Paper · 2001

EFFECT OF SOIL WATER POTENTIAL ON YIELD AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY WHEAT AT DIFFERENT FERTILIZER RATES

Muhi Eldeen Hussien Ibrahim; Tariq Siddique; MN Ishaq

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Information about optimum soil water content for efficient use of nutrients is essential for higher crop yield. A pot experiment was conducted from 1996 to 1998 to assess the effect of soil water potential and NPK fertilizer rates on yield and nutrient uptake of wheat. Four water potential ranges (0 to 33, 33 to 100, 33 to 500, 33 to 1000 kPa) along with three fertilizers rates (0-0-0, 37-25-25, 75-50-50 mg of NPK kg'1) were investigated in factorial arrangements. Soil water content at prefixed water potential was determined from soil moisture characteristic curve. When soil water content decreased beyond the lower limit of prefixed soil water potential treatment, the required amount of water was added to raise the soil water content at 33 kPa of each treatment, except 0 to 33 kPa treatment, which fluctuated between 33 to WOO kPa. The increase in soil water potential from 33 to 500 kPa significantly decreased grain and straw yields and uptakes of N, P and K. Conversely, increase in fertilizer rate application increased the yields of grain and straw and uptake ofN, P and K. The data suggested that optimum wheat yield could be obtained at lower soil water potential level, and balanced fertilizer application can compensate the losses due to the moisture stress to some extent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil water potential from 33 to 500 kPa decreased wheat grain and straw yields.

Treatment
soil water potential from 33 to 500 kPae0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in soil water potential from 33 to 500 kPa significantly decreased grain and straw yields and uptakes of N, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil water potential from 33 to 500 kPa decreased N, P and K uptake.

Treatment
soil water potential from 33 to 500 kPae0
Outcome
uptakes of N, P and Ke0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in soil water potential from 33 to 500 kPa significantly decreased grain and straw yields and uptakes of N, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilizer rates increased grain and straw yields.

Treatment
fertilizer rate applicatione0
Outcome
yields of grain and strawe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in fertilizer rate application increased the yields of grain and straw and uptake ofN, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilizer rates increased N, P and K uptake.

Treatment
fertilizer rate applicatione0
Outcome
uptake ofN, P and Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in fertilizer rate application increased the yields of grain and straw and uptake ofN, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest optimum wheat yield at lower soil water potential and balanced fertilizer to partly compensate moisture stress losses.

Outcome
optimum wheat yield could be obtained at lower soil water potential level, and balanced fertilizer application can compensate the lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum wheat yield could be obtained at lower soil water potential level, and balanced fertilizer application can compensate the losses due to the moisture stress to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1292 · show in text ↑

soil water · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 50 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

soil water · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.