) type), were subjected in a factorial designed experiment to three levels of nitrate, and NaCl in the nutrient solution. The treatments were administered in a recycled nutrient solution. In the hydro­ ponics system employed recycled nutrient solution was supplied freshly every 45 minutes. Nutrient solutions were fully refreshed every 2 weeks or when the initial volume declined by about 10 % due to transpiration. Increasing nitrate levels increased the vegetative yield of both chickpea cultivars in each salt level. Salt always decreased chickpea yields. At only 12 mM NaCl in the nutrient solution seed yield of the kabuli type was reduced by a factor of 8 while in the desi type yield was reduced only by a factor of about 2 to 3. Increasing nitrate in the solution counteracted the salt effect on both vegetative and seed production by up to a factor of 3. In contrast to chickpea the vegetative and seed yield of broad bean was less sensitive to salinity. The distribution of mineral nutri­ ents between leaves and stems was depending on the nitrate and NaCl concentration in the nutrient: Phosphorus and manganese accumulated in the leaves relative to the stem with increasing nitrate supply but magnesium and sodium accumulated more in stems than in leaves. In con­ trast increasing salt in the solution decreased magnesium and calcium in the leaves relatively to the stems. Increas­ ing nitrate or salt in the solution decreased the number of live nodules on broad bean roots. Increasing nitrate con­ centration in the solution decreased molybdenum and phosphorus content and uptake in both legumes. The strongest effect in the experiment was observed with nitrate on molybdenum concentration and total uptake, which was reduced due to increasing nitrate supply by a factor of five. The proposed explanation for these results is that the increase in the rhizosphere pH due to nitrate uptake reduced the concentration of the species H2MoO4 (pK1=4.2) and H2PO4 - (pK1=7.2) close to the root sur­

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrate increased vegetative yield in both chickpea cultivars at every salt level.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Increasing nitrate levelse0
Outcome
vegetative yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in each salt levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrate levels increased the vegetative yield of both chickpea cultivars in each salt level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt decreased chickpea yields.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Salte0
Outcome
chickpea yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt always decreased chickpea yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 mM NaCl kabuli chickpea seed yield fell eightfold.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
kabuli typee0
Treatment
12 mM NaCle0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
a factor of 8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At only 12 mM NaCl in the nutrient solution seed yield of the kabuli type was reduced by a factor of 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 mM NaCl desi chickpea seed yield fell about two to threefold.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
desi typee0
Treatment
12 mM NaCle0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
a factor of about 2 to 3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At only 12 mM NaCl in the nutrient solution seed yield of the kabuli type was reduced by a factor of 8 while in the desi type yield was reduced only by a factor of about 2 to 3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrate counteracted the salt effect on vegetative and seed production by up to threefold.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Increasing nitratee0
Outcome
vegetative and seed productione0
Direction
counteractede0
Value
up to a factor of 3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrate in the solution counteracted the salt effect on both vegetative and seed production by up to a factor of 3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea( C. arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–215 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad bean vegetative and seed yields were less sensitive to salinity than chickpea yields.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabae0
Outcome
vegetative and seed yielde0
Direction
less sensitivee0
Comparator
chickpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast to chickpea the vegetative and seed yield of broad bean was less sensitive to salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrate shifted phosphorus and manganese accumulation toward leaves relative to stems.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
increasing nitrate supplye0
Outcome
Phosphorus and manganese accumulated in the leavese0
Direction
accumulatede0
Comparator
the steme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus and manganese accumulated in the leaves relative to the stem with increasing nitrate supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium and sodium accumulated more in stems than leaves under the reported mineral distribution comparison.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
magnesium and sodiume0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“magnesium and sodium accumulated more in stems than in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1532 · show in text ↑
t0

“broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt reduced magnesium and calcium in leaves relative to stems.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
increasing salte0
Outcome
magnesium and calcium in the leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the stemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing salt in the solution decreased magnesium and calcium in the leaves relatively to the stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrate reduced the number of live nodules on broad bean roots.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Increasing nitratee0
Outcome
number of live nodulese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrate or salt in the solution decreased the number of live nodules on broad bean roots.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1651–1753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt reduced the number of live nodules on broad bean roots.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
salte0
Outcome
number of live nodulese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrate or salt in the solution decreased the number of live nodules on broad bean roots.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1651–1753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrate decreased molybdenum and phosphorus content and uptake in both legumes.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Increasing nitrate con­ centratione0
Outcome
molybdenum and phosphorus content and uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrate con­ centration in the solution decreased molybdenum and phosphorus content and uptake in both legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1876 · show in text ↑
t0

“broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrate reduced molybdenum concentration and total uptake fivefold.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
increasing nitrate supplye0
Outcome
molybdenum concentration and total uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
a factor of fivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“molybdenum concentration and total uptake, which was reduced due to increasing nitrate supply by a factor of five.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2059 · show in text ↑
t0

“broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–167 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

salinity · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 4 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.