Paper · 2012 · HortScience

Drip Irrigation in California Strawberry Nurseries to Reduce the Incidence of Colletotrichum acutatum in Fruit Production

Oleg Daugovish; Mark Bolda; Sukhwinder Kaur; et al.

14
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Strawberry anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum acutatum is often asymptomatic on plants in sprinkler-irrigated nurseries but destructive after transplantation into fruiting fields. This study evaluated the impact of strawberry nursery sprinkler and drip irrigation in the presence or absence of C. acutatum on post-transplantation plant growth, mortality, and fruit yield in fruiting fields in California. In a 2005 nursery at Tulelake, CA, dip infestation of mother plants with C. acutatum reduced early-season mother plant canopy size by 21% and delayed runner production in mother plants but otherwise had no obvious disease symptoms. In comparison with sprinkler-irrigated treatments in the nursery, drip irrigation of infested nursery plots reduced plant losses in fruit production fields by 86% at Watsonville, CA, in 2005 and 50% and 75% at Oxnard, CA, in 2005 and 2008. Transplants from infested nursery treatments had a 33% to 60% smaller canopy and 11% to 42% lower yield than transplants from uninfested nursery treatments. However, transplant canopy size and yield from the infested and then drip-irrigated nursery treatment were similar to the sprinkler-irrigated, non-infested nursery treatment. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction measurements of C. acutatum in crown tissue of fruiting field plants seven weeks after transplanting showed significantly more C. acutatum (≈11×) in their crowns in sprinkler-irrigated than drip-irrigated, infested nursery transplant treatments. During the course of fruit production, the amount of C. acutatum in crown tissue increased in all treatments. However, at the end of the fruit season, there was still significantly more (≈8×) C. acutatum in the crowns of the plants produced by sprinkler irrigation than by drip irrigation in the nursery. These data suggest that if C. acutatum is present in the nursery, drip irrigation can reduce subsequent plant stunting and yield losses in strawberry production fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. acutatum infestation reduced mother plant canopy size by 21%.

Treatment
dip infestation of mother plants with C. acutatume0
Interactor
C. acutatumColletotrichum acutatume0pathogen
Outcome
mother plant canopy sizee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21%e0
Setting
Tulelake, CAe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum acutatum
Colletotrichum acutatum · InteractorRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a 2005 nursery at Tulelake, CA, dip infestation of mother plants with C. acutatum reduced early-season mother plant canopy size by 21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. acutatum infestation delayed strawberry runner production.

Treatment
dip infestation of mother plants with C. acutatume0
Interactor
C. acutatumColletotrichum acutatume0pathogen
Outcome
runner productione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum acutatum
Colletotrichum acutatum · InteractorRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dip infestation of mother plants with C. acutatum reduced early-season mother plant canopy size by 21% and delayed runner production in mother plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–591 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested mother plants had no obvious other disease symptoms.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
disease symptomse0
Direction
no obviouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delayed runner production in mother plants but otherwise had no obvious disease symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery drip irrigation reduced field plant losses by 86% at Watsonville in 2005.

Treatment
drip irrigation of infested nursery plotse0
Outcome
plant lossese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
86%e0
Comparator
sprinkler-irrigated treatmentse0
Setting
Watsonville, CAe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison with sprinkler-irrigated treatments in the nursery, drip irrigation of infested nursery plots reduced plant losses in fruit production fields by 86% at Watsonville, CA, in 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery drip irrigation reduced field plant losses by 50% at Oxnard in 2005.

Treatment
drip irrigation of infested nursery plotse0
Outcome
plant lossese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
2005e0
Comparator
sprinkler-irrigated treatmentse0
Setting
Oxnard, CAe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison with sprinkler-irrigated treatments in the nursery, drip irrigation of infested nursery plots reduced plant losses in fruit production fields by 86% at Watsonville, CA, in 2005 and 50% and 75% at Oxnard, CA, in 2005 and 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery drip irrigation reduced field plant losses by 75% at Oxnard in 2008.

