Paper · 2014 · The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences

ASSESSING SOIL CHARACTERISTICS AND GUAVA ORCHARD PRODUCTIVITY AS INFLUENCED BY ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SUBSTRATES

Tarun Adak; K. Ashok Kumar; Atul Singha; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Guava cultivation in subtropical region of India is mainly confined to marginal lands under rainfed conditions resul ting in low productivity and poor fruit quality. Restoration of the soil quality of such guava orchards with low soil fertility i s one of the important aspects for enhancing orchard productivity and sustainability as millions of farmers are engaged in guava production for their livelihood and nutritional security. Keeping this in view, effects of organic and inorganic substrates on soil characteristic and guava orchard productivity were studied through field experimentations during 200712. Different combinations of organic (FYM, vermicompost, mulching, Azotobacter, PSM and Trichoderma harzianum) and inorganic (N, P, K) substrates were applied each year within the tree basin under subtropical environmental condition. At the end of the study, soils fertilize d with vermicompost, biofertilizers and organic mulching showed improvement in yield as compared to NPK+ FYM application. Higher soil moisture retention, soil fertility and organic carbon build up and better soil temperature regulation was observed under mulching treatment. Microbial population and dehydrogenase activity were significantly higher in plots treated with vermicompost, microbial inoculants and mulching as compared to NPK+FYM application. The highest pooled data of dehydrogenase activity (3.1µgTPFg -1 h -1 ) was recorded in the treatment receiving 10 kg vermicompost which was superior over application of 5 kg FYM + 5 kg vermicompost or 10 kg FYM. The correlation studies revealed positive and significant relationship among the soil factors and yield. Highest correlation was observed between yield and microbial populations (r = 0.93 * to 0.97 ** ). Dehydrogenase activity was also positively correlated with the soil organic carbon content (r = 0.99 ** ), soil moisture (r = 0.99 ** ), soil temperature (r = 0.95 * ) and soil nutrients (r = 0.91 * to 0.97 ** ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost, biofertilizers and mulch improved guava yield relative to NPK and farmyard manure.

Treatment
vermicompost, biofertilizers and organic mulchinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
NPK+ FYM applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soils fertilize d with vermicompost, biofertilizers and organic mulching showed improvement in yield as compared to NPK+ FYM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased soil moisture retention, fertility and organic carbon and improved temperature regulation.

Treatment
mulching treatmente0
Outcome
soil moisture retention, soil fertility and organic carbon build upe0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher soil moisture retention, soil fertility and organic carbon build up and better soil temperature regulation was observed under mulching treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost, inoculants and mulch raised microbial populations and dehydrogenase activity compared with NPK and manure.

Treatment
vermicompost, microbial inoculants and mulchinge0
Outcome
Microbial population and dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NPK+FYM applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial population and dehydrogenase activity were significantly higher in plots treated with vermicompost, microbial inoculants and mulching as compared to NPK+FYM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten kilograms vermicompost gave the highest dehydrogenase activity of 3.1 µg TPF per gram per hour.

Treatment
10 kg vermicomposte0
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.1µgTPFg -1 h -1e0
Comparator
5 kg FYM + 5 kg vermicompost or 10 kg FYMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pooled data of dehydrogenase activity (3.1µgTPFg -1 h -1 ) was recorded in the treatment receiving 10 kg vermicompost which was superior over application of 5 kg FYM + 5 kg vermicompost or 10 kg FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial populations were positively associated with guava yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Highest correlatione0
Value
r = 0.93 * to 0.97 **e0
Comparator
microbial populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest correlation was observed between yield and microbial populations (r = 0.93 * to 0.97 ** )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1754 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydrogenase activity was positively associated with soil organic carbon, moisture, temperature and nutrients.

Outcome
Dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
soil organic carbon contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dehydrogenase activity was also positively correlated with the soil organic carbon content (r = 0.99 ** ), soil moisture (r = 0.99 ** ), soil temperature (r = 0.95 * ) and soil nutrients (r = 0.91 * to 0.97 ** )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1967 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 74 positive, 2 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · soil: biology · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · soil: chemistry · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mulching · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.