Abstract
Pot experiment was conducted in the experimental station of the Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt with wheat plants to study the effect of foliar fertilization with algal extract or micronutrients fertilizer or their combinations on the dry matter accumulation in the plant shoots. Nutrient concentrations, uptake and balance were also under investigation. Results showed that the best concentrations of macronutrients were achieved by the algal extract treatments or the higher dose of the micronutrient fertilizer. However, the best uptake, nutrient balance and dry matter accumulation was recorded with combined algal extract and micronutrient fertilizer treatment. (Journal of American Science 2010; 6(9):631-636). (ISSN: 1545-1003).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The best macronutrient concentrations in wheat were achieved with the algal extract treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- algal extract treatmentse1
- Outcome
- concentrations of macronutrientse1
- Direction
- beste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with wheat plants”
e1“the best concentrations of macronutrients were achieved by the algal extract treatments or the higher dose of the micronutrient fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
The best macronutrient concentrations in wheat were achieved with the higher dose of the micronutrient fertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- the higher dose of the micronutrient fertilizere1
- Outcome
- concentrations of macronutrientse1
- Direction
- beste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with wheat plants”
e1“the best concentrations of macronutrients were achieved by the algal extract treatments or the higher dose of the micronutrient fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
The best nutrient uptake, nutrient balance and dry matter accumulation in wheat occurred with the combined algal extract and micronutrient fertilizer treatment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- combined algal extract and micronutrient fertilizer treatmente2
- Outcome
- uptake, nutrient balance and dry matter accumulatione2
- Direction
- beste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with wheat plants”
e2“the best uptake, nutrient balance and dry matter accumulation was recorded with combined algal extract and micronutrient fertilizer treatment”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →botanical · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →botanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
136 papers more in this group
See all 140 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
284 papers more in this group
See all 288 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.