Treatment
drip irrigation of infested nursery plotse0
Outcome
plant lossese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75%e0
Qualifier
2008e0
Comparator
sprinkler-irrigated treatmentse0
Setting
Oxnard, CAe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison with sprinkler-irrigated treatments in the nursery, drip irrigation of infested nursery plots reduced plant losses in fruit production fields by 86% at Watsonville, CA, in 2005 and 50% and 75% at Oxnard, CA, in 2005 and 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplants from infested nurseries had 33% to 60% smaller canopies.

Treatment
infested nursery treatmentse0
Outcome
canopye0
Direction
smallere0
Value
33% to 60%e0
Comparator
uninfested nursery treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Transplants from infested nursery treatments had a 33% to 60% smaller canopy and 11% to 42% lower yield than transplants from uninfested nursery treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplants from infested nurseries had 11% to 42% lower yield.

Treatment
infested nursery treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
11% to 42%e0
Comparator
uninfested nursery treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Transplants from infested nursery treatments had a 33% to 60% smaller canopy and 11% to 42% lower yield than transplants from uninfested nursery treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy size after infested drip-irrigated nursery treatment resembled uninfested sprinkler controls.

Treatment
infested and then drip-irrigated nursery treatmente0
Outcome
transplant canopy sizee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sprinkler-irrigated, non-infested nursery treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“transplant canopy size and yield from the infested and then drip-irrigated nursery treatment were similar to the sprinkler-irrigated, non-infested nursery treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield after infested drip-irrigated nursery treatment resembled uninfested sprinkler controls.

Treatment
infested and then drip-irrigated nursery treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sprinkler-irrigated, non-infested nursery treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“transplant canopy size and yield from the infested and then drip-irrigated nursery treatment were similar to the sprinkler-irrigated, non-infested nursery treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At seven weeks, sprinkler nursery plants had about elevenfold more crown C. acutatum than drip nursery plants.

Organ / stage
crown tissuee0
Treatment
sprinkler-irrigatede0
Interactor
C. acutatumColletotrichum acutatume0pathogen
Outcome
C. acutatum in crown tissuee0
Direction
moree0
Value
≈11×e0
Comparator
drip-irrigatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum acutatum
Colletotrichum acutatum · InteractorRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quantitative polymerase chain reaction measurements of C. acutatum in crown tissue of fruiting field plants seven weeks after transplanting showed significantly more C. acutatum (≈11×) in their crowns in sprinkler-irrigated than drip-irrigated, infested nursery transplant treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1495 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown C. acutatum increased during fruit production in all treatments.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
C. acutatumColletotrichum acutatume0pathogen
Outcome
amount of C. acutatum in crown tissuee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum acutatum
Colletotrichum acutatum · InteractorRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the course of fruit production, the amount of C. acutatum in crown tissue increased in all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At season end, sprinkler nursery plants had about eightfold more crown C. acutatum than drip nursery plants.

Treatment
sprinkler irrigatione0
Interactor
C. acutatumColletotrichum acutatume0pathogen
Outcome
C. acutatum in the crownse0
Direction
moree0
Value
≈8×e0
Comparator
drip irrigatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum acutatum
Colletotrichum acutatum · InteractorRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the end of the fruit season, there was still significantly more (≈8×) C. acutatum in the crowns of the plants produced by sprinkler irrigation than by drip irrigation in the nursery.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1800 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude drip irrigation can reduce subsequent strawberry stunting and yield loss when the pathogen is present.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Interactor
C. acutatumColletotrichum acutatume0pathogen
Outcome
plant stunting and yield lossese0
Direction
reducee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum acutatum
Colletotrichum acutatum · InteractorRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if C. acutatum is present in the nursery, drip irrigation can reduce subsequent plant stunting and yield losses in strawberry production fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–1969 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

infection · survival · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

infection · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transplanting · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

infection · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

transplanting · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 8 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.