Paper · 2012

Research article RESPONSE OF YIELD, YIELD ATTRIBUTES AND GRAIN QUALITY OF THREE CORN CULTIVARS TO DEFOLIATION

Sasan Siahkouhian; Mohammad Reza Shakiba; Saeed Zehtab Salmasi; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Any kind of decrease or inefficiency of corn leaves caused by factors such as pests, diseases, mechanical damages and hail, leads to decrease photo-assimilate translocation to the kernels and yield decrease. In order to investigate the role of each part of maize canopy leaves on yield and yield component, and grain quality, an experiment was conducted in a factorial experiment using randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications at the Research Farm of faculty of agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran, during year 2007. maize cultivars were single cross 647, 604, 504 and defoliation treatments contain leaf removal in 1/3 of upper, 1/3 of median, 1/3 of lower part of canopy and control (without defoliation) that imposed at tasseling. The results indicated that while defoliation had significant effects on yield components (except number of row per cob and 100 grain weight ), grain yield per unit area, as well as ear length and leaf area index (LAI), quality of produced grains at defoliation levels including protein percent and oil percent did not differ considerably. The maximum LAI belonged to control and the least to the defoliation of the 1/3 in middle part of the canopy. In this study cultivars affected grain yield and mean 100 grain weight. Since the defoliation treatments had no significant impact on stem dry weight so it is concluded that maize leaves and especially median leaves have crucial role on photosynthesis and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation significantly affected corn yield components other than row number and 100 grain weight.

Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Qualifier
except number of row per cob and 100 grain weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that while defoliation had significant effects on yield components (except number of row per cob and 100 grain weight ), grain yield per unit area, as well as ear length and leaf area index (LAI), quality of produced grains at defoliation levels including protein percent and oil percent did not differ considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation significantly affected corn grain yield per unit area.

Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
grain yield per unit areae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that while defoliation had significant effects on yield components (except number of row per cob and 100 grain weight ), grain yield per unit area, as well as ear length and leaf area index (LAI), quality of produced grains at defoliation levels including protein percent and oil percent did not differ considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation significantly affected corn ear length.

Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
ear lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that while defoliation had significant effects on yield components (except number of row per cob and 100 grain weight ), grain yield per unit area, as well as ear length and leaf area index (LAI), quality of produced grains at defoliation levels including protein percent and oil percent did not differ considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation significantly affected corn leaf area index.

Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that while defoliation had significant effects on yield components (except number of row per cob and 100 grain weight ), grain yield per unit area, as well as ear length and leaf area index (LAI), quality of produced grains at defoliation levels including protein percent and oil percent did not differ considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation did not considerably change grain protein percent.

Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
protein percente0
Direction
did not differ considerablye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of produced grains at defoliation levels including protein percent and oil percent did not differ considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation did not considerably change grain oil percent.

Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
oil percente0
Direction
did not differ considerablye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of produced grains at defoliation levels including protein percent and oil percent did not differ considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants had maximum leaf area index.

Treatment
controle0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum LAI belonged to control and the least to the defoliation of the 1/3 in middle part of the canopy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of the middle third of canopy leaves gave the lowest leaf area index.

Treatment
defoliation of the 1/3 in middle part of the canopye0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum LAI belonged to control and the least to the defoliation of the 1/3 in middle part of the canopy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar affected corn grain yield.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study cultivars affected grain yield and mean 100 grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar affected mean 100 grain weight.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
mean 100 grain weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study cultivars affected grain yield and mean 100 grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation had no significant impact on stem dry weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
defoliation treatmentse0
Outcome
stem dry weighte0
Direction
no significant impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Since the defoliation treatments had no significant impact on stem dry weight so it is concluded that maize leaves and especially median leaves have crucial role on photosynthesis and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1477 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that maize leaves, especially median leaves, are crucial for photosynthesis and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
median leavese0
Outcome
photosynthesis and yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize leaves and especially median leaves have crucial role on photosynthesis and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1477 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

pruning · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

63 papers: 29 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.